In post 677, chkflip wrote:The fact that there's a fucking GUNSMITH legitimizes their claim further.
Pedit: AND POTENTIALLY SHOOT ANOTHER TOWNIE WTF ARE YOU EVEN ON ABOUT
In post 679, chkflip wrote:That's not how lynching works.
Like
It's fucking BIZARRE to me that I have to have this conversation with you.
There's a GUNSMITH
NOT A COP
A. FUCKING. GUNSMITH.
THAT MAKES HIS CLAIM LIKE 99.99999999999999999999999999%
CONFIRMED
HOW BOUT WE LYNCH FROM THAT POOL INSTEAD
In post 681, chkflip wrote:Mord has not claimed, is in the pool, and is a scum butt.
Lynch the scumbutt.
This is all so wrong. Chkflip you and Titus just lost a town game against an obvscum xReckonerx, so I am really not going to let you lead another town to its doom.In post 682, Titus wrote:VOTE: Mord
Korina, I'd be more sympathetic to your argument if you actually agreed with it when I posted it. Yet, you went off on the IC bc cult.
GI's role if vengeful can shock the crap out of a mythical cult leader. So I'm not interested.
Killing GI is completely compatible with killing Mordhaus. If you believe his claim, we can direct his shot to Mordhaus. If you do not believe his claim, we have just removed a scum. There is absolutely no loss to killing GI. He isn't trying this game and I would rather follow my guilty than satisfy your vanity wagon. But, an opportunity has presented itself! Even if I am wrong, we can satisfy BOTH of our vanity wagons! YAYYYY
While I have your attention, please address my points about GI being scum. I've already touched on the last point.
In post 667, gobbledygook wrote:1. TD kill makes most sense coming from GI scum
2. GI Day 1 play was super scummy
3. GI claim was super scummy
4. Really there’s no downside to killing GI here because we can still use his venge kill even if we happened to be wrong.