Newbie 1951 (Day 4)

[teacher]

@Emps - reasons I TRed Sushi. I even put a hyphen between spam and sushi in my readslist in 458 to let them know I had seen the cross crumbing (I caught NMSAs, but didnt put it as claiming w/ Fark til Fark claimed.

[emps]

d1 vca

hmmmmmmmmm

[NotMySpamAccount]

I like the addition of masons, RC did a good job.

I've never played in a game with masons, will be interesting to see how it goes.

Also, hi, everyone!

I saw this as a claim to being a mason - it implies knowledge that they are present. @Emps, this was one of the reasons, I saw this as a crumb of being masons with Spam -- the quote.

my 30 was just me hammering in the mason crumb to the point where it was undeniable in case fark ended up really needing it. he would have too, without creeper and skitter

[emps]

oh that makes sense

whats ur read on sushi w/o that?

[NotMySpamAccount]

@Emps - reasons I TRed Sushi. I even put a hyphen between spam and sushi in my readslist in 458 to let them know I had seen the cross crumbing (I caught NMSAs, but didnt put it as claiming w/ Fark til Fark claimed.

huh I didn't eeven notice

[teacher]

N

ow i look like a good girl from an anime i like.

A

lso hello to all the newly arrived.

M

y readings so far:

S

elynee - town 70% very proactive
Menalque - town 50% mafia 50% trollish
teacher - mafia 60% too serious to be town PR

notmyspam - town 70% plays like expert town

sushi - town 50% mafia 50% trollish
emps - town 65% aggressive play

O

ther two have yet to speak, 80% at least one mafia hiding in there

UNVOTE:

VOTE: teacher

[emps]

how in the what duck is that a mason breadcrumb

[NotMySpamAccount]

N

ow i look like a good girl from an anime i like.

A

lso hello to all the newly arrived.

M

y readings so far:

S

elynee - town 70% very proactive
Menalque - town 50% mafia 50% trollish
teacher - mafia 60% too serious to be town PR

notmyspam - town 70% plays like expert town

sushi - town 50% mafia 50% trollish
emps - town 65% aggressive play

O

ther two have yet to speak, 80% at least one mafia hiding in there

UNVOTE:

VOTE: teacher

nope

[emps]

yeah thats about what i thought no way thats a mason breadcrumb lol

[teacher]

@Emps - reasons I TRed Sushi. I even put a hyphen between spam and sushi in my readslist in 458 to let them know I had seen the cross crumbing (I caught NMSAs, but didnt put it as claiming w/ Fark til Fark claimed.

huh I didn't eeven notice

yea, I tried to make it subtle, but obvious, by making sure to include two other players on the same row but without a hyphen for you to know the hyphen was important.

@Emps - weak TL. Those posts were definitely her mind, but without a mason crumb from two sides its nowhere near as high.

[Farkran]

do try to be protown with your invincibility though, Fark.

I genuinely tried though. My game experience is A LOT different than yours. Fakehammering was considered a dirty play, days lasted 48 hours (hence some of my posts containing SRs against people not writing much), WAY more PRs in our setups, etc.

We valued VCA and association analysis more than everything, progression is worth nothing on d1

lol you come from a very different place.

I mean seriously. However, look at the result - in the end, we gamesolved based on VCA. True that it's HEAVILY creeper's fault and our CC counts as a flip, so you could say this is already d2, but despite my crappy progression on pretty much everyone except teacher (who turned out to be town, lol, sorry mate), i arrived to the conclusion that Menalque was likely scum through my methods. NMSA didn't instruct me on WHY he thought menalque-creeper was gamesolve (but he did mention it earlier in this thread), and i was still advocating creeper at the time.

[teacher]

Eh, it was the best I saw -- starting caps not necesarily in order. I think you did better than NMSA on hiding the crumb really well, but I can understand why. I look forward to you outing it after others try.

[NotMySpamAccount]

nah we gamesolved on creeper's claim and good reads.

[NotMySpamAccount]

Eh, it was the best I saw -- starting caps not necesarily in order. I think you did better than NMSA on hiding the crumb really well, but I can understand why. I look forward to you outing it after others try.

yeah I was barely hiding mine

[Farkran]

Also, credit for the crumbs goes to NMSA. We stopped using crumbs back there because there has been a game where EVERYONE crumbed the shit out of themselves and then any day code was banned.

[emps]

my poe rn is mena, sushi, sely ill look over interactions and find which one is the partner

[NotMySpamAccount]

Also, credit for the crumbs goes to NMSA. We stopped using crumbs back there because there has been a game where EVERYONE crumbed the shit out of themselves and then any day code was banned.

ok that's hilarious. we have a rule here against code or tiny text, but crumbing is allowed

[emps]

Also, credit for the crumbs goes to NMSA. We stopped using crumbs back there because there has been a game where EVERYONE crumbed the shit out of themselves and then any day code was banned.

Oh that was encryption

some people started encrypting their roleclaims for massclaims so that scum had to choose to claim PR or not d1

[teacher]

pretty much everyone except teacher (who turned out to be town, lol, sorry mate

no worries - so did you I did basically have you down to PR or scum at that point, and Im comfortable with how I played it too, because I thought I was bleeding town all over the place -- notice how you were the only one voting me -- so I just assumed scum with someone that knows me and wanted me gone.

Im happy I SRed Menalque until my SR of you interfered with that. 65 actually was the first to make me think that, in addition to the unjustified TR of you. It felt like a goad to put me on tilt a bit.

[NotMySpamAccount]

Also, credit for the crumbs goes to NMSA. We stopped using crumbs back there because there has been a game where EVERYONE crumbed the shit out of themselves and then any day code was banned.

ok that's hilarious. we have a rule here against code or tiny text, but crumbing is allowed

Actually, I want to read that. DO you have a link?

[Farkran]

nah we gamesolved on creeper's claim and good reads.

Well, without creeper's claim the game would have laste what, like 1 more day? Once he flipped scum, there's no way menalque wasn't with him. And i thought that creeper was town. Not to praise myself over you guys, seriously - i think i played pretty bad, but given this is my first game on site i believe i could have done way worse.

[teacher]

Proper Mason play is to convoluted crumb and provide the key.

I have come around to the opinion that it is a good idea to crumb generally, to trump scum counterclaims in a gamestate where that makes sense. Plus as PR I generally scum it up a bit.

PEdit: I think you played well, and also bled through a bit (enough that Skitter sided, and I was tight), but I also think you guaranteed your NK as scum would know you were indeed PR -- that was the logical conclusion of PR spec, too. I think better to use your systems, but also follow common practice a bit more.

[emps]

at least i had one correct scumread

aka creeper

who everyone else also scumread

now praise me for being so godly at the game

[emps]

smh i just realized creeper is at l-1 teacher you didnt even hammer him

[emps]

we got anything more to discuss or do you guys mind if i just hammer