In post 899, Luca Blight wrote:If you notice, I’ve not had to pause to think amongst this barrage of questioning and accusation, and yet everything I’ve said has been fully supported and consistent with what I’ve said previously. How is this possible? Because I’m being honest with what I’m saying.
you are still scumclaiming
please continue to scumclaim more!
In post 129, Datisi wrote:Slight preference to vote for Tchill over Luca, but neither are pinging me as scum yet.
So I wasn’t pinging her as scum and she preferred to Lynch Tchill, yet now she is saying I’ve been giving her bad vibes and she was waiting to see if I would change....
As of the start of page 7, I'm feeling pretty good about Flippy, Klick and Billy. Iconeum seemed Townie based on his start,
but I may have to revisit that slot at some point
, Tchill's contribution at the end of page 6 seems decent.
Klick's 151 is either townie or confident scum work. I'm leaning towards the former atm.
In post 215, Luca Blight wrote:Tchili mid page 8 is either showing genuine Townie emotion or is a skilled scum player - it reminds me of my own frustration in past games.
Just skimmed the last couple of pages - gonna get myself more comfortable for some deeper reading. Right now I'm not really scumreading any of the active players, which is pretty rare for me.
The only one that falls slightly below the null line is probably Datisi based on her content, or lack thereof. Hopefully we get some replacements in soon.
Gonna read back again now.
In post 218, Luca Blight wrote:I also agree with the 'trying to look Town' bit regarding the topic of whether we should use the full day or cut it short.
Also, as a side point, I never understand why, as a Townie, you would tell scum what you're looking out for (in this case, specifically the interactions between possible scum partners). This isn't necessarily AI in of itself as I see this kind of thing all the time, but it's just something I feel is counter-productive.
In post 224, Luca Blight wrote:Looking over Datisi's ISO - it's full of game theory chat and passive questioning - this is where my slightly below null read originates from. The only real point of interest is 99 - Would scum do such a 'test'? Looking back at it, it felt a bit unnecessary of Datisi because Billy's answer to Klick's original question already provided the 'townslip'. I think I'm leaning towards this being an act from scum who are at a loss of what to do, so choose to do something that appears to be useful Town work, with the additional benefit of getting a Townie onside (which, if this scenario is accurate, would have been successful given Pilgrims TR of Datisi).
This is still very much a work in progress,
but my reads are something like this at the moment:
Tchill
Klick
Pilgrim, Icon, Flippy,
Datisi
Incidentally, Flippy's reaction to the same incident looked pretty genuine, which is why I've put him around the null level. I actually dislike such tests as it causes me to doubt myself; such reactions can look so effective, yet be so easily faked by a good player
Looking after my kid at the moment so hard for me to fully check back,
but I think I’ve covered most of the above already. I had a very slight townread on you based on the opening. By the time I made my catch-up post you hadn’t posted for like three days, nor had your ‘serious’ work at that point done much to give me a read on you either way, so I had you as null. Recently I’ve agreed with your points of view on Nippy (or rather you agreed with mine) and on Klick, plus I’ve seen some positive game advancing work from you, so I have you as a town-lean. I haven’t Iso’d you yet but that’s where i currently stand. The rest of your questions I believe I’ve covered already if you look back.
I've marked in red the parts that are pinging me. It simply seems as if he's trying to position himself in a "town-leadrer, voice of reason" position and to appear much more busy/credible than he is. Also note that these posts came after I nulled Luca.
pedit: as I said, I was willing to give him more time. I'm still not certain in this, but you've forced me to out my thoughts, so whatever.
pedit2: Billy and Emperor had single posts that pinged me more, and I was willing to jump on those to see what they mean. Luca has been slowly pinging me across the game.
It feels here like you’ve just zoomed in on the least important parts of my posts and disregarded all the necessary stuff. Do you have anything to say about the actual content of my work?
The 224 and 325 examples are particularly laughable for how you ignore all the actual information and highlight the only part that fits your narrative.
---
Luca Blight wrote:And as I’ve said a hundred times, the conviction came after i had digested what had happened, not before.
Both of these posts happened after I laid out my case but before you voted for me. So i was your strangest SR (I was at the bottom of your list), I made a case on you which you call out as "not adding up" and "laughable".
But you weren't convinced enough to vote me?
