Newbie 1943: Crosswords (Game Over)

[Thespio]

Explain this pro SE strat to me

[Thespio]

Anyone else on, anyone find this even a little convincing?

[TemporalLich]

I dont buy it even a little, your an SE why are you claiming even a little, if you knew someone was fake claiming as a cop, why not investigate them at night make sure they arent town and hard claim D2?

I had to claim because I was run up to L-1 with intent, plus I didn't believe phone's claim was serious.

[Thespio]

I dont buy it even a little, your an SE why are you claiming even a little, if you knew someone was fake claiming as a cop, why not investigate them at night make sure they arent town and hard claim D2?

I had to claim because I was run up to L-1 with intent, plus I didn't believe phone's claim was serious.

WOA WOA WOA, you didnt believe phones claim was serious? why didnt you question the play? you are cop, you know he isnt the cop, it should have been something you were all over. To me that looks like a last ditch effort to live, it was mid day. being L-1 doent mean you give up a PR day 1. it especially doesnt mean you hard claim later when someone brings you back up.

[TemporalLich]

um... I said phone's claim wasn't a cop claim in 43

[Thespio]

um... I said phone's claim wasn't a cop claim in 43

And you didnt push him at all, you dismissed a false claim? more importantly you soft claimed and as soon as I brought up your scummy posts you just out and hard claimed. You know what I think? you are scum, you soft claimed to get clear, and hopefully get a CC so when you die you would trade for a PR. Theres no other logic behind you:

Someone fake claims
you are that role and you ignore them
you get pressured
you soft claim
someone brings you back up
you hard claim


Heres what I would expect:

someone fake claims
you push them because you are that role
you get pressured
you arent bad and communicate/possibly fake claim as VT
someone brings you back up
you discuss your prior behavior without any kind of claim


nothing you are doing makes sense.

[Thespio]

um... I said phone's claim wasn't a cop claim in 43

Also that isnt what you said, you were indicating a selfvote is scum, you didn't start any discussion on it. Why if you are cop did you not discuss the fake claim????

[Thespio]

yeah my vote isnt moving, You are not cop, My guess is there is a mafia RB, and you are claiming a role that exists 2/3 of the time. you want a CC so you can RB the cop. and kill someone else, effectively canceling out the cop. You are likely not the RB, as you made the claim.

[Cyan Talon]

yeah my vote isnt moving, You are not cop, My guess is there is a mafia RB, and you are claiming a role that exists 2/3 of the time. you want a CC so you can RB the cop. and kill someone else, effectively canceling out the cop. You are likely not the RB, as you made the claim.

Post 893 has some information that would argue otherwise.

[Cyan Talon]

yeah my vote isnt moving, You are not cop, My guess is there is a mafia RB, and you are claiming a role that exists 2/3 of the time. you want a CC so you can RB the cop. and kill someone else, effectively canceling out the cop. You are likely not the RB, as you made the claim.

Post 893 has some information that would argue otherwise.

um, sorry, i meant 892. whoops

anyway, consider what i'm implying behind my statement. it would tell you that there likely isn't a Mafia RB if TL is lying with his cop claim

[Thespio]

yeah my vote isnt moving, You are not cop, My guess is there is a mafia RB, and you are claiming a role that exists 2/3 of the time. you want a CC so you can RB the cop. and kill someone else, effectively canceling out the cop. You are likely not the RB, as you made the claim.

Post 893 has some information that would argue otherwise.

um, sorry, i meant 892. whoops

anyway, consider what i'm implying behind my statement. it would tell you that there likely isn't a Mafia RB if TL is lying with his cop claim

what are you implying? that you are a PR too? because if you are stop. Otherwise you are willing to accept a claim, even though a fake one has already been made. Are you not curious why a PR wouldnt interrogate a fake claim, or atleast ask them a question? also why hard claim when no one asks for it? we had a soft claim, it satisfied everyone apparently up to this point, why be explicit?

[Thespio]

@Cyan, you TR everyone except Lich?

[Thespio]

@MOD Can we get a VC please?

[cyrus62]

i keep asking for vote count and deadline update but i havent got it yet i think we are down to 4 and half hours

[cyrus62]

and cyan is at l1 not that i wanted to but no one seemd to want to vote any one else

[Thespio]

Cyrus, how do you feel about this claim D1 from soft to hard?

[cyrus62]

i was very upset that town forced a pr clime on d1 even voiced it

[cyrus62]

serea nd spangled forced lich to clime at intent or be lynch they tried to stop at soft

[Thespio]

i was very upset that town forced a pr clime on d1 even voiced it

Lets say its you, you are Cop, you get pressured D1, do you soft claim, hard claim, or fake claim VT?

[cyrus62]

vt dul

[cyrus62]

always vt unless you can find scum then you hard

[cyrus62]

letting the cat out of the bag neffs the pr

[Thespio]

right, now the person who claimed is supposed to be experienced enough to know that so lets say they arent cop, what are they, who benefits from that claim? we can talk about the other situation in a sec.

[cyrus62]

the way i see it now the cops been tag d1 scum now have edge with only 4 hours and we dont know who is who but they know the cop so now they just have to think or is most likely the other pr if there is one cuse cop could be alone . and if it is alone then they just have to sniff till they find thire isnt one and in case kill the cop now the cop cant find scum if there is a rb.

[cyrus62]

so what good is a cop if taged on day 1?