you keep saying things but you keep ignoring my question.In post 3719, pisskop wrote:youre playing this awful pushy nero.In post 3711, Nero Cain wrote:Is this an important question?
Thats a bad look for you. There might be something to this 'nero is scum' talk Ive been hearing. This isnt your town personality.
Everyone else has the reading comprehension required to glean the answer to this. Stop being a slimey shitIn post 3725, Nero Cain wrote:you keep saying things but you keep ignoring my question.In post 3719, pisskop wrote:youre playing this awful pushy nero.In post 3711, Nero Cain wrote:Is this an important question?
Thats a bad look for you. There might be something to this 'nero is scum' talk Ive been hearing. This isnt your town personality.
WHY DID YOU TOWN READ, DUNN?
EXACTLY! Thats another reason Skitter is scum. You called me town multiple times but she went out of her way to selectively quote where you said I was only a "bad lynch"
this is not a hard question and I'm not sure why you are avoiding it.In post 3727, pisskop wrote:Everyone else has the reading comprehension required to glean the answer to this. Stop being a slimey shitIn post 3725, Nero Cain wrote:you keep saying things but you keep ignoring my question.In post 3719, pisskop wrote:youre playing this awful pushy nero.In post 3711, Nero Cain wrote:Is this an important question?
Thats a bad look for you. There might be something to this 'nero is scum' talk Ive been hearing. This isnt your town personality.
WHY DID YOU TOWN READ, DUNN?
Oh, do explainIn post 3710, nomnomnom wrote:That {DP Skitter you} triplet really needs solving to you and honestly the fact that both you and skitter are trying to get out of that is making me worried.In post 3709, pisskop wrote:vote vork with me plz and thank you
Yes can we do a nero thing now?In post 3719, pisskop wrote:youre playing this awful pushy nero.In post 3711, Nero Cain wrote:Is this an important question?
Thats a bad look for you. There might be something to this 'nero is scum' talk Ive been hearing. This isnt your town personality.
I already explained that to you skittIn post 3730, skitter30 wrote:Oh, do explainIn post 3710, nomnomnom wrote:That {DP Skitter you} triplet really needs solving to you and honestly the fact that both you and skitter are trying to get out of that is making me worried.In post 3709, pisskop wrote:vote vork with me plz and thank you
? Not sure what you're talking about here?In post 3728, Nero Cain wrote:EXACTLY! Thats another reason Skitter is scum. You called me town multiple times but she went out of her way to selectively quote where you said I was only a "bad lynch"
yea Im kind of feeling that.In post 3731, skitter30 wrote:Yes can we do a nero thing now?In post 3719, pisskop wrote:youre playing this awful pushy nero.In post 3711, Nero Cain wrote:Is this an important question?
Thats a bad look for you. There might be something to this 'nero is scum' talk Ive been hearing. This isnt your town personality.
I meant explain the part where you think i'm trying to 'get out of it'In post 3732, nomnomnom wrote:I already explained that to you skittIn post 3730, skitter30 wrote:Oh, do explainIn post 3710, nomnomnom wrote:That {DP Skitter you} triplet really needs solving to you and honestly the fact that both you and skitter are trying to get out of that is making me worried.In post 3709, pisskop wrote:vote vork with me plz and thank you
Since when did having different reads mean that someone is trying to either weasel or is not town?In post 3736, nomnomnom wrote:Trying to lynch saladman and nero and townreading the two people in the triplet?
Because the movements are bad and fmpov at least one of you is scum.In post 3739, pisskop wrote:Since when did having different reads mean that someone is trying to either weasel or is not town?In post 3736, nomnomnom wrote:Trying to lynch saladman and nero and townreading the two people in the triplet?
No, i'm trying to lynch people i think are scumIn post 3743, nomnomnom wrote:No I think you're trying to get out of my PoE because it destroys you in the long run and you're trying to extend the lynchpool to at least one person that I am confident is town.
You 3 cannot be all town. I refuse to believe that.
NoIn post 3744, pisskop wrote:Id policy lynch nom just to set a precedent against such play
Remember the last time you suggested mass claiming for no fucking reason?In post 3745, Vorkuta wrote:Mass claim > potential miller policy
I think that it's the only play that doesn't result in this back and forth reasoning/rock and hard place brickwall that we keep on running into.