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
Datisi, I’ve already explained how I was multi-tasking and wanted to have a chance to properly look over what had happened. If I had just gone straight ahead and acted without thinking it over (which isn’t my style) then that would probably have come to be held against me as well.
If I were scum i literally wouldn’t even try to play Mafia while multi-tasking; i would just have waited until I had time to think about what I was doing, to avoid a situation such as this.
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you. Do you understand the rights I have just read to you? With these rights in mind, do you wish to speak to me?
In post 889, Alisae wrote:Billy who else is scum and why if you don't think its icon sell me on something
I started typing out a reads list, then j realized I'm still mostly confused. I see how Icon doesn't look good in that interaction, but I've seen Icon play that style before and he was town. I like to look at voting behavior more than anything else personally.
A50, why did Luca's answers seem sufficient to you? Was it just the tone?
In post 889, Alisae wrote:Billy who else is scum and why if you don't think its icon sell me on something
I started typing out a reads list, then j realized I'm still mostly confused. I see how Icon doesn't look good in that interaction, but I've seen Icon play that style before and he was town. I like to look at voting behavior more than anything else personally.
A50, why did Luca's answers seem sufficient to you? Was it just the tone?
In post 889, Alisae wrote:Billy who else is scum and why if you don't think its icon sell me on something
I started typing out a reads list, then j realized I'm still mostly confused. I see how Icon doesn't look good in that interaction, but I've seen Icon play that style before and he was town. I like to look at voting behavior more than anything else personally.
A50, why did Luca's answers seem sufficient to you? Was it just the tone?
okay lets talk voting behavoir
who sticks out?
Unfortunately my work calendar just exploded, so before I do vote analysis, I need to be done at work and have the kids asleep. Probably 12 hours.
In post 914, Billy Pilgrim wrote:Also, I love that Ali just called Miranda rights Amanda rights. I'm also amused that she basically put Luca under arrest. Is that a citizen's arrest?
In post 889, Alisae wrote:Billy who else is scum and why if you don't think its icon sell me on something
I started typing out a reads list, then j realized I'm still mostly confused. I see how Icon doesn't look good in that interaction, but I've seen Icon play that style before and he was town. I like to look at voting behavior more than anything else personally.
A50, why did Luca's answers seem sufficient to you? Was it just the tone?
okay lets talk voting behavoir
who sticks out?
Unfortunately my work calendar just exploded, so before I do vote analysis, I need to be done at work and have the kids asleep. Probably 12 hours.
I really don’t get what difference it makes exactly when I made the vote; I have made my position on Datisi clear throughout. Delaying my vote wouldn’t have made a difference in terms of accountability.
I’ve just tried to be as transparently clear as I can possibly be here. I hate having to defend myself as i know self-defence can only go so far, but I feel like I’ve given a pretty valid explanation for how my Datisi read progressed.
In post 889, Alisae wrote:Billy who else is scum and why if you don't think its icon sell me on something
I started typing out a reads list, then j realized I'm still mostly confused. I see how Icon doesn't look good in that interaction, but I've seen Icon play that style before and he was town. I like to look at voting behavior more than anything else personally.
A50, why did Luca's answers seem sufficient to you? Was it just the tone?
okay lets talk voting behavoir
who sticks out?
Unfortunately my work calendar just exploded, so before I do vote analysis, I need to be done at work and have the kids asleep. Probably 12 hours.
You want to save your analysis until you have time to do it properly, just like I did, so surely you can relate to my situation after all.
In post 889, Alisae wrote:Billy who else is scum and why if you don't think its icon sell me on something
I started typing out a reads list, then j realized I'm still mostly confused. I see how Icon doesn't look good in that interaction, but I've seen Icon play that style before and he was town. I like to look at voting behavior more than anything else personally.
A50, why did Luca's answers seem sufficient to you? Was it just the tone?
okay lets talk voting behavoir
who sticks out?
Unfortunately my work calendar just exploded, so before I do vote analysis, I need to be done at work and have the kids asleep. Probably 12 hours.
You want to save your analysis until you have time to do it properly, just like I did, so surely you can relate to my situation after all.
Okay but thats literally different then typing VOTE: datisiVOTE:
(with correct coding ofc)
thats playing the game and posting content and analysis
if you see Datisi's Kop vote and at a first glance go "this vote is really scummy"
All you need to do on your phone is to click the button that allows you to quote the post
AND THEN VOTE IT
AND THATS IT
