I think it doesn't make sense in a 9 player game period given how it may never even be used. N3? That's weird.In post 2271, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I think Gobble’s role doesn’t make any sense with mailman or his modifier.
Gobble did review the game and provided us with his "mechanics" of sort.In post 2277, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:And it’s not just the claim. Gobble has done zero scum hunting. His entire ISO is just mechanics and style.
To believe me and Uzi are a scumteam, you would have to believe that Billy was bussing me on D1 following Ali's replace in. His vote was third on my wagon, and was effectively an L-1 vote given Datisi, who was not on my wagon, was definitely going to vote me at that time as we were at loggerheads. Billy completely sided with Alisae against me when there would have been no need to given the obvious flaws in his arguments, and entirely dismissed my explanation for my Datisi vote, which was the main reason I was being suspected D1. Bearing in mind Billy's lack of experience and the lack of Mafia day chat, it should reason enough to believe Uzi and I aren't the scum team.In post 2262, Klick wrote: I'm falling on LUV/Luca as a team and I think it makes a fair amount of sense. Luca's read on LUV has flip-flopped enough that I'm not sold on it being coherent.
What review? The one in which he broke down our activity?In post 2278, Tchill13 wrote:If scum you just claim n2 bodyguard and keep icon alive.
I just don't understand why scum claim that.
I don't think you're playing at all honestly, and your slot is not one I want if there is a lylo. Hell even gobble has more to play off than you do now.
Yes you could be doing this as town (I'll be incredibly disappointed) but just because that's a possibility doesn't mean it's true. You could easily do this as scum calso.
I used that statement because the crux of your argument is that I’m lurking. Active lurking is actually more scummy than just not being here. Fluffy posts and appearing like one is helping while being active tends to get more eyes raised than someone who constantly is getting prodded.In post 2280, Tchill13 wrote:I've never accused you of active lurking because you're lacking the active part.
Why would you use a statement like that to defend yourself? I can engage with an active lurker by mentioning them. I can't engage with you unless I'm lucky.
Dude I’m asking you why you think I’m not playing lolIn post 2285, Tchill13 wrote:Yes he did an activity breakdown.
Why aren't you playing? Why are. You asking me that?
It’s human nature to want to be right. After all, if you aren’t right, it follows that you are wrong. Right? Who wants to be wrong? No one. Yet, the need to be right can get you into a lot of tight spots. And it’s an approach that won’t help you change anything. Instead, it keeps you stuck. And that’s where you’re with me right now.In post 2281, Tchill13 wrote:More focused on "wanting to be right as opposed to if you'd play like this as scum"
What does this mean exactly?
Being right is my top priority.
Are you suggesting that I was willing to vote Icon? Because this was never the case.In post 2175, Klick wrote: Why would I push for a massclaim in the first place here? Icon could have just been lynched. Me, Luca, Tchill, A50. The votes were there at one point.
You mean that game where you incorrectly determined I was scum based on that chart, right? That game? You had like a 50% success average which is like actually terrible to base anything on.In post 2182, gobbledygook wrote:Iconeum can attest to its success in our recent game together.
You decide to vote when you have caught up to about 25% of the game and flow charts that can be replaced by flipping a coin for equal success? Flow charts that are skewed because activity =/= allignment. You clear 2 slots because they are active, and completely ignore the fact they had 'positive' lines because they were in a huge discussion (i'm not pushing either of Klick or Tchill with this, just questioning the reads from gobble).In post 2182, gobbledygook wrote:For these reasons, I believe this should be our kill order {LUV, Datisi, Luca Blight, Klick, Tchill13} with the scum team more than likely being LUV/Datisi.VOTE: LUV
Because some players just don't like having to read a crap ton of new pages as either allignment? Are you actually saying only scum cannot enjoy the game?In post 2194, gobbledygook wrote:Because they aren’t enjoying the game. Why aren’t they enjoying the game? Because they are possibly scum.
catching up will decide afterwardsIn post 2296, Tchill13 wrote:Icon please vote LUV. For the luv of all that is good... Hehe.
No seriously. We need a flip. Luv is a better lynch than datisi. Idc what gobble's reasons for voting luv is.
oh the old 'if everyone says something it must be true'. Like when everyone was saying the earth was flat, yeah?In post 2198, Tchill13 wrote:I want datisi lynched first because the majority of players are calling her scum and the content she's provided leads me to believe she could actually be scum.
mmhmmIn post 2206, gobbledygook wrote:Probably path of least resistance for some he already sees as having high scum equity, but I’ll let him answer
this dude… Actually I think he believes he is solving the game. He's probably not scum I just really dislike the way he plays the game, similar to what Tchill probably thinks of me.In post 2208, gobbledygook wrote:Page 50ish
Ehh wat?In post 2210, Tchill13 wrote:When a majority calls someone town or scum it's usually true isn't it? I thought that was a common thing on site.In post 2205, Datisi wrote:Btw what's up with this?In post 2198, Tchill13 wrote:I want datisi lynched firstbecause the majority of players are calling her scumand the content she's provided leads me to believe she could actually be scum.
Oh this is stronk read! Let's lynch in a pool that contains BOTH claimed PR's!In post 2246, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I’m fine lynching in Datisi, Gobble, and Iconeum today. I need to reread this Day 2 to really solidify or disconfirm my dislike of tchill’s play today.