Mohab500 wrote:VOTE: Kraeg for now.
So he's getting scumread by two people because he came in trying to sort? I don't know that I agree with Kraeg's reasoning, but points for trying.In post 49, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I agree fellow animated avatar. He gave me the same icky feeling.
In post 50, Billy Pilgrim wrote:Mohab500 wrote:VOTE: Kraeg for now.So he's getting scumread by two people because he came in trying to sort? I don't know that I agree with Kraeg's reasoning, but points for trying.In post 49, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I agree fellow animated avatar. He gave me the same icky feeling.
Went to check if you are new after this post your not. Noticed you gave a blank vote before as well. That being said I don't know if scum would post something that would make them look like a newer player.In post 25, Kraeg wrote:This is odd.
Skellen has never posted anything in this board and here you are coming in and voting Skellen without saying anything about him. Why Skellen?
Talking to kraeg I could tell it was Rvs.In post 56, Emperor flippyNips wrote:If so Not really. I was just really tired & pretty high & still at work so a naked RVS vote was alll I could muster up
I just iso'd you to check and make sure I didn't mess up, this is the first time you were saying you were scum reading him right, because I didn't see it before this post? And if you're scumreading him over his tone, is there a reason your vote is still on skellen?In post 53, Emperor flippyNips wrote:In post 50, Billy Pilgrim wrote:Mohab500 wrote:VOTE: Kraeg for now.So he's getting scumread by two people because he came in trying to sort? I don't know that I agree with Kraeg's reasoning, but points for trying.In post 49, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I agree fellow animated avatar. He gave me the same icky feeling.
3 pilgrim
Are you trying to pull some sort of slayers gambit? You look surface level scummy but when I think of a reason why scum would be saying what you say I can't find one. The logic is bad.In post 63, Kraeg wrote:Game is already out of RVS after a few posts 'cause of Norwegian.
Also, I'm getting a bad feeling about Billy's V/LA. I've been a player of this game for like years already and I've seen mafia abuse the V/LA as an excuse to avoid everyone. I'm not a big fan of people going on V/LAs.
I'm on vacation at the beach. I still drop in and you shade me for going V/LA? I'm posting enough that I'm not even in prod range. Seriously, what's your deal? You came in hyper aggro and site meta isn't really to take issue with V/LA. Also, it's a two week day 1 and I'm out for like 4 days and I'll be back for the last 10. As off putting as this play is, I can't see scum motivation for it. It's weird, definitely, but I don't think it's scum.In post 63, Kraeg wrote:Game is already out of RVS after a few posts 'cause of Norwegian.
Also, I'm getting a bad feeling about Billy's V/LA. I've been a player of this game for like years already and I've seen mafia abuse the V/LA as an excuse to avoid everyone. I'm not a big fan of people going on V/LAs.
Eh, not really.In post 71, Billy Pilgrim wrote:And does that change your read of his generally aggro behavior on coming into the forum?
In post 68, Garmr wrote:Are you trying to pull some sort of slayers gambit? You look surface level scummy but when I think of a reason why scum would be saying what you say I can't find one. The logic is bad.In post 63, Kraeg wrote:Game is already out of RVS after a few posts 'cause of Norwegian.
Also, I'm getting a bad feeling about Billy's V/LA. I've been a player of this game for like years already and I've seen mafia abuse the V/LA as an excuse to avoid everyone. I'm not a big fan of people going on V/LAs.
