Mini Normal 2076: Game Over

[Detective Pikachu]

I think this might be the most fake scumread I have ever seen in the game of mafia.

[PenguinPower]

I didn't think CDB was town until nom repped in. My read on Nom is weak and entirely meta based, and that's why I said Nom agreeing with me like that concerns me.

[PenguinPower]

Aww...i wanted it

[Detective Pikachu]

I was in your three possible pairings. Sorting me should be a priority for town!pikachu especially now that the slot was replaced with someone a bit more talkative. Yet that didn't happen at all. Why?

This post just happened when nom joined the game yesterday and cdb wasn't even in my top three

You're going to need to explain this meta read on nom. Does nom make scumreads that read fake af?

[PenguinPower]

I can't atm.

I'd also rather Performer come back and do something.

[Detective Pikachu]

Spoiler:

Also, cdb's 130 call out of mary's 71 is odd to me. How is that anti town? the most I could get from that after rereading over and over, was a slight town tone. because it looks like she's simply wondering about the setup.

also want to hear more from lil uz & nm (who hasnt posted in over 2 days).

still want to see an answer to my question to schadd about mary.

I'm guessing nm's vote was on cdb? because that's the closest thing to a danny devito - cdb's profile photo lol

Lucky i don't know who's vote on chen that you're talking about . Mod can we get a vc?

I have pika and chen as the top 2 candidates .

Cdb i'm having some trouble sorting. Schadd interactions, such as his ones with pika, made me lean town pm him.

One of the problems that is helping scum is also that psyche/nm/cdb/luv haven't been easy to read.

So I want to see who the replacement will be for cdb (been over 6 days)

If pika somehow does flip green, looking at the vc and what's transpired itt - I would need to reevaluate nm/schadd/mary/cdb .

id still be into flashwagoning uzi

as appealing as that sounds, I think it's best to wait for cdb & uzi slots to be replaced. I don't see much point in flash wagoning either of those atm

if you think they're scum what does waiting for the replace do

if someone is voted, the voter should be doing so because they're fine with the lynch for the day. Just because someone is scummy doesn't make it a better idea for them to be lynched over someone else. Given what's happened since cdb slot has posted & that luv (proposed flash wagon from schadd) has missed out on a bunch of posts ever since he last posted, I'll wait.

Performer/nomnomnom looks great to me

Every single point Performer makes in his iso irt CDB is hedging, and he's constantly emphasizing he wants the replacement

Replacement gets here and Performer says nothing despite saying that's basically one of the things he was waiting on (although, it is the weekend, and nomnom has literally only been here for like a day)

And then nomnomnom pushes me with the word salad on the last page

Like, if I was town!nomnom, and I had a slot that had been basically saying "boy I really want to interact with that replacement" for almost the entire game, maybe I would... interact with that slot

but nomnomnom literally has not said Performer's name *until* it was presented in the context of my solve

and Performer, while he hasn't said almost anything since she replaced in, certainly hasn't even said nomnom's name to date or replied to any of her posts as far as I can tell

[Detective Pikachu]

Actually we can go either way here, I think this is 2/2. If I'm right and it is nomnomnom/Performer, then nomnomnom is trying to find a way to push my wagon since Performer had actually become tied

Vs. nomnomnom wking Performer? But that feels less likely; she's basically been avoiding any mention of him until literally right now and exclusively focusing on her chenni tunnel to avoid committing to reads on anyone else

[Vorkuta]

Some wise people told me not to do pre-flip associatives and all that stuff so.....
But let's see VOTE: Performer

[nomnomnom]

Like, if I was town!nomnom, and I had a slot that had been basically saying "boy I really want to interact with that replacement" for almost the entire game, maybe I would... interact with that slot

Except you are not me.

[nomnomnom]

You also can't accuse me of avoiding mentioning a slot when I've done the same with practically every slot in the game. That's selective argumentation.

[nomnomnom]

Performer having a wagon literally happened because you did the same to him as you did to me, which is why I have no faith in a Perf wagon right now.
I'm going to take a guess and saw that schadd wouldn't take off so you needed to jump on something else.

