Because I don't start as one and have no intention of ever using that ability, yes. And as this current argument demonstrates, my role is weird enough that it's no hard barrier to lynching me.In post 2441, Tana and Ephraim wrote:So your role is even weaker than a follower then?, I mean, follower is indeed weak, but a miller tends to be assumed "to be town". Then there's IC, and there's the speculation of a sane cop existing (why else would there be a miller). Something here doesnt add up.In post 2439, Lady Eventide wrote:I don't get firm innocents; all I can say is "did not make the kill tonight, or else is a ninja." Nor do I know a sane cop exists; plus the existence of the miller part of my role implies other potential false results even if thereIn post 2436, Tana and Ephraim wrote:If Bitmap's IC is to be believed, along with your role and the existence of a sane cop that's way too much way to confirm people.
-Tanaisa sane cop. Plus scum may have transporter, roleblocker, etc. I don't think you can make this assertion with any level of certainty right now.
More importantly why didnt you mention the miller part of your role at day start? Or is it because you dont start as one?.
-Tana
... even weaker than a follower??? Look, I don't know if followers interact with ninja normally, I assume they do. I still can't get a hard guilty on scum unless I catch them making the nightkill or falseclaiming a night action. Trueclaiming a night action does not make someone an innocent, as you well know.
