Gameshow Mafia (Reroll): Game Over

Skygazer · Post Post #5200 (ISO) » Mon May 20, 2019 8:45 am

moon def needs to be in any veto
gonna read fusc's iso now

Skygazer · Post Post #5201 (ISO) » Mon May 20, 2019 8:45 am

or if not now then 2nite

NanceFloor · Post Post #5202 (ISO) » Mon May 20, 2019 8:54 am

In post 5198, Pink Ball wrote:
In post 5196, Moongrass wrote:It's pretty biased that RC says that makes PB scummy when he seemed to townread 0K around the time he was putting himself in the veto.
RC wants me to be scum 'cause I called him scum, it's as simple as that. I'm hoping he realizes that he's being daft, especially since I'm not even scumreading him.

I disagree with him but I don’t agree with you that it’s an OMGUS. He was pinged by Ank’s begging to be in veto prior to your replace in. Honestly, you’re wanting to be in veto is the only thing concerning me because I still think my 2 coalition member + 2 consensus sr is best, problem for me is I’m only really confident on one. I don’t think you should be okay with being vetoed. We both know that you’re really good at catching scum so why deprive town of that?

NanceFloor · Post Post #5203 (ISO) » Mon May 20, 2019 8:55 am

In post 5200, Skygazer wrote:moon def needs to be in any veto
gonna read fusc's iso now

+1

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #5204 (ISO) » Mon May 20, 2019 8:55 am

something I was thinking of

I was reconsidering skygazer because her play today was so terrible but I don't think it would actually be this terrible if she was scum

Skygazer · Post Post #5205 (ISO) » Mon May 20, 2019 8:58 am

wow you finally learned the best way to read me

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #5206 (ISO) » Mon May 20, 2019 8:59 am

Maria why aren't you playing the game

Pink Ball · Post Post #5207 (ISO) » Mon May 20, 2019 9:16 am

In post 5202, NanceFloor wrote:
In post 5198, Pink Ball wrote:
In post 5196, Moongrass wrote:It's pretty biased that RC says that makes PB scummy when he seemed to townread 0K around the time he was putting himself in the veto.
RC wants me to be scum 'cause I called him scum, it's as simple as that. I'm hoping he realizes that he's being daft, especially since I'm not even scumreading him.
I disagree with him but I don’t agree with you that it’s an OMGUS. He was pinged by Ank’s begging to be in veto prior to your replace in. Honestly, you’re wanting to be in veto is the only thing concerning me because I still think my 2 coalition member + 2 consensus sr is best, problem for me is I’m only really confident on one. I don’t think you should be okay with being vetoed. We both know that you’re really good at catching scum so why deprive town of that?

I'm not *that* good at catching scum, even less in this game in particular because of repping in. I think you got this.

If it wasn't for the previous coalition thing, I wouldn't veto myself. But Titus' plan sounds good so why not follow it?

Moongrass · Post Post #5208 (ISO) » Mon May 20, 2019 9:17 am

It's like people don't read or something lol.

NanceFloor · Post Post #5209 (ISO) » Mon May 20, 2019 10:08 am

In post 5208, Moongrass wrote:It's like people don't read or something lol.

Read what?

chennisden · Post Post #5210 (ISO) » Mon May 20, 2019 11:45 am

In post 5163, themilkcartonkid wrote:UNVOTE: okay, two things:
1 rc and pb liked my veto and that's not a good sign for it.
2 that point about fusco and rc was really convincing. I was very wrong

The point is FUSCO SLIPPED RC AS

TOWN

chennisden · Post Post #5211 (ISO) » Mon May 20, 2019 11:46 am

VOTE: Chemist1422, Clemency, Creature, Pink Ball

Fine.

chennisden · Post Post #5212 (ISO) » Mon May 20, 2019 11:48 am

I have no idea why we don't put Moongrass in veto

It essentially makes it a 3P veto, no?

Time Devil · Post Post #5213 (ISO) » Mon May 20, 2019 12:16 pm

why is creature in your veto chen

-TL

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #5214 (ISO) » Mon May 20, 2019 12:19 pm

Why hasn't Baezu posted TL?

Time Devil · Post Post #5215 (ISO) » Mon May 20, 2019 12:28 pm

In post 5214, RadiantCowbells wrote:Why hasn't Baezu posted TL?

I don't know.

-TL

Moongrass · Post Post #5216 (ISO) » Mon May 20, 2019 12:46 pm

In post 5210, chennisden wrote:
In post 5163, themilkcartonkid wrote:UNVOTE: okay, two things:
1 rc and pb liked my veto and that's not a good sign for it.
2 that point about fusco and rc was really convincing. I was very wrong
The point is FUSCO SLIPPED RC AS
TOWN

Or did you just now?

chennisden · Post Post #5217 (ISO) » Mon May 20, 2019 2:43 pm

In post 5213, Time Devil wrote:why is creature in your veto chen

-TL

because this veto is honestly the only one anyone will support

chennisden · Post Post #5218 (ISO) » Mon May 20, 2019 2:44 pm

VOTE: Chemist1422, Clemency, Moongrass, Pink Ball

Sorry Titus but Moongrass is bleeding scum.

Titus · Post Post #5219 (ISO) » Mon May 20, 2019 2:47 pm

NanceFloor · Post Post #5220 (ISO) » Mon May 20, 2019 5:52 pm

In post 5210, chennisden wrote:
In post 5163, themilkcartonkid wrote:UNVOTE: okay, two things:
1 rc and pb liked my veto and that's not a good sign for it.
2 that point about fusco and rc was really convincing. I was very wrong
The point is FUSCO SLIPPED RC AS
TOWN

That’s exactly what I was saying. I feel bad about tmck but I just didn’t want to not say anything and have him lose us the game.

NanceFloor · Post Post #5221 (ISO) » Mon May 20, 2019 5:53 pm

In post 5212, chennisden wrote:I have no idea why we don't put Moongrass in veto

It essentially makes it a 3P veto, no?

I wanted him in mine.

NanceFloor · Post Post #5222 (ISO) » Mon May 20, 2019 5:55 pm

In post 5216, Moongrass wrote:
In post 5210, chennisden wrote:
In post 5163, themilkcartonkid wrote:UNVOTE: okay, two things:
1 rc and pb liked my veto and that's not a good sign for it.
2 that point about fusco and rc was really convincing. I was very wrong
The point is FUSCO SLIPPED RC AS
TOWN
Or did you just now?

What? I essentially pretty much said the same thing.

NanceFloor · Post Post #5223 (ISO) » Mon May 20, 2019 5:56 pm

In post 5135, NanceFloor wrote:
In post 5133, Creature wrote:What does it even mean?
It reads like a TMI on wanting to kill RC. Saying he’s “unkillable”, reads like a TMI on RC town. It reads like a scumslip to me. You say unlynchable not
unkillable
.

In post 5138, NanceFloor wrote:
In post 5136, Moongrass wrote:It's weird that he hedged about the likelihood of lynching RC but gave alignment reads for the others.
Which means he scumslipped on RC town. Saying “not unkillable” over “unlynchable” sounds like he was thinking about NKing RC.

Moongrass · Post Post #5224 (ISO) » Mon May 20, 2019 6:22 pm

Yes but you gave a reason which chen is just echoing because he's following the hurricane that is you around.