Magical Girls UPick - Heart of Shadow (Game Over)

Lady Eventide · Post Post #1250 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:02 am

In post 1246, popsofctown wrote:
In post 1241, gameplay506 wrote: As for Chaos Wind he is meh. Least content in the game rn so I don't really want a to lynch that.
Nah, that's a reason to lynch that.

When you have a low slot with very little content and a very high percentage scummy, that's always a great lynch.

Not producing content is, itself, scum indicative, and even when it's town it's less likely that it was ever going to generate enough content to get out of your mislynch pool (with some exceptions like when a well-known player has a v/la.)

^ this, inactive lynches are good policy; people who do not contribute to solving are dead weight and ought to be lynched even if they end up being town.

gameplay506 · Post Post #1251 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:03 am

In post 1246, popsofctown wrote:When you have a low slot with very little content and a very high percentage scummy, that's always a great lynch.

I don't see high percentage scummy.

Pedit: oh lol, that guy, yea.
Pretty sure he isn't going to catch up.

Tana and Ephraim · Post Post #1252 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:03 am

Okay Tana. I think you're really sweet and you've been a great hydra partner.

Do you townread me now?

popsofctown · Post Post #1253 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:04 am

In post 1251, gameplay506 wrote:
In post 1246, popsofctown wrote:When you have a low slot with very little content and a very high percentage scummy, that's always a great lynch.
I don't see high percentage scummy.

Pedit: oh lol, that guy, yea.
Pretty sure he isn't going to catch up.

CW basically only has 2 posts.

RC sees both as scummy, I only saw 1 as scummy.

Huge swing between 50% and 100%.

Tana and Ephraim · Post Post #1254 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:08 am

In post 943, popsofctown wrote:Sakura Hana did Sakura Hana obvtowning that I heard so many rumors about in the first few pages of the game

Btw, unrelated and late but, it's the first time im hearing that im famous for obtowning, that's... really good to know actually.
-Tana

Tana and Ephraim · Post Post #1255 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:10 am

In post 1252, Tana and Ephraim wrote:Okay Tana. I think you're really sweet and you've been a great hydra partner.

Do you townread me now?

RC please, you're conf town this game
-Tana

Lady Eventide · Post Post #1256 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:17 am

Hey Pops, what are your current reads of Dannfor and RCE?

gameplay506 · Post Post #1257 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:18 am

In post 1253, popsofctown wrote:
In post 1251, gameplay506 wrote:
In post 1246, popsofctown wrote:When you have a low slot with very little content and a very high percentage scummy, that's always a great lynch.
I don't see high percentage scummy.

Pedit: oh lol, that guy, yea.
Pretty sure he isn't going to catch up.
CW basically only has 2 posts.

RC sees both as scummy, I only saw 1 as scummy.

Huge swing between 50% and 100%.

I see, I see
And if that's the case with you guys, I understand

Thing is I don't see their posts as scummy and if they keep on doing nothing and get lynched it won't be very informative for D2.

Sailor Senshi · Post Post #1258 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:19 am

In post 1161, popsofctown wrote:What's NDP?

No Dead Person

Lady Eventide · Post Post #1259 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:21 am

@Gameplay: Same question; what are your current reads of Dannfor and RCE?

Tana and Ephraim · Post Post #1260 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:21 am

Which SS head is here posting?

gameplay506 · Post Post #1261 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:26 am

In post 1259, Lady Eventide wrote:@Gameplay: Same question; what are your current reads of Dannfor and RCE?

I have Dann as town
As for RCE idk
Can't really recall any of his posts and I didn't really follow his logic that someone was trying to distract from a Bitmap lynch. It didn't seem very probable tbf.

Sailor Senshi · Post Post #1262 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:28 am

In post 1167, Tana and Ephraim wrote:Also, all the defenses and the attempts to form counterwagons to them have been some bullshit thus far.
Chaos wind being like "oh yeah that is so town" when all they did was vote DDL without giving reasons and repeatedly say they needed following up on.
Popsofctown avoiding calling them out in their readslist, then calling them scum after, then still not voting them.
RCE saying a ton of stuff that really doesn't make any sense to justify pushing on multiple different people.

~Ephraim

Glad we’re mindmelding here. I’ll sheep you on any of LE, Pops, RCE. I’m still having trouble thinking his saying Krazy tried to derail Bitmap wagon, comes from town.

Tana and Ephraim · Post Post #1263 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:29 am

Why not Chaos Wind?

Lady Eventide · Post Post #1264 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:31 am

Hmmmm.

Reread is saying that Bitmap is likely town to me. Which says...

VOTE: RCEnigma

I feel that your theory, if actually believed, ought to have led to a vote on Dannfor, not on Senshi. Why do you believe Senshi/Tana scum/scum before considering Dannfor at all?

Chaos Wind · Post Post #1265 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:33 am

In post 1196, Tana and Ephraim wrote:If they're scum this is a scum lynch which is great.

If this is town we're killing someone who is never going to do anything more than what they've done so far.

And they have made some
awful
takes so far this game.

Good morning to you too

-Wind

gameplay506 · Post Post #1266 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:33 am

In post 1264, Lady Eventide wrote:Hmmmm.

Reread is saying that Bitmap is likely town to me. Which says...

VOTE: RCEnigma

I feel that your theory, if actually believed, ought to have led to a vote on Dannfor, not on Senshi. Why do you believe Senshi/Tana scum/scum before considering Dannfor at all?

