'Cause I still think you're protecting your PR partner.In post 1798, Gamma Emerald wrote:Btw why don't you put your vote where your mouth isIn post 1795, Pink Ball wrote:I'm ok with Gamma today, he's the most annoying of the scumteam that's for sure
Bitch
Oh I didn't took the "bitch" personal 'cause I didn't think you were bothered by something I said, I'm sorry! I meant it as a compliment actually, like I don't want to have scum!you alive 'cause you can make fake associations that are dangerous.In post 1801, Gamma Emerald wrote:Fyi PB I took you calling me annoying a bit personal because I saw someone call out who you are in another game
Your associations in Merchant's Daughter were essential for your team to win, and I think that - even if I don't consider myself good at reading you - that was the first game I was absolutely wrong about you.In post 1804, Gamma Emerald wrote:I only just found out recently tho
Also thanks for the compliment I guess.
Yeah that game was pretty good but the goal was truly to fool Krazy because up to then I don't recall having pulled the wool over his eyes even if I may have won against toen!him as scum beforeIn post 1806, Pink Ball wrote:Your associations in Merchant's Daughter were essential for your team to win, and I think that - even if I don't consider myself good at reading you - that was the first game I was absolutely wrong about you.In post 1804, Gamma Emerald wrote:I only just found out recently tho
Also thanks for the compliment I guess.
This is really bad reasoning. There are a few people in this game that play way too many games and you're choosing the most convenient one to push.In post 1755, Pink Ball wrote:Duuuuude
The guy says "like I have to have some sort of priority list, and I can't have every game be #1" but he joins another game in the queue?
Come the fuck on, he's not even playing this game.
He's not being lynchbaity 'cause he's avoiding the thread.
This is a valid take.In post 1781, Gamma Emerald wrote:Did someone see the action Tim took? Otherwise the confirmation is hearsay currently. I don't wanna bethat guybut this shouldn't be a done deal unless there's extra evidence.
In post 1751, EspressoPatronum wrote:Hmm, ofrhz is at L-2 I think. I'll wait for a bit, but count me as anunofficial Ofrhz vote.
This timing is pinging me quite hard.
You spent last page talking about why Chemist was a better lynch than Gamma. Why switch here?In post 1800, Pink Ball wrote:'Cause I still think you're protecting your PR partner.In post 1798, Gamma Emerald wrote:Btw why don't you put your vote where your mouth isIn post 1795, Pink Ball wrote:I'm ok with Gamma today, he's the most annoying of the scumteam that's for sure
Bitch
Rude. I'm bitchin'.
VOTE: Gamma Emerald
This is Pokemon Ruby, pal, not Emerald.
If scum want to leave conftown alive until lylo they are welcome to do so.In post 1813, Klick wrote:Pikachu, what are you going to do to play around the fact that when Gamma flips town, the scumteam is going to leave you alive to LyLo so that people get paranoid and lynch you?
Is this in regards to not thinking you're confirmed town? Because I basically agree with what he's said there.In post 1819, Detective Pikachu wrote:Gamma is ignoring mech,
I mean, this is blatantly false and if I were at a computer I could show you several quotes that shut this down. Just read through Gamma's ISO.failing to solve for town,
'bizarre overreactions'? What specifically are you seeing that you find scummy there?and exhibiting bizarre overreactions to a range of people pushing him.
Why do you think Chemist is scum?I don't really have a problem seeing him as scum, and he's refusing to join on chemist which would be the next best candidate for scum to me right now.
I don't think I've said a word about Gamma's case on ofrhz?As for "lazy lynch" ofrhz is basically absent from the thread and is almost universally pushed in every game she is in always. So who exactly is pushing a "lazy" lynch here? Oh wait, that's right, that's Gamma's top scumread, the one with the case you're in love with.
In post 95, Detective Pikachu wrote:In post 23, Klick wrote:VOTE: Detective Pikachu
If you're just going to talk in 'Pika-pika!'s all day, we have no choice but to policy lynch you.In post 54, Klick wrote:[citation needed]In post 52, Creature wrote:Here's one advice: we gotta start acting early if we want to have a shot of winning as town here.
Town that take too long to react tend to lose.
Seriously, this has probably been said in every game I've popped my head into in the past five years, and I've seen no evidence that there's credit to it. We're here to have fun! It's been less than a day, there's nothing to be worried about just yet.
Though my vote on Detective Pikachu was semi-serious, and I'll give a cookie to the first person who can tell me why.In post 58, Klick wrote:Can you see why I might have gotten an early scumread on DP based on their posting thus far?In post 60, Klick wrote:Sorry: I have a light scumread on Detective Pikachu. Can you spot why?In post 74, Klick wrote:I know it was RVS, but can you talk to me about why you decided to vote me here, Pikachu? Because your post doesn't have a reason, silly or otherwise.In post 11, Detective Pikachu wrote:Hello, partner!
VOTE: Klick
I like the memes of this list but I am also sad because I wanted to play with Dr WormIn post 87, Klick wrote:This is why I have a scumread on Pikachu.In post 74, Klick wrote:I know it was RVS, but can you talk to me about why you decided to vote me here, Pikachu? Because your post doesn't have a reason, silly or otherwise.In post 11, Detective Pikachu wrote:Hello, partner!
VOTE: Klick
I like the memes of this list but I am also sad because I wanted to play with Dr WormIn post 92, Klick wrote:I'd rather get any response from Pikachu before laying all my cards on the table!VOTE: KlickIn post 94, Klick wrote:Then why not say this at the time? I found your vote odd because there was zero explanation behind it. It seemed like it was placed with the intent of drawing no attention, as opposed to starting discussion.I voted you because a wagon with three votes is more interesting than a wagon with two votes.
In post 101, Detective Pikachu wrote:Your pressure being you spamming the thread asking someone on v/la why they voted you in rvs? That's not pressure that's fluffposting. You've basically been exclusively asking me one pointless question that has an obvious answer.In post 98, Klick wrote:No worries
Pikachu's my best lead atm. His response to my pressure hasn't been a good look.
You know I'm glad you brought this up.
