Large Normal 223 | New Beginnings | GAME OVER

[Rick Dalton]

@Elements - I also fake claimed Day 3 IC, and if I didn’t get revealed as town, then to lynch me, and it drove scum wild in their PT, to the point Night 2 I had to make sure, so I spent hours doing analysis and i used my 1-shot Vigilante to hit the mafia doctor, and thus got the “scum should always kill Boon.” line in my signature.

So the Day 3 ic is kind of a recurring joke, which is actually more of a crumb for vigilante than IC.

[Carcalilly]

Do you always brag about your carried games, FL?

[Carcalilly]

Juuuuust wanna make sure it's not AI for you before I go and make accusations.

[AaronFrost]

I'll admit once again that I mostly skimmed through the thread to get caught up quickly so my reads were mostly gut based.

I'm gonna ISO players I find scummy eventually.

[Rick Dalton]

This is the most serious you've been all game, most of your posts we're either silly or some form of meta

pedit: speaking of meta.......

So?

I go back and forth always.

It’s Day 1.

Also, Elements got steam because TownRick pushed him.

That’s why gamma’s application is weak. I have had a strong presence in this game, even prior to this.

[Rick Dalton]

Do you always brag about your carried games, FL?

Anyone else wanna answer this for me?

[EeveeLution Army]

I can brag too. It doesnt exactly show your alignment.

[Carcalilly]

So you're that dependant on confirmed information?

[Rick Dalton]

Juuuuust wanna make sure it's not AI for you before I go and make accusations.

I’m the most narcissistic player on site, however, I’m narcissistic for everyone I analyze and think everyone should just be proud and confident with their ability and really push their passions. That’s how I am in real life, but people see my genuineness, and I’m overly optimistic, and I’m a derpfuck as well, so it’s a nice blend.

The derpfuck lets me be likable, and the playful arrogance lets people sass me in fun ways.

[EeveeLution Army]

Ive actually won as scum with never doing any night actions and got town to self-destruct before but that was a long time ago.

[Carcalilly]

I can brag too. It doesnt exactly show your alignment.

But when you do it in a way that attempts to justify all your behavior........

[Elements]

@Elements - I also fake claimed Day 3 IC, and if I didn’t get revealed as town, then to lynch me, and it drove scum wild in their PT, to the point Night 2 I had to make sure, so I spent hours doing analysis and i used my 1-shot Vigilante to hit the mafia doctor, and thus got the “scum should always kill Boon.” line in my signature.

So the Day 3 ic is kind of a recurring joke, which is actually more of a crumb for vigilante than IC.

Sounds like it was a fun game

[Rick Dalton]

So you're that dependant on confirmed information?

Me? I don’t care at all about stuff like that.

I just know I’d be able to pull of crazy out there scum plays like butter, so not gonna pretend other scum players can’t.

I’m not a mechanical player, I’m a social player. I like to focus on dayplay.

[EeveeLution Army]

I guess it can make sense if you're trying to set an established meta for yourself.

[EeveeLution Army]

But like its a bit of a stretch

[Rick Dalton]

I can brag too. It doesnt exactly show your alignment.

No, but the examples shown portray the type of player/person I am, which people could then use to help them read me correctly.

I’ll give you the fishing pole, and all the tools, but I’m too impatient to teach you how to fish.

[Carcalilly]

"Hey you know this thing you called me out on? I did it in this game that I was town and look, I won."

It might just be me being a stickler for keeping things in-game because I believe all interactions have an interior purpose. I have never played two games that were alike so I assume people haven't either.

[EeveeLution Army]

Some games are similar but i think thats more because of how much i play

[Carcalilly]

So you're that dependant on confirmed information?

Me? I don’t care at all about stuff like that.

I just know I’d be able to pull of crazy out there scum plays like butter, so not gonna pretend other scum players can’t.

I’m not a mechanical player, I’m a social player. I like to focus on dayplay.

Then why are you using the "day 1" excuse? It implies that you need more information post-night-action to take the game seriously.

[EeveeLution Army]

The problem is you can use that fact as scum to. Its why i dont always trust playermeta

[Gamma Emerald]

I got pissed off and didn’t feel like reading.

Then I read and Gamma’s just scum.

I’m an investigative. Gtfo

First off no way in hell you think an investigative CCs masons in a game this size. Second I'd like to see you justify a scumread on me in any other way.

[Rick Dalton]

I guess it can make sense if you're trying to set an established meta for yourself.

I don’t need to establish a meta for myself.

I feel like I’m one of the players who’s played in the most games around these parts here, so my meta speaks for itself.

I’m also great at manipulating meta, though, so that’s another reason why gamma’s application is weak.

My scum games don’t look the same. My town games don’t look the same.

I do things as scum because i do them as town, and I constantly am adapting my scum game.

Also, Gamma always incorrectly reads me early game so he should know by this point that’s a weak reasoning.

Town/town we usually eventually end up on the same path, but generally like Day 3.

[Rick Dalton]

I got pissed off and didn’t feel like reading.

Then I read and Gamma’s just scum.

I’m an investigative. Gtfo

First off no way in hell you think an investigative CCs masons in a game this size. Second I'd like to see you justify a scumread on me in any other way.

It wasn’t a CC.

This is a misrep.

[Gamma Emerald]

It’s just day 1 when I’m in multiple games

This feels exceptionally questionable
Is this a thing that has recently become a problem for you?

[Rick Dalton]

I did.

Your application of that playstyle of mine was straight up incorrect.

Especially because I had a presence in this game alreadyand was actively giving thoughts.

You made a case that you could just state in a simple discussion thread when it didn’t even apply here