Role Call I (Game Over)

Vecna · Post Post #1875 (ISO) » Fri Jul 19, 2019 8:38 am

In post 1868, CheekyTeeky wrote:I might be wrong about vecna/pops not being on the same team.

We are on the same team

AP · Post Post #1876 (ISO) » Fri Jul 19, 2019 8:39 am

In post 1871, CheekyTeeky wrote:AP why were you defending me from lynch when I wasn't active?

It was a mistake that I'm never ever going to repeat. Never again consider someone's feelings being always the early lynch. I do sincerely apologize for keeping you alive and elongating the day.

popsofctown · Post Post #1877 (ISO) » Fri Jul 19, 2019 8:39 am

I replaced in for scum!RC in Hope Plus One like 3 months ago

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #1878 (ISO) » Fri Jul 19, 2019 8:40 am

In post 1873, AP wrote:
In post 1864, Gamma Emerald wrote:If I made a proposal with pops as the lynch would anyone vote For
I would. I'm not lynching you, Nero or Jingle, and that's it. I prefer not lynching Creature either, but I need him to talk more to see if that's true.

Oh, and speaking of "trust tells".. it used to be that RC only replaces out as TOWN. I don't know if that's still the case though.

Momo seemed to think that RC had repped out as scum before which is the thing about momo that makes me hesitate. If RC slot flips green at some point I'd relook at that early 1v1. Momo has largely died off which could point to early scum momentum. That read is tabled for late game though.

AP · Post Post #1879 (ISO) » Fri Jul 19, 2019 8:41 am

In post 1877, popsofctown wrote:I replaced in for scum!RC in Hope Plus One like 3 months ago

OK. So he changed that meta.

Jingle · Post Post #1880 (ISO) » Fri Jul 19, 2019 8:41 am

Vecna, why is AP scum?

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #1881 (ISO) » Fri Jul 19, 2019 8:42 am

In post 1876, AP wrote:
In post 1871, CheekyTeeky wrote:AP why were you defending me from lynch when I wasn't active?
It was a mistake that I'm never ever going to repeat. Never again consider someone's feelings being always the early lynch. I do sincerely apologize for keeping you alive and elongating the day.

Why? Why would you have wanted a quick day vs a high info day?

AP · Post Post #1882 (ISO) » Fri Jul 19, 2019 8:43 am

In post 1881, CheekyTeeky wrote:
In post 1876, AP wrote:
In post 1871, CheekyTeeky wrote:AP why were you defending me from lynch when I wasn't active?
It was a mistake that I'm never ever going to repeat. Never again consider someone's feelings being always the early lynch. I do sincerely apologize for keeping you alive and elongating the day.
Why? Why would you have wanted a quick day vs a high info day?

Are you stupid? I din't. But you're making me regret it.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #1883 (ISO) » Fri Jul 19, 2019 8:43 am

In post 1872, CheekyTeeky wrote:I could see you in a team with Gamma and PK but that's less likely than my other thoughts right now.

PK bleeds obvtown lol

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #1884 (ISO) » Fri Jul 19, 2019 8:45 am

In post 1883, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 1872, CheekyTeeky wrote:I could see you in a team with Gamma and PK but that's less likely than my other thoughts right now.
PK bleeds obvtown lol

Yes PK is a slot I townread I'm just saying that AP could be teamed with others imo not all associatives nullify that possibility.

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #1885 (ISO) » Fri Jul 19, 2019 8:47 am

In post 1882, AP wrote:
In post 1881, CheekyTeeky wrote:
In post 1876, AP wrote:
In post 1871, CheekyTeeky wrote:AP why were you defending me from lynch when I wasn't active?
It was a mistake that I'm never ever going to repeat. Never again consider someone's feelings being always the early lynch. I do sincerely apologize for keeping you alive and elongating the day.
Why? Why would you have wanted a quick day vs a high info day?
Are you stupid? I din't. But you're making me regret it.