[MaryJoLisa]

I don't believe there are any other good choices that are going to get lynched before EOD

We're being stonewalled/corralled and I don't even think it's by scum tbh

You do realize that you are contributing to the gamestate I just complained about...right?

Okay, but when I tried moving my vote around to lend support to Nomnom to help him do his thing, you didn't much like that either.

[Detective Pikachu]

MJL what's your read on nomnom? You had CDB as null right?

[nomnomnom]

The very fact that your entire game so far has been pushing people that had some sort of scumread on you, instantly trying to discredit them, then try to push them out of the game should be alarming to anyone paying remotely any attention to this game. You missed my points entirely and instantly decided it was a "fake" thought and an opportunistic push.

You are literally trying to pit people against me because of a concern I had in your slot.

[Detective Pikachu]

You also can't accuse me of avoiding mentioning a slot when I've done the same with practically every slot in the game.

[MaryJoLisa]

MJL what's your read on nomnom? You had CDB as null right?

I don't even remember CDB.

Meh. I really don't know.

[nomnomnom]

keyword: one slot in particular

Perhaps town realizes what you are doing when it's the third time you try to use the tactic on someone this game. Just perhaps.

[Detective Pikachu]

which is why I have no faith in a Perf wagon right now

right but you *selected* one wagon over another with no read on Performer, without even saying his name this game by the time you decided to vote me. You saw two equal wagons, Penguin presented me as a compromise lynch between the two, and then found an incredibly fake reason to l-2 me

What's more, 1410 makes me think that this is even more fake:

Redemption:
Psyche:
Performer: Detective Pikachu, chennisden, MaryJoLisa
Not_Mafia:

Detective Pikachu: Not_Mafia, Redemption, schadd_

nomnomnom:
chennisden: nomnomnom, PenguinPower
LuckyOtter:
MaryJoLisa: LuckyOtter
Vorkuta:
Lil Uzi Vert:
PenguinPower:
schadd_: Vorkuta

Not Voting: Psyche, Lil Uzi Vert, Performer

This is the most awkward wagon out there.

Fuck I meant to highlight performer's wagon. I'm stupid lmao

In 1378 and 1379, you mean to imply that you don't like the Performer wagon. But you had just been saying:

Are you willing to get an UB claim out of this game?

which implies you were not strongly scumreading me, and indeed, 1380 and 1381 perform your apparent thought process:

Actually... Now that I think about it, one thing strikes me as strange when re-reading DP's iso really fast.

There's something that doesn't add up, and something should have happened, but it didn't.

I don't think schadd and redemption are scum together, but schadd/performer/NM seems fine, schadd/performer/MJL seems fine, schadd/performer/CDB seems fine.

Pikachu hasn't interacted with my slot, while he should be sorting it since he believes I could be in one of the pairings.

That's scum indicative.

Now do I want to risk making this poor sod flip town UB? That's the question.

So you began by shading the Performer wagon, *before* you scumread me, but now in 1410 you're saying that you doubt the Performer wagon *because* of me, but then, why are you doubting the Performer wagon in 1378? That's the first time you even mention his name. You're reconstructing the narrative out of order to fit your new fake thought process lol

[nomnomnom]

Vorkuta's slot worries me, I have to say.

[Detective Pikachu]

MJL what's your read on nomnom? You had CDB as null right?

I don't even remember CDB.

Meh. I really don't know.

You had CDB listed as null and you've been online. Do you think that nomnomnom therefore should be scumreading you since you haven't really been asking her questions or engaging her during the weekend?

[nomnomnom]

@dp the amount of misrepping in that wall should be criminal

[Detective Pikachu]

Some wise people told me not to do pre-flip associatives and all that stuff so.....
But let's see VOTE: Performer

Easty what's your read of nomnom rn?

[nomnomnom]

The game is going to go nowhere if all you do is spam pages and pages and pages of "HEY SLOT X, WHAT'S YOUR READ ON NOMNOM (THEY ARE SCUM BY THE WAY)" then just continually individually flood every one of them with a reason not to trust me. That's just stupid.

[nomnomnom]

Everyone knows you think you are scum, what you're doing is creating absolute garbage content.

[nomnomnom]

You think I am scum*