Mmm can you explain

Chaos Wind · Post Post #1267 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:34 am

In post 1203, popsofctown wrote:Well. Suppose Chaos Wind is stupid as I am. Isn't it town indicative for Chaos Wind, then?

Am I supposed to be insulted I can’t tell

-Wind

Sailor Senshi · Post Post #1268 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:34 am

In post 1191, Lady Eventide wrote:
In post 1174, Tana and Ephraim wrote:
In post 1173, Lady Eventide wrote:It's pretty clear that you're more confident here than you should be. That you choose to nitpick phrasing rather than engage with the argument that you seem like you have TMI speaks volumes.
If I hypothetically had TMI, wouldn't that still make you scum?
... No!?

What the christ. You're being over-certain which is a common scumtell. I should
not
have to explain something so basic to you.

In post 1168, Tana and Ephraim wrote:Like I suppose I'd be down to lynch Pops instead but I'd still want to lynch LE after.

In post 1176, popsofctown wrote:I hard townread Tana and Ephraim, can you do distancing plays with one direction going like that?

I mean, I don't really know. I don't really do like football playbook mafia when I roll scum. Might make me lose.
This is what makes it pretty hardcore if it's distancing.

In post 1175, Tana and Ephraim wrote:What's so hardcore distancing? I'm putting her as a viable lynch somewhere down the line while not actively pushing her and encouraging the lynch to go elsewhere. That's barebones distancing at best.
Why are you encouraging me to scumread you and to believe in an associative you think is false?

In post 1178, Tana and Ephraim wrote:
In post 1173, Lady Eventide wrote:4: Why are you backing off now if you're still convinced I'm scum?
Wait when did I back off?
You're now saying that you might lynch pops before me, while saying that your case on them is still weaker than mine and largely based on associatives with me.
That's a bad look.

In post 1179, Titus wrote:Can we just lynch already? My detesting day 1 is really kicking in.
... Really interesting that it happened to kick in right now. Hrmmmm.

E & T are town. And the only one looking bad here is you for sr them.

Chaos Wind · Post Post #1269 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:36 am

In post 1212, Bitmap wrote:
In post 1210, popsofctown wrote:Could you rewrite 1208 so it's coherent?
Why are you defending someone who is scummy? Are you trying to sway/pocket Chaos Wind into voting in your favor? You did this to me the last two times you were scum so I don't like how you're defending Chaos Wind.

This first line is scummy, it feels like it’s trying to discredit pops’s read because it’s going against consensus

-Wind

Sailor Senshi · Post Post #1270 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:36 am

In post 1193, Tana and Ephraim wrote:
In post 1191, Lady Eventide wrote:You're now saying that you might lynch pops before me, while saying that your case on them is still weaker than mine and largely based on associatives with me. That's a bad look.
What are you gonna do about it?

She can’t answer that because it’s too “basic”. lmao

Lady Eventide · Post Post #1271 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:37 am

In post 1266, gameplay506 wrote:
In post 1264, Lady Eventide wrote:Hmmmm.

Reread is saying that Bitmap is likely town to me. Which says...

VOTE: RCEnigma

I feel that your theory, if actually believed, ought to have led to a vote on Dannfor, not on Senshi. Why do you believe Senshi/Tana scum/scum before considering Dannfor at all?
Mmm can you explain

The theory they put forwards is that the tana/senshi fight was staged/inflamed to distract from the bitmap wagon. If so, then either A: Senshi and/or Tana have excellent acting skills in order to stage that, or B: Dannfor was an instigator from the sidelines. Having reread that section, B seems far more plausible to me.

gameplay506 · Post Post #1272 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:37 am

In post 1269, Chaos Wind wrote:
In post 1212, Bitmap wrote:
In post 1210, popsofctown wrote:Could you rewrite 1208 so it's coherent?
Why are you defending someone who is scummy? Are you trying to sway/pocket Chaos Wind into voting in your favor? You did this to me the last two times you were scum so I don't like how you're defending Chaos Wind.
This first line is scummy, it feels like it’s trying to discredit pops’s read because it’s going against consensus

-Wind

That's kinda out of context.

Bitmap · Post Post #1273 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:38 am

In post 1269, Chaos Wind wrote:
In post 1212, Bitmap wrote:
In post 1210, popsofctown wrote:Could you rewrite 1208 so it's coherent?
Why are you defending someone who is scummy? Are you trying to sway/pocket Chaos Wind into voting in your favor? You did this to me the last two times you were scum so I don't like how you're defending Chaos Wind.
This first line is scummy, it feels like it’s trying to discredit pops’s read because it’s going against consensus

-Wind

What consensus? Your name hasn't appeared in awhile till RC called you out.

Chaos Wind · Post Post #1274 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:40 am

In post 1272, gameplay506 wrote:
In post 1269, Chaos Wind wrote:
In post 1212, Bitmap wrote:
In post 1210, popsofctown wrote:Could you rewrite 1208 so it's coherent?
Why are you defending someone who is scummy? Are you trying to sway/pocket Chaos Wind into voting in your favor? You did this to me the last two times you were scum so I don't like how you're defending Chaos Wind.
This first line is scummy, it feels like it’s trying to discredit pops’s read because it’s going against consensus

-Wind
That's kinda out of context.

Not really though?

-Wind