Farren’s been incredibly Town over the last 72 hours or so, and if you haven’t seen that I think it’s because you haven’t been looking for it.In post 470, skitter30 wrote:Do tellIn post 465, Micc wrote:Skitter continuing to scumread Farren is scummy to me.
How are u reading norwegian?
Yeah he pointed out i may be tunneled, which is fair, i think, i want to reconsider a bitIn post 475, Micc wrote:Farren’s been incredibly Town over the last 72 hours or so, and if you haven’t seen that I think it’s because you haven’t been looking for it.In post 470, skitter30 wrote:Do tellIn post 465, Micc wrote:Skitter continuing to scumread Farren is scummy to me.
How are u reading norwegian?
I don’t know how Norwegian got out of my lynch pool originally but I would consider him back in now. Not that I think he’s particularly scummy, but he’s not someone I’d go out of my way to defend/work with.
If she thinks scum is pushing Chemist, that seems a totally logical reason to think Chemist is less likely to be scum to me.In post 455, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Such a bad argument. Your only defense of Chemist is that people are voting him because he seems suspicious... That’s why you think he’s town? Seriously?In post 448, skitter30 wrote: basically i still don't like his rvs post but like he hasn't done much else ai and i think people are scummier and being suspicious of him became like a ~popular~ opinion so i'm wondering if scum were piling on when it was popular
Just felt like a really weird comment. I was unsure if understood the context of my posting and sought to clarify.In post 483, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Oh, sorry for commenting on what you say. Rude of me.
Meta's a tool, just like any other. It can be used, misused, and abused.In post 464, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I wouldn't trust the meta. Might just be scumplayers doing their tricks to fool us into a hard townread.
Is there a better way of finding game lists and alignment than looking at a player's topics posted in? Takes a lot of digging to find scumgames that way amongst prolific players.
I’m sorry that you were offended by my attempt to clarify that I was talking to skitter and got you. It matters to me because I want my posts to be understood in the context I meant then and not some other way.In post 487, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I doubt either Oobsy or Leucosticte is mafia.
@Micc You said "I'm not talking to you" which made me feel very offended. This is a mafia game, why should it matter who's talking or not? Also i'm disappointed that you're planning to stick together with your veteran buddies rather than looking at who is logically townie or scummy out of everyone.
In post 479, NorwegianboyEE wrote:@Skitter30
If you think my rationale is "why not" then you're incredibly dishonest Skitter30.
I'm sticking with my Chemist vote anyways, so if you're not worried about his flip i'd advice you to do the same. If he's town the suspicion will be directed towards me in any case.
(underlining added)In post 471, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I read someone say on a different mafia thread (Or maybe it was this one, i can't remember) that it's been trendy lately for the mafia team to pile up their votes on one user because "There's no way mafia would do that!!"In post 468, skitter30 wrote:The whole scumteam piles on you because ...
So why not?
Some players keep a list of games in their wiki. Only a handful are committed to keeping it up to date. Besides that you’re mostly limited to viewing their past threads, using search or asking them.In post 490, Farren wrote:Is there a better way of finding game lists and alignment than looking at a player's topics posted in? Takes a lot of digging to find scumgames that way amongst prolific players.
I thought you knew? I was responding to this:In post 491, Micc wrote:I’m sorry that you were offended by my attempt to clarify that I was talking to skitter and got you. It matters to me because I want my posts to be understood in the context I meant then and not some other way.In post 487, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I doubt either Oobsy or Leucosticte is mafia.
@Micc You said "I'm not talking to you" which made me feel very offended. This is a mafia game, why should it matter who's talking or not? Also i'm disappointed that you're planning to stick together with your veteran buddies rather than looking at who is logically townie or scummy out of everyone.
Presenting me as allying with veteran buddies irrespective of making reads in the thread is a pretty big misrepresentation of where I’m at.
Finally, please answer what your intent was when you made post 481 without dodging this time.
Heh. Asking may be good for post-game, but I wouldn't trust it during the game.In post 493, Micc wrote:Some players keep a list of games in their wiki. Only a handful are committed to keeping it up to date. Besides that you’re mostly limited to viewing their past threads, using search or asking them.
Ebwop
i asked you what scum!me and scum!chemist were doing, both voting you?In post 479, NorwegianboyEE wrote:@Skitter30
If you think my rationale is "why not" then you're incredibly dishonest Skitter30.
I'm sticking with my Chemist vote anyways, so if you're not worried about his flip i'd advice you to do the same. If he's town the suspicion will be directed towards me in any case.
i don't townread u tho :/In post 485, Micc wrote:Skitter, I think what I’m saying is that if you’re Town then you Farren and I are a strong voting block that should be looking to consolidate instead of fighting each other. Note that I’m not entirely convinced you’re Town, but I’m happier pretending you are for at least a day than anyone else in the playerlist. As I see it Leucosticte, Norwegian and oobsy are the valid wagons and we should be having a discussion about which is best. I think that probably involves me taking a good look at Norwegian and you taking a good look at Leucosticte.