same here!In post 645, Dannflor wrote:I excessively don't like Chemist as a DEB wagon alternative
down with thisDannflor wrote:VOTE: ZZZX
VOTE: ZZZX
same here!In post 645, Dannflor wrote:I excessively don't like Chemist as a DEB wagon alternative
down with thisDannflor wrote:VOTE: ZZZX
RC.In post 633, Binary Star wrote:I remember someone once had a signature about how coming up with a good fake claim takes eons but actually claiming is really easy.
Being a huge ponce and galloping around your REALLY COOL ROLE YOU CAN'T CLAIM BECAUSE THEY'LL KILL YOU FOR IT is functionally the same as CLAIMING except it denies town info. Please continue to lay down those good good hits at L-1, I sure do love them.
You signed your own death warrant for playing like garbage, DEB.
Sorry not sorry.
-White
YesIn post 594, Chemist1422 wrote:Open 755 was 2FC9 right?In post 570, NerfedBuJ wrote:Why day 2 when we can do it now
VOTE: Chemist
I feel he's much less involved than open 755.
Post 551 is after some break but it is mostly stating some very uncontroversial, easy to come up with, LAMIST things that don't actually tell us much about him or any of the slots he mentioned.
Also the RVS posting kinda sounds like a cheeky scum entrance.
Why?In post 604, Dannflor wrote:but chemist is town?In post 575, NerfedBuJ wrote:I think chemist lynch would be better though
In post 655, NerfedBuJ wrote:Still though something is just off with this whole day 1 in terms of wagons.
Pine said it was DGB though?In post 652, Arkham Asylum wrote:RC.In post 633, Binary Star wrote:I remember someone once had a signature about how coming up with a good fake claim takes eons but actually claiming is really easy.
Being a huge ponce and galloping around your REALLY COOL ROLE YOU CAN'T CLAIM BECAUSE THEY'LL KILL YOU FOR IT is functionally the same as CLAIMING except it denies town info. Please continue to lay down those good good hits at L-1, I sure do love them.
You signed your own death warrant for playing like garbage, DEB.
Sorry not sorry.
-White
~H
No, it was definitely RC who said that.In post 657, Egix96 wrote:Pine said it was DGB though?In post 652, Arkham Asylum wrote:RC.In post 633, Binary Star wrote:I remember someone once had a signature about how coming up with a good fake claim takes eons but actually claiming is really easy.
Being a huge ponce and galloping around your REALLY COOL ROLE YOU CAN'T CLAIM BECAUSE THEY'LL KILL YOU FOR IT is functionally the same as CLAIMING except it denies town info. Please continue to lay down those good good hits at L-1, I sure do love them.
You signed your own death warrant for playing like garbage, DEB.
Sorry not sorry.
-White
~H
VOTE: Z3X
No, just RC. I think I was in the game where he coined it and later I remember reading it in someone’s sig, quoting him.In post 659, Egix96 wrote:Eh maybe it was both of 'em, what do I know.
I’m okay with voting, not hammering thoughChickadee wrote:I'm kind of not ok with voting someone on VLA, just on the basis that they're not here to defend themselves.
DEB - did you notice XXXZ was on VLA before voting?
All of my rapid-fire readslists suck and I’m kinda busy and can’t go in-depth into stuff until this afternoonIn post 671, Arkham Asylum wrote:Chemist1422, can you give a reads list so I can see where you're at?
-The Joker
No I didn’tIn post 669, Chickadee wrote:I'm kind of not ok with voting someone on VLA, just on the basis that they're not here to defend themselves.
DEB - did you notice XXXZ was on VLA before voting?