Gameshow Mafia (Reroll): Game Over

0verki11 · Post Post #2325 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:23 pm

In post 2323, OkaPoka wrote:Since coalition size changes based on playerlist

It would be best if we shrunk down the playerlist a bit before we coalitioned

But we want to shrink it as much as possible without having nk's happen

Which is the theory behind dance first i think

yes but if another scum dies it becomes unusable

OkaPoka · Post Post #2326 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:23 pm

i thought coalition worked with 2 maf alive?

Titus · Post Post #2327 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:23 pm

In post 2321, NanceFloor wrote:Like I feel like mafia having control over the pairs is bad

but maybe I just have Merchant's Daughter ptsd

We did fine with 8ball, but I think the wishes have been noted. As far as I know with my reset, I have a lock core of 3 slots, me, tmck and Oka. I need to look at the VCs too.

Titus · Post Post #2328 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:24 pm

In post 2326, OkaPoka wrote:i thought coalition worked with 2 maf alive?

It does.

0verki11 · Post Post #2329 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:24 pm

wait I read it wrong nvm

OkaPoka · Post Post #2330 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:24 pm

And we happen to hit a scum pair in a dance then we 1of4 and just win

pedit: its ok overkill

happened to me too

chennisden · Post Post #2331 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:25 pm

In post 2282, OkaPoka wrote:I would like everyone to sign onto the idea that both coalition pools must be with completely separate people barring the repicker

terrible idea.

0verki11 · Post Post #2332 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:26 pm

If we do dance do we afterwards Reavel LHF and then coalition?

OkaPoka · Post Post #2333 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:26 pm

I'm just wondering if veto'ing first is ever worth it

IF we have 4 slots that are straight up going to be ? forever it might be

pedit: chennis we've moved on pls dont bring up any of my theorycrafting posts

chennisden · Post Post #2334 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:28 pm

i was catching up

chennisden · Post Post #2335 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:28 pm

i think vetoing first is not a terrible idea.

chennisden · Post Post #2336 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:29 pm

putting the four scummiest slots there might help with coal

Titus · Post Post #2337 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:29 pm

Double veto? We can load RC in with his scumpool.

Titus · Post Post #2338 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:29 pm

Oh wait his scpool is obvtown

0verki11 · Post Post #2339 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:30 pm

In post 2333, OkaPoka wrote:I'm just wondering if veto'ing first is ever worth it

IF we have 4 slots that are straight up going to be ? forever it might be

pedit: chennis we've moved on pls dont bring up any of my theorycrafting posts

I mean if we veto right we auto win
If we dont we lose 2 LHF/scummy town and we kept a town alive. Might be worth instead of a reavel.

chennisden · Post Post #2340 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:31 pm

We veto once as an intermediate step to doing something that will win.

OkaPoka · Post Post #2341 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:32 pm

I'm just spitting out ideas that would make the coalition easier

But I think two shots at coalition is preferable to having an easier one coalition

Titus · Post Post #2342 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:33 pm

Why don't we just put in the major d1 wagons in the veto? Force scum to deal with my VCA.

Then, for the next veto, we'll have empirical data.

OkaPoka · Post Post #2343 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:35 pm

I still think one veto and two coalitions is better than two vetos and one coalition

Titus · Post Post #2344 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:36 pm

In post 2343, OkaPoka wrote:I still think one veto and two coalitions is better than two vetos and one coalition

I can live with that. My VCA, even if not rock solid, can fuel the coalitions.

OkaPoka · Post Post #2345 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:37 pm

That's fine.

Veto -> Dance -> Coalition x2 stands to be the gameplan then?

Titus · Post Post #2346 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:37 pm

P.S. I have about 40% confident RC is floundering scum.

Titus · Post Post #2347 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:38 pm

In post 2345, OkaPoka wrote:That's fine.

Veto -> Dance -> Coalition x2 stands to be the gameplan then?

Wait why is Dance there now?

OkaPoka · Post Post #2348 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:38 pm

I was thinking we could potentially use dance to cut down more people to make a coalition stronger.

Plus we can always choose not to lynch a dance pair. Scum still don't nk.

Titus · Post Post #2349 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:40 pm

In post 2348, OkaPoka wrote:I was thinking we could potentially use dance to cut down more people to make a coalition stronger.

Plus we can always choose not to lynch a dance pair. Scum still don't nk.

We'd have to kill in Dance.