In post 298, The Fonz wrote:Urs is particularly bad, though.In post 297, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:There hasn’t been any good ones so far.
And yes, that includes the one I casted for Baezu.
For funsies, anyone else want to tell me why?
You asked me for 4 reads.In post 290, cyrus62 wrote:you mean to tell me after 12 pages you don't see any one as scum or town yet? what have you been doing for 12 pages
Nice to feel remembered.In post 299, GreyICE wrote:going through momo's vote counts the following players have been voted:
The Fonz
cyrus62
Lil Uzi Vert
GreyICE
Baezu
Doctor Drew
Menalque
Jackal711
that leaves your scum list potential at
Karnage
mastina
elements
and i suppose if you must be complete gammaemerald
so i guess this raises the question, why aren't you voting karnage since he's guaranteed scum to you
unless this response of yours was total horseshit, of course
wait no ive got itIn post 298, The Fonz wrote:Urs is particularly bad, though.In post 297, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:There hasn’t been any good ones so far.
And yes, that includes the one I casted for Baezu.
For funsies, anyone else want to tell me why?
yes roster what are you doing this game . you wait till page 50 to give reads? the game may not make it to page 50 so your basically siting voteing randomIn post 301, rosterfoster wrote:You asked me for 4 reads.In post 290, cyrus62 wrote:you mean to tell me after 12 pages you don't see any one as scum or town yet? what have you been doing for 12 pages
Actually unsure if sarcastic (I'm not exactly noted as pro-lurker). The opposite was what I thought was true. I didn't see any other posts anywhere on site since his last post here. Since you have said this I have noted that Jackal did drop a couple of mishmash posts yesterday later than his last post here.In post 306, GreyICE wrote:wait no ive got itIn post 298, The Fonz wrote:Urs is particularly bad, though.In post 297, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:There hasn’t been any good ones so far.
And yes, that includes the one I casted for Baezu.
For funsies, anyone else want to tell me why?
jackal is posting a whole bunch in mish-mash games but not here
and that means hes lurking
and fonz thinks lurkers are usually town and shouldnt be voted
did i get it
WOW okay
In post 308, The Fonz wrote:Actually unsure if sarcastic (I'm not exactly noted as pro-lurker). The opposite was what I thought was true. I didn't see any other posts anywhere on site since his last post here. Since you have said this I have noted that Jackal did drop a couple of mishmash posts yesterday later than his last post here.In post 306, GreyICE wrote:wait no ive got itIn post 298, The Fonz wrote:Urs is particularly bad, though.In post 297, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:There hasn’t been any good ones so far.
And yes, that includes the one I casted for Baezu.
For funsies, anyone else want to tell me why?
jackal is posting a whole bunch in mish-mash games but not here
and that means hes lurking
and fonz thinks lurkers are usually town and shouldnt be voted
did i get it
Nonetheless, he has made three postsacross the sitein the whole of the last ten days. Jackal looks like effectively an empty slot to me. Voting a player who appears to be 'lurking' but is actually just not online is a pretty common way scum try to fake scumhunt - it's of very low utility to town, but safe because you can avoid getting caught in the middle of whatever the main argument of the day is. Then he responds to me criticising his vote by saying that all the existing wagons are bad, which reinforces the feeling of scum hiding by parking his vote on an inactive.
If LUV had tried to rally other people to a Jackal vote - even so much as being like "Hey guys, let's get this lurker" I'd be less suspicious.
I didn’t vote Jackal for his inactivity and assuming I did is pretty scummy.
Why? Esp considering mastina?In post 296, The Fonz wrote:Third party gambit would be dumb if she's out and out scum and I don't see the point wasting discussion on this.
The difference between you and I is that there is at leastIn post 292, mastina wrote:And of the mislynch bait, I townread Baezu in spite of the scummy content. I scumread Menalque, you, and Karnage and have a backup scumread in the form of cyrus.
Thus my readslist.
easy peasy day 2 policy lynchIn post 296, The Fonz wrote:Third party gambit would be dumb if she's out and out scum and I don't see the point wasting discussion on this.
i dont know that its a big deal right now. Outside of the obvious (gamma/elements/mastina) I don't have any strong reads yetIn post 313, cyrus62 wrote:no one sees rosters attempts at dogging questions, from me? on giving reads saids he has to wait till page 50?
Pahahahaha! This so bull.In post 312, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I didn’t vote Jackal for his inactivity and assuming I did is pretty scummy.
This is a really good point.In post 312, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:In post 308, The Fonz wrote:Actually unsure if sarcastic (I'm not exactly noted as pro-lurker). The opposite was what I thought was true. I didn't see any other posts anywhere on site since his last post here. Since you have said this I have noted that Jackal did drop a couple of mishmash posts yesterday later than his last post here.In post 306, GreyICE wrote:wait no ive got itIn post 298, The Fonz wrote:Urs is particularly bad, though.In post 297, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:There hasn’t been any good ones so far.
And yes, that includes the one I casted for Baezu.
For funsies, anyone else want to tell me why?
jackal is posting a whole bunch in mish-mash games but not here
and that means hes lurking
and fonz thinks lurkers are usually town and shouldnt be voted
did i get it
Nonetheless, he has made three postsacross the sitein the whole of the last ten days. Jackal looks like effectively an empty slot to me. Voting a player who appears to be 'lurking' but is actually just not online is a pretty common way scum try to fake scumhunt - it's of very low utility to town, but safe because you can avoid getting caught in the middle of whatever the main argument of the day is. Then he responds to me criticising his vote by saying that all the existing wagons are bad, which reinforces the feeling of scum hiding by parking his vote on an inactive.
If LUV had tried to rally other people to a Jackal vote - even so much as being like "Hey guys, let's get this lurker" I'd be less suspicious.I didn’t vote Jackal for his inactivity and assuming I did is pretty scummy.
Seeing the Baezu wagon go nowhere coupled with not understanding any of the reasoning people have been giving for their votes motivated me to reread the game. I sawJackal had voted for Cyrus and I didn’t like that he voted him for reasons he couldn’t discuss.I was hoping it would draw him out but I think these reactions are better.
I find it pretty laughable you think I have trouble faking scum hunting. There’s a lot of mislynch bait here as Mastina pointed out. There are also players like yourself and Grey that are easy to frustrate and distract the town. This is me disengaged and trying to see if throwing what little I have against the wall will work for me like it has been doing for practically everyone else.
No your vote is bull.In post 317, Gamma Emerald wrote:Pahahahaha! This so bull.In post 312, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I didn’t vote Jackal for his inactivity and assuming I did is pretty scummy.
Alright then, what's so scummy about Jackal's one post?
Cyrus, what about this post...In post 150, cyrus62 wrote:yes going have to switch roster for doctor i think my vote is well placedroster is now town to me
... moved roster to a town read for you?
In post 322, cyrus62 wrote:doctor drew told me to look in to roster so i did and i see roster doing nothing for town . hes doing nothing for town hes just acting like he is doing something for town.Spoiler:
