Nero Cain
u r a person 2
With
Day 1 ends in
I'm not saying I don't think either of those options are right. I was saying that I think both of these options are bad.In post 657, u r a person 2 wrote:I guess you kind of answered it. I think vorkuta is lynchbait this game a lot of the time. I don't know if it's being pushed by town or by scum rn tho.In post 545, NerfedBuJ wrote:So it is strange. Either he is scum's pick for day 1 mislynch or he managed to pocket me despite being even more annoying than usual. (No offence vork it's not you it's just how you post)
I don't like either of those options.
Is there another option that you would like better? It's weird to say that you think everything points to these two options but that you don't think either of those options are right
This might be the first thing you've said that's pretty townie, because it's not something I would typically expect scum to come up with for a fake case.In post 670, u r a person 2 wrote:I guess. That whole post pings me tho. Like, the idea of rushing a post in the middle of the meeting to make sure your town read gets out there a week or whatever before eod? I see a scum motivation for that, but not really a town one outside of exuberance for playing the game~In post 651, skitter30 wrote:i can see buj sincerely believing that policying the miller claim day before lylo is optimal
(i just saw him park on someone he was townreading because they claimed scum so)
I could see scum wanting to make sure they were out ahead of them becoming a consensus town read for credit tho
do you think I'm way off base here?
The problem is that since writing hat post I’ve had an urge to watch that music video, but I can’t remember the actual name of the 80s song, just the girl in the videoIn post 720, Detective Pikachu wrote:I think it means he's taking off the hot nurse uniform and putting on his pajamas
WOOOOOOOOOOWIn post 730, Flubbernugget wrote:I know everybody has forgotten page 3 by now but why was cinnamon discussing their modifiers?????
I think I can't reasonably assess Skitter's alignment by considering that push alone. This is the kind of thing you look back to in a few days to see what was up with that imo.In post 660, u r a person 2 wrote:If Vorkuta is town, would you say that makes skitter town?In post 564, nomnomnom wrote:I guess I'll give Vork this point, it's that people only followed Vork's case when Skitter appeared in the thread and made that case despite me presenting the exact same arguments. THAT is strange.
Like, is it some combination of scum and town following town skitter? or do you think the same thing happens in a world with scum!skitter?
In post 661, u r a person 2 wrote:wait, whyIn post 567, nomnomnom wrote:tbh that fact alone means that if vork is actually town, teacher is probably 100% scum here. And even then that kind of observation makes me think that it could be an equally good lynch for today.
I agree but the fact that teacher sheeped with extremely weak reasons is kind of the main thing that drew my vote there. That's why I voted him and not Dunn, who had a previous case on Vork.In post 662, u r a person 2 wrote:??In post 571, nomnomnom wrote:When you have two people making the same case but the one that was made later down the road with the exact same argument has a player joining it simply because it actually took off this time, that's scummy. And that's what teacher did here.
you were only voting vorkuta for like 50 posts, and teacher had no posts during that time
real life is a thing
I have never played a single time with you and from an outsider perspective this is simply a naked vote and sheeping the more popular wagon.In post 686, teacher wrote:I absolutely agree.In post 638, skitter30 wrote:honestly i'm kinda surprised that the wagon didn't go higher - a lot of people have proclaimed vork to be a scumread but have expressed reluctance in actually voting him
Vork started taking off, getting to four votes and Salad indicating interest in going to five, around 587. But then Salad and Nom switch the momentum to me -- for joining them on someone they scumread (and, in noms case, was also voting).
I absolutely agree that same reads=/ same alignment. But the logic here is escaping me. I think I had been pretty clear from the start that I agreed with Cinnamon/Urap/Nerfed's take on the miller claim, and didnt like Vorkuta/Nero's push. Once Nero town-told, my progression to Vork would seem to be natural (as indeed it was). If Nom really had been trying to get inside my head, I think this would have been clear.
As a result, I think Nom's push at me is a bit of counterwagoning from the one other active slot I didnt call out earlier as town or scum.
