In post 498, Iconeum wrote: (which you'd be surprised at how often they actually start posting all of a sudden, so it's definitely not a waste of time).
Okay that’s fair.
In post 498, Iconeum wrote: (which you'd be surprised at how often they actually start posting all of a sudden, so it's definitely not a waste of time).
In post 501, Luca Blight wrote:Do either have you have any thoughts regarding Almost50?
I meant that I said. Scum!Icon needs a sheep more than a mislynch.In post 489, Luca Blight wrote:Remember all that stuff of mine you marked in red?In post 375, Datisi wrote:I'd argue scum!Icon needs a sheep more than he needs a mislynch candidate right now, but alas. I'll bite for now.
VOTE: Kop
Also I think this is L-2, but I've lost count, so, pls no lolhammers k thx.
It seems like you feel guilty for this vote and are making an excuse for yourself.
I thought we've established that I said "fake"In post 498, Iconeum wrote:My main issue reading those posts was 'devoid of life', while I thought the posts contained at least decent content and were definitely not empty.
When she reworded to 'reading fake'I thought OK, I could kinda see that.
Could you explain this comment, please.In post 520, Datisi wrote:I meant that I said. Scum!Icon needs a sheep more than a mislynch.In post 489, Luca Blight wrote:Remember all that stuff of mine you marked in red?In post 375, Datisi wrote:I'd argue scum!Icon needs a sheep more than he needs a mislynch candidate right now, but alas. I'll bite for now.
VOTE: Kop
Also I think this is L-2, but I've lost count, so, pls no lolhammers k thx.
It seems like you feel guilty for this vote and are making an excuse for yourself.
If you like you can have a dialog with me... Who's scum other than kop and why? Who's your top 2 town reads and why?In post 516, Datisi wrote:Ay yo Billy, how's that read on me looking rn?
I read this as you changing your explanation. It's not a misrep.In post 358, Datisi wrote:Huh. You didn't read all the game rules? And when going through my ISO later on, you didn't mention it?In post 355, Luca Blight wrote:@Datisi:It seemed like you were expecting scum to be discussing something more specific (I also wasn’t aware of the no day chat) so I was wondering what your thoughts were.
pedit: yes, I would say so. Also I realize now "devoid of life" might have been too harsh, but I'll stick with fake.