It's role madness. How does this prove anything?In post 1307, Irrelephant11 wrote:So how did I get a night result then..?In post 1288, ClearlyClarity wrote:I'm jailkeeper and the other JK is town. Jailed irrelephant last night
Maybe try to let me claim first next time, ye?
Can you elaborate on this?In post 1323, Succinct wrote:
I find the way ClearlyClarity claimed to be suspect,but, believe this:Actually indicates ClearlyClarity's truthful about their claim.In post 1307, Irrelephant11 wrote:So how did I get a night result then..?In post 1288, ClearlyClarity wrote:I'm jailkeeper and the other JK is town. Jailed irrelephant last night
Maybe try to let me claim first next time, ye?
I honestly just didn't care about defending myself at the time cause skitter was a counterwagon and I didn't have much to defend myself with. The lolhammer was what set me offIn post 1313, Chara wrote:when Clearly supposedly thought she was hammered, but then started "spewing herself town", it didn't feel like something that town who just got hammered would say. she was here before when explaining why she didn't explain her skitter vote, but it's only after she was "hammered" that she began to call out scumreading her at all, like in 1299.
This is super nitpicky tbh? 5 votes are enough to hammer in a 7p game so I would've assumed I'd been hammered anyway. Like if you really think about this, what's more likely: that I had a brain fart and really assumed I'd been hammered, or that I pulled off a gambit that played on your impressions of my newbishness?In post 1314, Chara wrote:it's also day 2, which, in a 9 player newbie game, usually means 7 players, not 9. and in this case, means 13 to 11. what's also strange is that she didn't look at any votecounts when figuring out votes to lynch, and instead counted them with the assumption of there being 9 players. it's... a really weird mistake to me. i might get it on day 1, but she must have played newbies where the votes to lynch went lower than 5, unless she kept dying day 1.
Or...In post 1326, ceejayvinoya wrote:It proves that he wasn't roleblocked yesterday. In other words...
...He wasn't jailed?
Tha might have been the cause.In post 1330, ClearlyClarity wrote:Or...In post 1326, ceejayvinoya wrote:It proves that he wasn't roleblocked yesterday. In other words...
...He wasn't jailed?
I could've been roleblocked?
This was the first thing that pinged me. Their responses to your interrogation (esp the questionable claim) encouraged my vote.In post 911, Smile wrote:I've been thinking about skitter's argument on CC, and to be honest CC is a slot that has been very much under the radar for me. Despite having 50+ posts I feel like the slot has had very little presence. On going back through the iso 674 jumps out at me --while I appreciate the townread, the more important thing to me is skitter scum along with fusc and cj. CJ is null to me but could be scum, fusc I think is scum, and skitter is someone I can see CC being paranoid about as town. So this would not be my first preference for today. That being said, I feel like CC did not push Fuscezu very hard after voting that slot, so there's some risk of that being scum distancing. I'd vote there if I have to to avoid my own mislynch but I'd much prefer Fusc, and if not Fusc then tris.
Sure.In post 1328, ceejayvinoya wrote:Can you elaborate on this?In post 1323, Succinct wrote:I find the way ClearlyClarity claimed to be suspect,but, believe this:Actually indicates ClearlyClarity's truthful about their claim.In post 1307, Irrelephant11 wrote:So how did I get a night result then..?In post 1288, ClearlyClarity wrote:I'm jailkeeper and the other JK is town. Jailed irrelephant last night
Maybe try to let me claim first next time, ye?
In post 1335, RCEnigma wrote:This games already been a rollercoaster for me.
In post 1323, Succinct wrote:It's actually important.In post 1247, Succinct wrote:Still could use this.In post 1239, Succinct wrote:Pardon me, but who did you target?In post 1221, RCEnigma wrote:Got a couple pages to read, I was redirected to myself last night. Turns out I'm fabulous.
Your reason for voting Smile was surface level.In post 1334, ClearlyClarity wrote:I'll be honest, while my play has been subpar and obv lynchbaity I feel like I'm being wagoned for surface-level reasons. Especially after my little mishap.
Maybe i didnt see those? i dont remember them. But i feel that percy is pocketing you tbh, and that does make you town no matter his own alignment.In post 675, Irrelephant11 wrote:what's the difference between that and the other ISO explorations I've done this game?
In post 678, Flavor Leaf wrote:Pretty sure this game is actually bastard, by the way. Just a heads up to not be surprised later.
In post 1, funkybike1 wrote:There are no bastard elements in this game; I will never deliberately lie to you outside the bounds of normal gameplay. All investigative roles are Sane unless they are explicitly told they have a chance to be non-Sane.
Im going to start pling shit like thisIn post 685, Flavor Leaf wrote:You get to lynch me too, so I literally can’t get away. Just later.
ebwopIn post 1341, insomnia wrote:Your reason for voting Smile was surface level.In post 1334, ClearlyClarity wrote:I'll be honest, while my play has been subpar and obv lynchbaity I feel like I'm being wagoned for surface-level reasons. Especially after my little mishap.
I’ll ask again, why jail Irrel over the person who lynched scum?
