Lets talk about it tomorrowIn post 397, skitter30 wrote:march i kinda think that you lot might be scum
-march
Lets talk about it tomorrowIn post 397, skitter30 wrote:march i kinda think that you lot might be scum
nopeIn post 398, Irrelephant11 wrote:Feeling sick. Glad my “hot take” got a conversation moving
Kinda don’t townread the two votes that followed my read, but I also doubt they’re ever s/s
Hopefully I’ll be healthy and clear headed tomorrow
Skitter I’ve only mindmelded with you like 1.5 times this game. Are you scum
hehIn post 335, skitter30 wrote:fair enough; i didn't remember your rvs vote thereIn post 255, tris wrote:I think it's comparable to how I was with my vote on ofrzh in RVS. I don't really see what you're talking about.
i also don't know if scum!you argues with me for giving you a townread so
I think this is correct. I'm still townreading Fuscezu.In post 379, skitter30 wrote: i'm still mulling over whether or not it's scummy; i'm not sure that scum says this post in conjunction with the next one tho (the one pointing out that scum could defend lhf just as easily as vote them) - if you're scum trying to stave off the wagon you'd kinda want to incentivize people defending you, i'd imagine, not point out that it's a good place for scum to sit
In post 364, Fuscezu wrote:LHF wagons are really bad for vca
Maybe you should actually vote then, and start a good wagon.In post 365, Fuscezu wrote:Scums literally as likely to defend LHF with minimal content as attack it.
I noticed it last night and its been an allgame thing it seems.In post 153, skitter30 wrote:not sure scum!tris says this really?
I feel like they may have townishly rolled scum, but thats not really a strong or science-backed read.In post 171, Miss Kobayashi Maru wrote:today i townishly slept through all my alarms
Im back and forth on this in general; ie as scum i often feign ignorance or read ahead and 'anticipate' concerns people raise later on when i catchup. But as town/scum i also tend to read the most current pages first just to make sure i didnt miss any big new developments. I think its a kind of weak point to raise whatever the case though, and wonder why you felt the need to bring it up. But thats not something I can pin down as scum or not yet. Soon thoughIn post 205, Persivul wrote:That's either an uncannily keen observation...or you read ahead and are only pretending to be doing a post by post catch-up.
Yes, im more in agreement here than not.In post 214, insomnia wrote:It feels rather shallow to vote based on such a weak push. Did you even read my other posts or you saw something that you could've easily jumped on?
You put words in my mouth in the beginning and now are pushing me based on not paying attention.
VOTE: Persivul
No, its not a tunnel.In post 214, insomnia wrote:Bring it dude, you picked the wrong tunnel
Anti-town roles win try to further their wincon.In post 231, ClearlyClarity wrote:- Third-party factions indicate roles like SK or Survivor iirc? I haven't ever played in any games with those roles, what's the meta?
In post 254, Chara wrote:i was going to put some effort in here, but then skitter did town things and i decided i could rest instead.
also, as someone who holds onto its vote far too much, i don't find insomnia's not immediately voting to be a bad thing, really.
good voteIn post 273, Irrelephant11 wrote:why did the game stall? scum apparently feel comfy
Let's go.... here VOTE: chara