If I were a vig...In post 1049, PenguinPower wrote:In post 1042, Psyche wrote:think everyone who's posted in the last few pages are probably townIn post 1043, Psyche wrote:i guess i have luv chenn pp
Partly because I can work with you, we've played together before, you're easy to understand. And yes...I am biased but a lot of people are biased.In post 1075, PenguinPower wrote:Why chenn?In post 924, Performer wrote:my strongest scumreads are still pikachu & chenn.
If you can't meta read me well then...In post 932, Performer wrote:that's funny because I myself can't meta read you that well, pp
...why do you trust me a lot?In post 952, Performer wrote:I trust pp a lot
In post 1087, chennisden wrote:do you realize i literally NEVER defend pikachu if i'm scum?
In post 1088, chennisden wrote:if im scum i just vote pikachu and say "hi pikachu is scum"
I can see a world where if you're both scum, then it makes sense for you to avoid the wagon.In post 1089, chennisden wrote:and if we're both scum then i am practically gamethrowing
chen , thoughts about this?In post 981, Psyche wrote:i think chenn is an ok lynch
haven't really taken the time to re-read things one last time yet though
thats five peopleIn post 1103, Performer wrote:thinking aloud: the above with "i guess i have luv chenn pp" along with the past # of pgs between nm/mary/etc and looking at the vcs, make me wonder about a luv, redem, psyche, nm, cdb type of team.
as appealing as that sounds, I think it's best to wait for cdb & uzi slots to be replaced. I don't see much point in flash wagoning either of those atmIn post 1106, schadd_ wrote:id still be into flashwagoning uzi
if someone is voted, the voter should be doing so because they're fine with the lynch for the day. Just because someone is scummy doesn't make it a better idea for them to be lynched over someone else. Given what's happened since cdb slot has posted & that luv (proposed flash wagon from schadd) has missed out on a bunch of posts ever since he last posted, I'll wait.In post 1108, Psyche wrote:if you think they're scum what does waiting for the replace do
I feel like lately scum has been very frequently fake-angle-shooting, and this fits in with that. Scum love to fake ellitells, meta, setup spec that gives them a reason to push someone as scum since they can always blame their 'bad premise' as a smokescreen rather than as a scum agenda and this very much fits into that. The only people he *thought* would even be able to check on the reviewers was you and schadd, and there's no reason to think he would have really expected either of you to push back against him on it.In post 1099, PenguinPower wrote:I don't get Performer's stance there, but I'm not sure it's scummy?
because you're getting the pika lynchIn post 1102, Performer wrote:In post 1087, chennisden wrote:do you realize i literally NEVER defend pikachu if i'm scum?In post 1088, chennisden wrote:if im scum i just vote pikachu and say "hi pikachu is scum"I can see a world where if you're both scum, then it makes sense for you to avoid the wagon.In post 1089, chennisden wrote:and if we're both scum then i am practically gamethrowing
But if you're town...why are you town reading pika?
also if I'm scum, why on earth would I go onto an entirely different wagon rather than just sit on pika and let someone quick hammer.
I don't know if it's scummy or not, but Performer's knowledge of this game seems to boil down to claimed knowledge of the type of game undisclosed reviewers, RC and Mastina, would approve and *reasons he won't go into* as stated in posts 867 and 1009In post 1099, PenguinPower wrote:Agree. I reviewed Mini Normal 1983 with both of them and it was included (mafia aligned).In post 1098, schadd_ wrote:i dont think either of them would push against UB but i wouldnt expect either to suggest it
I don't get Performer's stance there, but I'm not sure it's scummy? I would prefer him to answer my questions.
Who are you quoting, though?In post 1115, chennisden wrote:https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=51&t=79344
"chen is scummy for just coming up and, like, voting for this guy"
"oh wait he's scum"
???In post 1114, MaryJoLisa wrote:I don't know if it's scummy or not, but Performer's knowledge of this game seems to boil down to claimed knowledge of the type of game undisclosed reviewers, RC and Mastina, would approve and *reasons he won't go into* as stated in posts 867 and 1009In post 1099, PenguinPower wrote:Agree. I reviewed Mini Normal 1983 with both of them and it was included (mafia aligned).In post 1098, schadd_ wrote:i dont think either of them would push against UB but i wouldnt expect either to suggest it
I don't get Performer's stance there, but I'm not sure it's scummy? I would prefer him to answer my questions.
Performer has had no wagons on him so far and I think we should try this on for size: VOTE: Performer
this was the general gamestate of open 755In post 1117, MaryJoLisa wrote:Who are you quoting, though?In post 1115, chennisden wrote:https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=51&t=79344
"chen is scummy for just coming up and, like, voting for this guy"
"oh wait he's scum"
can you make the case for yourself having good readsIn post 1122, chennisden wrote:but MJL and DP town
