In post 567, Cinnamon wrote: In post 547, Menalque wrote: In post 537, skitter30 wrote:@menalque: an example would be his whole exchange with u regarding the cop/doc/neighborizer thing - he thinks he found an inconsistency in your approach to the game and is using his quetions to try to understand your thought process
yeah, I agree that was townie, the problem I have with it is that it only emerged at all after someone was actually pushing and I think that doing something like that is defo within the capabilities of scum!luv
Here again, I don't see it. The person pushing LUV here was you I believe? Wouldn't that make it equally as townie or more townie for him to be trying to figure you out?
Yeah, it was. Here’s my logic: luv does very little all game, avoids getting on wagons, doesn’t really offer anything in the way of analysis, complains about the gamestate then doesn’t really try to do anything to improve it himself
Then he jumps on pk v quickly, before rounding off there to jump on me after I call him out
It’s only after this that a couple of votes head his way, and only after that that he starts doing anything meaningfully townie (trying to figure out my thought process around pk and the doc claim)
I don’t see how him only towning it up at all after pressure is town indicative when everything before is scum indicative