I'M NOT TRYING TO PAINT ANYTHING YOUR DOING AS SCUM RIGHT NOW.In post 2244, Tana and Ephraim wrote:Ok
Is it possible that at 2:48 AM my time when I've been going to bed at reasonable hours for weeks my mental faculties aren't entirely there and I misread questions?
What's the scum motivation in the misrepresentation / taking it out of context / whatever
What?In post 1544, Titus wrote:If you got a problem with that, deal with it in a PT.
And your slot argued against that then. But now that that's no longer convenient, you've changed your tune. Not only that, I thought you were uninterested in how I characterizw my own play? Your case is falling apart, RC.
Okay this makes 0 sense. If Titus is TMIing the team why does LLD say none of it looks like bussing?In post 1562, popsofctown wrote:LLD's case is that it's suspicious you have multiple cases and none of them seem likely to be busses, proving you know the scumteam because you are outperforming rand.
@titus
In post 2251, Tana and Ephraim wrote:I was referring less to the AtE itself
and more to the calling me an egoist and saying that i treat others like pawns, etc. more the unnecessarily hurtful things that she was saying that she said she had a meta of saying as scum.
Turnavour is fair play: Isn't this AtE?In post 2251, Tana and Ephraim wrote:I was referring less to the AtE itself
and more to the calling me an egoist and saying that i treat others like pawns, etc. more theunnecessarily hurtful thingsthat she was saying that she said she had a meta of saying as scum.
Um no. RC is pushing you for your logic, not his. It's the same thing for me pushing Bitmap for his "inconsistency" bout scum starting wagons, I believed Bitmap here was making sense generally bit that doesn't change the fact it seemed like he was betraying his own beliefs. RC is saying you seem to be betraying your beliefs by saying the AtE isn't scummy.In post 2254, Lady Eventide wrote:And your slot argued against that then. But now that that's no longer convenient, you've changed your tune. Not only that, I thought you were uninterested in how I characterizw my own play? Your case is falling apart, RC.
Let's take another look at that list of tells, actually. Thanks for reminding me of it.
Looking for scapegoats.VS Apologizing and owning fault.
Sowing discord.VS. Promoting cooperation.
Lack of real analysis.VS. Doing serious analysis work.
Lurking for long periods. VS.Making efforts to be active.
Attacking the accuser, not the argument.VS. Engaging seriously with accusations.
Speaking for or over others.VS. Letting others speak their minds.
Appealing to emotion.VS. Using logic over emotion.
Not pushing claimed suspicions.VS. Putting real pressure on others.
Knowing too much.VS. Showing genuine uncertainty.
... Huh. Seems like by a list I made in a completely different game, in a completely different context, you're objectively far scummier than not. Interesting.
No it' really fucking notIn post 2258, Lady Eventide wrote:Turnavour is fair play: Isn't this AtE?In post 2251, Tana and Ephraim wrote:I was referring less to the AtE itself
and more to the calling me an egoist and saying that i treat others like pawns, etc. more theunnecessarily hurtful thingsthat she was saying that she said she had a meta of saying as scum.
Also, this is blatant misrepresentation. I explicitly said I was ashamed and angry at myself for doing that, and I haven't since used such tactics. I do not enjoy making the games I'm in unpleasant for others.In post 2251, Tana and Ephraim wrote:I was referring less to the AtE itself
and more to the calling me an egoist and saying that i treat others like pawns, etc. more the unnecessarily hurtful things that she was saying that she said she had a meta of saying as scum.
... saying what AtE isn't scummy? What are you referencing here?In post 2262, Gamma Emerald wrote:Um no. RC is pushing you for your logic, not his. It's the same thing for me pushing Bitmap for his "inconsistency" bout scum starting wagons, I believed Bitmap here was making sense generally bit that doesn't change the fact it seemed like he was betraying his own beliefs. RC is saying you seem to be betraying your beliefs by saying the AtE isn't scummy.In post 2254, Lady Eventide wrote:And your slot argued against that then. But now that that's no longer convenient, you've changed your tune. Not only that, I thought you were uninterested in how I characterizw my own play? Your case is falling apart, RC.
Let's take another look at that list of tells, actually. Thanks for reminding me of it.
Looking for scapegoats.VS Apologizing and owning fault.
Sowing discord.VS. Promoting cooperation.
Lack of real analysis.VS. Doing serious analysis work.
Lurking for long periods. VS.Making efforts to be active.
Attacking the accuser, not the argument.VS. Engaging seriously with accusations.
Speaking for or over others.VS. Letting others speak their minds.
Appealing to emotion.VS. Using logic over emotion.
Not pushing claimed suspicions.VS. Putting real pressure on others.
Knowing too much.VS. Showing genuine uncertainty.
... Huh. Seems like by a list I made in a completely different game, in a completely different context, you're objectively far scummier than not. Interesting.
In post 1630, Tana and Ephraim wrote:i think i lost my way in this game and need to reset
Er whatIn post 1632, Tana and Ephraim wrote:VOTE: Bitmap
Or i can just vote bitmap... which i guess it's the same thing kinda, while he does.
-Tana
Idk what I'm referencing but it doesn't matter because it's a situation of principle. You said AtE was scummy initially, then at least as the situation seems to indicate you took a different stance on AtE in practice, so RC called you out.In post 2267, Lady Eventide wrote:... saying what AtE isn't scummy? What are you referencing here?In post 2262, Gamma Emerald wrote:Um no. RC is pushing you for your logic, not his. It's the same thing for me pushing Bitmap for his "inconsistency" bout scum starting wagons, I believed Bitmap here was making sense generally bit that doesn't change the fact it seemed like he was betraying his own beliefs. RC is saying you seem to be betraying your beliefs by saying the AtE isn't scummy.In post 2254, Lady Eventide wrote:And your slot argued against that then. But now that that's no longer convenient, you've changed your tune. Not only that, I thought you were uninterested in how I characterizw my own play? Your case is falling apart, RC.
Let's take another look at that list of tells, actually. Thanks for reminding me of it.
Looking for scapegoats.VS Apologizing and owning fault.
Sowing discord.VS. Promoting cooperation.
Lack of real analysis.VS. Doing serious analysis work.
Lurking for long periods. VS.Making efforts to be active.
Attacking the accuser, not the argument.VS. Engaging seriously with accusations.
Speaking for or over others.VS. Letting others speak their minds.
Appealing to emotion.VS. Using logic over emotion.
Not pushing claimed suspicions.VS. Putting real pressure on others.
Knowing too much.VS. Showing genuine uncertainty.
... Huh. Seems like by a list I made in a completely different game, in a completely different context, you're objectively far scummier than not. Interesting.
@Pops, Gameplay: Sure, whatever, I'm fine with this; RC is big and it's hard to fight his thread control on his home turf. That said, I really hope you take a long hard look at him after my lynch, assuming that happens.
Okay noIn post 1633, Tana and Ephraim wrote:Yeah we actually should not have unvoted LE.
VOTE: Lady Eventide
I think that unvote is my signature correct scumread then derailing it to go vote town.
Maybe not but when you start trying to twist it to scumpaint the person calling you out it sure as hell is.