This is odd.
Skellen has never posted anything in this board and here you are coming in and voting Skellen without saying anything about him. Why Skellen?
This is odd.
In post 25, Kraeg wrote:This is odd.
Skellen has never posted anything in this board and here you are coming in and voting Skellen without saying anything about him. Why Skellen?
Who's the scummiest so far thoughIn post 31, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I'll just UNVOTE: for now. Would like to see more of what people has to say before i start placing votes. That's more my style anyway.
Is it your position that votes during RVS should be completely random? I feel like him giving a reason for the vote was better than switching it with no discussion.In post 28, profii wrote:Like I know you were playing with Garmr
But you said in post 15 "you will have to be lynchedfor that"
That infers a reason for the vote
Might be a silly fun reason but it wasnt random
Maybe for like the first 3 votes where literally nothing has happenedIn post 35, Billy Pilgrim wrote:Is it your position that votes during RVS should be completely random? I feel like him giving a reason for the vote was better than switching it with no discussion.In post 28, profii wrote:Like I know you were playing with Garmr
But you said in post 15 "you will have to be lynchedfor that"
That infers a reason for the vote
Might be a silly fun reason but it wasnt random
If so:
1)how would we ever move out of RVS short of setting a deadline; and
2) what information would you hope to glean from truly random votes?
Not a fan of Norweigenboy's defensive tone, and definitely not a fan that he unvoted when getting pressure for voting.
I don't see what's so odd about it? I mean flippy gave you already kind of the obvious answer (mainly his 2.). The only thing he could have commented on was the beginning of the Garmr/Norwegianboy interaction. I understand you are scumreading the latter also for his opening, so if voting elsewhere is odd wouldn't it be more interesting to get to know why flippy decided to not comment/vote there?
I get your stance on this, I struggle with some things on this site too that just seem to be the general consensus here. Unfortunately you have to roll with it.In post 27, NorwegianboyEE wrote:RVS votes don't matter for jack ****. That's what i believe, i'm just trying to follow the culture around these parts since some of the people here actually seem to believe that RVS votes matter. Yet now Profii is claiming my vote puts us out of RVS? Scummy.
Not a fan of this. I dislike how you are obviously not feeling good about Norwegianboy yet you are hesitant to increase the pressure on him with not voting him?In post 35, Billy Pilgrim wrote: Not a fan of Norweigenboy's defensive tone, and definitely not a fan that he unvoted when getting pressure for voting.
I thought that Profii might be attempting to provoke me so he can get a good read on my alignment. Which is a townie thing to do, so that's why i didn't blame him. Of course there's also the possibility he's mafia attempting to get a early outing of a townie. But i think he's trustworthy since he even confirmed his intent in this post:In post 40, Skellen wrote: Tbh I am not really getting your point about profii why thinking your vote moved us out of RVS is scummy. I get your tonal read in #21, but if you dislike RVS so much, why have you decided to roll with it instead of going for profii who gave you actually scummy vibes?
In post 38, profii wrote:thats the reason i just probed at Norge's vote just to see if he reacted in any major way but i dont think he did
What does that bit mean? Why would mafia out a towns person? They know who town are and revealing townsfolk to the rest of the townsfolk would put them at a disadvantage.In post 42, NorwegianboyEE wrote:there's also the possibility he's mafia attempting to get a early outing of a townie
Fair enough. I wait a bit before casting a vote. I get why you read this as off, but it's where I'm at now with how I want to play D1.In post 41, Skellen wrote:Not a fan of this. I dislike how you are obviously not feeling good about Norwegianboy yet you are hesitant to increase the pressure on him with not voting him?In post 35, Billy Pilgrim wrote: Not a fan of Norweigenboy's defensive tone, and definitely not a fan that he unvoted when getting pressure for voting.
VOTE: Billy
Also, the defensive tone is a weak tell. The unvote's a bit stronger, but his sorting of profii felt genuine. There was that weird shading in the middle of 42, but he came around with decent reason at the end with reading the intention.In post 41, Skellen wrote:Not a fan of this. I dislike how you are obviously not feeling good about Norwegianboy yet you are hesitant to increase the pressure on him with not voting him?In post 35, Billy Pilgrim wrote: Not a fan of Norweigenboy's defensive tone, and definitely not a fan that he unvoted when getting pressure for voting.
VOTE: Billy