In post 1427, nomnomnom wrote:There's an amount of misrepping I will accept because I accept this is a game of mafia and people will read things that people don't say because the brain can come to stupid conclusions when you are in a situation of constant stress and anxiety but you clearly reached the point where it's acceptable and talking with you will only result in pages of content where you continually read what YOU want to read. So I really advise you to stop and stop assuming everything I do is with scum intent and to stop putting words and intentions in my mouth. This is honestly gross.
You make this post, but right now I am trying to reconcile *your attitude toward how you conceive of your own townplay* with 1381
In post 1381, nomnomnom wrote:Pikachu hasn't interacted with my slot, while he should be sorting it since he believes I could be in one of the pairings.
That's scum indicative.
When that is not how you conceive of your own townplay in 1408 and 1409, and furthermore make the point that it is wrong to assume that other people will approach the game in the same way
In post 1408, nomnomnom wrote: In post 1405, Detective Pikachu wrote:Like, if I was town!nomnom, and I had a slot that had been basically saying "boy I really want to interact with that replacement" for almost the entire game, maybe I would... interact with that slot
Except you are not me.
In post 1409, nomnomnom wrote:You also can't accuse me of avoiding mentioning a slot when I've done the same with practically every slot in the game. That's selective argumentation.
So as far as I can tell, not only are your reasons for supposedly scumreading me and pushing me to l-2 fake, but they are irreconcilable both for how *you imagine yourself approaching town play* and for *your own expectations for the range of town play vs. scum play*
This is a scum perspective slip and a failed attempt to justify an opportunistic vote