Krazy's Anime Upick (Game Over)

Ankamius · Post Post #825 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 3:06 am

Votecount 1.6

Alchemist21(4)

~ jjh927, Pink Ball, CheekyTeeky, Xtoxm

CheekyTeeky(3)

~ mastina, Titus, Alchemist21

TTTT(3)

~ Shiro, Emperor flippyNips, Panzerjager

Shiro(1)

~ Alisae

mastina(1)

~ Tet

Skygazer(1)

~ TTTT

Not Voting (5): Brock and Onyx, Skygazer, Flavor Leaf, Cafe Stile, Chaos Wind

With 18 alive it takes 10 to lynch.

Day 1 deadline is in (expired on 2019-06-04 21:08:47)

MOD NOTESPlease be aware that I do not use the autoVC program, so my VCs will be somewhat differently formatted than Krazy's. I apologize for this in advance.

FLAVORTBD

jjh927 · Post Post #826 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 3:11 am

VOTE: CheekyTeeky

Shiro · Post Post #827 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:12 am

@Titus huh?

PJ. · Post Post #828 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:17 am

In post 824, Titus wrote:
In post 817, Shiro wrote:
In post 814, PJ. wrote:Mmm. I like this assessment of reassessment.

vote: TTTT
YUS my cookies worked.

Dude, we need to talk. He's getting the dark cookies tonight or tomorrow.

Dark cookies? Like double fudge?

PJ. · Post Post #829 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:17 am

Shiro, I request chocolate cookie with chocolate chips. Or maybe a brookie.

Titus · Post Post #830 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:31 am

In post 827, Shiro wrote:@Titus huh?

If Panzer will hurt the masons, he can't have good cookies.

PJ. · Post Post #831 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:41 am

mason. I will hurt mason. singular.

Titus · Post Post #832 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:44 am

In post 831, PJ. wrote:mason. I will hurt mason. singular.

Indifferent. The Mason can be dumb as crap, you don't hurt Mason's or I hurt you. Got it?

Shiro · Post Post #833 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:47 am

Δο ςε ρεαλλυ βελιεωε τηε μασον ψλαιμ ψαθσε ηονεστλυ ι δο νοτ

Alchemist21 · Post Post #834 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:49 am

Why don’t you believe the claim?

Shiro · Post Post #835 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:50 am

In post 833, Shiro wrote:Δο ςε ρεαλλυ βελιεωε τηε μασον ψλαιμ ψαθσε ηονεστλυ ι δο νοτ

Ooopsie

Do we really believe the mason claim cause honestly I do not.

PJ. · Post Post #836 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:50 am

hurt me bb

PJ. · Post Post #837 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:51 am

I do believe it.

Cause it's a really dumb fucking gambit.

Shiro · Post Post #838 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:51 am

In post 834, Alchemist21 wrote:Why don’t you believe the claim?

I am happy you understood that before I corrected it.

Because this is mastina, she has done that in the past before. She really isnt above claiming mason with her scum partner. It kinda bothers me that Titus defended it like that cause she would know that as well..

Brock and Onyx · Post Post #839 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:51 am

Brock and Onyx · Post Post #840 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:52 am

It's been a long time, isn't it?

Shiro · Post Post #841 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:52 am

In post 837, PJ. wrote:I do believe it.

Cause it's a really dumb fucking gambit.

I mean this is mastina. She has litteraly done it before.

Brock and Onyx · Post Post #842 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:52 am

I think Clemency disappeared on me.

Elsa Jay · Post Post #843 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:54 am

In post 841, Shiro wrote:
In post 837, PJ. wrote:I do believe it.

Cause it's a really dumb fucking gambit.
I mean this is mastina. She has litteraly done it before.

Yeah but I literally begged her not to claim day 1 since I didn't feel like getting shot so early. But we must support our family. Even during shitty desicions.

Alchemist21 · Post Post #844 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:55 am

In post 838, Shiro wrote:
In post 834, Alchemist21 wrote:Why don’t you believe the claim?
I am happy you understood that before I corrected it.

Because this is mastina, she has done that in the past before. She really isnt above claiming mason with her scum partner. It kinda bothers me that Titus defended it like that cause she would know that as well..

I believe Mastina would do that but not Elsa. Scum Elsa is more interested in making false associations with people who aren’t partners and WIFOMing the game.

Titus · Post Post #845 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:56 am

In post 838, Shiro wrote:
In post 834, Alchemist21 wrote:Why don’t you believe the claim?
I am happy you understood that before I corrected it.

Because this is mastina, she has done that in the past before. She really isnt above claiming mason with her scum partner. It kinda bothers me that Titus defended it like that cause she would know that as well..

On Day 1 in a large, if they live forever, I'll handle the problem. If they drop me, then worry. It's a Mason claim, worry about it later.

Endgame Mason claims are more to worry about.

PJ. · Post Post #846 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:57 am

well...like..if you don't believe the claim and I would kill her even if she was town, why don't we just do that instead of cookie toasting over 4T being a chronic reassess-er ?

unvote, vote mastina

Brock and Onyx · Post Post #847 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:57 am

I suppose it's pretty obvious who's posting rn, so I guess I don't need to sign, right?

Titus · Post Post #848 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:57 am

In post 844, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 838, Shiro wrote:
In post 834, Alchemist21 wrote:Why don’t you believe the claim?
I am happy you understood that before I corrected it.

Because this is mastina, she has done that in the past before. She really isnt above claiming mason with her scum partner. It kinda bothers me that Titus defended it like that cause she would know that as well..
I believe Mastina would do that but not Elsa. Scum Elsa is more interested in making false associations with people who aren’t partners and WIFOMing the game.

True but Elsa could be mastina's beta. Unlikely and not worth pursuing but possible.

Titus · Post Post #849 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:58 am

In post 847, Brock and Onyx wrote:I suppose it's pretty obvious who's posting rn, so I guess I don't need to sign, right?

Sign once