No I'm suspicious. I cant work out if you're pocketing me or doing the omgus thing like in that disaster game we threw. Its rational to consider both possibilities.

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #1886 (ISO) » Fri Jul 19, 2019 8:50 am

Jingle has a point about the suspicion towards AP - it was too easy to divert a lynch there.

popsofctown · Post Post #1887 (ISO) » Fri Jul 19, 2019 8:52 am

Do you mean it's too easy to lynch AP or too easy not to lynch AP? It feels much like the former to me which is why my antsiness over it keeps slowly growing

I'd rather lynch you if I had to pick but I know you're not into that

Or LUV who is similar

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #1888 (ISO) » Fri Jul 19, 2019 8:54 am

LUV can go but I'd rather lynch you or vecna instead of the low info slots.

popsofctown · Post Post #1889 (ISO) » Fri Jul 19, 2019 8:56 am

well thank god town!Cheeky would have half a decent read somewhere

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #1890 (ISO) » Fri Jul 19, 2019 8:57 am

I'm getting there.

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #1891 (ISO) » Fri Jul 19, 2019 8:57 am

VOTE: Against

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #1892 (ISO) » Fri Jul 19, 2019 9:01 am

Creature do you have any reads yet?

AP · Post Post #1893 (ISO) » Fri Jul 19, 2019 9:06 am

In post 1885, CheekyTeeky wrote:
In post 1882, AP wrote:
In post 1881, CheekyTeeky wrote:
In post 1876, AP wrote:
In post 1871, CheekyTeeky wrote:AP why were you defending me from lynch when I wasn't active?
It was a mistake that I'm never ever going to repeat. Never again consider someone's feelings being always the early lynch. I do sincerely apologize for keeping you alive and elongating the day.
Why? Why would you have wanted a quick day vs a high info day?
Are you stupid? I din't. But you're making me regret it.
No I'm suspicious. I cant work out if you're pocketing me or doing the omgus thing like in that disaster game we threw. Its rational to consider both possibilities.

No it's not. If I was scum and you were town I had no reason to fight against your lynch when almost everyone else was ok with it. You weren't even playing so it would have been an easy mislynch and then we can shoot whomever we want at night with minimal info.

And why would I try to pocket you over -say- RC?? You and I both know you're not exactly a town leader, and you were not even present enough to affect anything when I was defending you!

popsofctown · Post Post #1894 (ISO) » Fri Jul 19, 2019 9:17 am

RC can be pocketed?

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #1895 (ISO) » Fri Jul 19, 2019 9:20 am

Cheeky had a similar fake read on me in Everything Is Completely Normal and was scum. Also none of what she has posted so far resembles her town game.

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #1896 (ISO) » Fri Jul 19, 2019 9:23 am

In post 1892, CheekyTeeky wrote:Creature do you have any reads yet?

This is also fake too. Guy just replaced in and stated he wasn’t even going to read. What reads would he have?

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #1897 (ISO) » Fri Jul 19, 2019 9:49 am

LUV stop tunnelling me, it's about as effective as vecna shading my every post.

Vecna · Post Post #1898 (ISO) » Fri Jul 19, 2019 9:51 am

In post 1879, AP wrote:
In post 1877, popsofctown wrote:I replaced in for scum!RC in Hope Plus One like 3 months ago
OK. So he changed that meta.

I've been witness to it as well (which was already discussed earlier)

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #1899 (ISO) » Fri Jul 19, 2019 9:52 am

In post 1893, AP wrote:No it's not. If I was scum and you were town I had no reason to fight against your lynch when almost everyone else was ok with it. You weren't even playing so it would have been an easy mislynch and then we can shoot whomever we want at night with minimal info.

And why would I try to pocket you over -say- RC?? You and I both know you're not exactly a town leader, and you were not even present enough to affect anything when I was defending you!

Wow. I think the implication is that you'd look better defending me rather than not if I flipped. But ok apparently I'm not worth pocketing.