This was supposed to be closely followed by a reads list I'm half way through. But unfortunately irl stuff got in the way, then I got distracted and it's still only like half done rn.In post 659, u r a person 2 wrote:Why did you choose to make this the subject of your first post after 10+ pages of content?In post 557, EvilDeanius wrote:Because you get the loud/good players out of the way early, so you can mislynch the lurky players later with little resistance. You always try to mislynch/kill those with thread presence early.In post 550, nomnomnom wrote:Why would scum pick town!vorkuta as a day 1 mislynch? I mean objectively speaking if you were scum here, wouldn't your mind go towards the more lurk-ish people, where it's easier to make a case on? Because that's definitely easier than to go against a player like vorkuta here.In post 545, NerfedBuJ wrote:Either he is scum's pick for day 1 mislynch
This is a good observation insofar as people pushing me for content when I don't really feel like doing things on day 1 tends to work, but I don't think it's a great reason to "gut" scumread meIn post 735, EvilDeanius wrote:There's not alot there that I particularly dislike but there was a point where people seemed to start talking about him for lack of proper content, at which point he then switched to pushing on others who also hadn't done anything/alot. The timing just seems like a deflection to me, it seems off.
I'm not really townreading himIn post 706, Nero Cain wrote:
I'm sorry, but this just feels so much like a scum strat.Why is he town again?
Ngl this post kinda makes me want to vote u ...In post 707, u r a person 2 wrote:I'm not even really trying yet, skitter.In post 705, skitter30 wrote:Urap how are you reading me?
I think you're easily in your town and scum ranges
I didnt really see that post as being townie tbh; dont think it's a weird thing for scum to fake either reallyIn post 726, NerfedBuJ wrote:This might be the first thing you've said that's pretty townie, because it's not something I would typically expect scum to come up with for a fake case.
@nom: still dont really understand the 'teacher voted the wagon after it started taking off' narrativeIn post 636, skitter30 wrote:tbf the two people voting when u pushed it were {you/dunn}In post 571, nomnomnom wrote:When you have two people making the same case but the one that was made later down the road with the exact same argument has a player joining it simply because it actually took off this time, that's scummy. And that's what teacher did here.In post 569, Detective Pikachu wrote:In post 564, nomnomnom wrote:I guess I'll give Vork this point, it's that people only followed Vork's case when Skitter appeared in the thread and made that case despite me presenting the exact same arguments. THAT is strange.I feel like I missed a post or something, how does that make teacher scum?In post 567, nomnomnom wrote:tbh that fact alone means that if vork is actually town, teacher is probably 100% scum here. And even then that kind of observation makes me think that it could be an equally good lynch for today.
the people voting when i pushed it were {me/you/dunn} until teacher voted
so i'm not sure that it really 'took off' before teacher voted there given that the wagon comp was exactly the same + me
i kinda think that a lot of pika's posts are like ... subtly townieIn post 735, EvilDeanius wrote:Lynch pool for me as of rn is Teacher/Pika. I've not really disliked anyone on teacher's wagon so I can see it being pure, whereas Pika is kinda just gut atm. There's not alot there that I particularly dislike but there was a point where people seemed to start talking about him for lack of proper content, at which point he then switched to pushing on others who also hadn't done anything/alot. The timing just seems like a deflection to me, it seems off.
the greater point is that teacher is sheeping with his vote here and I feel it reinforces NC's point earlier about his vote serving no purpose. He gave no justification to be on Vork's wagon here which is relevant when we're starting to push Vork together yeah? On retrospective the thing urap said about the little amount of time there was between me pushing the wagon, unvoting, then rejoining the wagon when you revoted him and people following it was very little.In post 740, skitter30 wrote:@nom: still dont really understand the 'teacher voted the wagon after it started taking off' narrative
urgh nonsense wordingIn post 742, nomnomnom wrote:On retrospective the thing urap said about the little amount of time there was between me pushing the wagon, unvoting, then rejoining the wagon when you revoted him and people following it was very little.
In post 731, Vorkuta wrote:WOOOOOOOOOOWIn post 730, Flubbernugget wrote:I know everybody has forgotten page 3 by now but why was cinnamon discussing their modifiers?????
I'm not following your issue here.In post 732, Saladman27 wrote:Flubber, please reread the game, even your drunk posts.
If one of buj and skitter flip scum I'd push on this as implicating the otherIn post 305, nomnomnom wrote:how is skitter in your town pool by the wayIn post 292, NerfedBuJ wrote:Page 12 ego game solve for the post-game brag:
Town: nomnom, cinnamon, skitter, dunn, nero cain, evil D, flubber, vork
Leftovers: urap, saladman, teacher, Pikachu
VOTE: Pikachu