I mean, from what I've seen, RVS bandwagoning is fairly common on this site.In post 24, Airan303 wrote:I find it scummy because instead of voting for anyone else to check reactions, he voted for someone who had already been voted for.
I am not saying spam is a scum, or that you should vote for him. I am just saying that what he did was scummy
Hi town, I'm DraynthIn post 26, faüstiv wrote:I'm town.
huh?In post 26, faüstiv wrote:I'm town.
Okay sure. But voting for veggie and not for anyone else is still a bit suspicious. I mean why bandwagon?Egix96 wrote:I mean, from what I've seen, RVS bandwagoning is fairly common on this site.In post 24, Airan303 wrote:I find it scummy because instead of voting for anyone else to check reactions, he voted for someone who had already been voted for.
I am not saying spam is a scum, or that you should vote for him. I am just saying that what he did was scummy
So I personally wouldn't consider it scummy, it's just a site meta thing.
Hi! If you’re town, who is mafia?In post 26, faüstiv wrote:I'm town.
for the lulz. It's RVS. I was able to think of a snarky reason to vote you more easily than I could think of one for anyone else. Also, wrt the bolded, look what reaction I got by voting someone who had already been voted.In post 29, Airan303 wrote:Okay sure. But voting for veggie and not for anyone else is still a bit suspicious. I mean why bandwagon?Egix96 wrote:I mean, from what I've seen, RVS bandwagoning is fairly common on this site.In post 24, Airan303 wrote:I find it scummy because instead of voting for anyone elseto check reactions, he voted for someone who had already been voted for.
I am not saying spam is a scum, or that you should vote for him. I am just saying that what he did was scummy
So I personally wouldn't consider it scummy, it's just a site meta thing.
Code: Select all
[b]Vote: Errantparabola[/b]
[vote]Errantparabola[/vote]
Why not bandwagon? You often get some good information from it and it progesses the gameIn post 29, Airan303 wrote:Okay sure. But voting for veggie and not for anyone else is still a bit suspicious. I mean why bandwagon?Egix96 wrote:I mean, from what I've seen, RVS bandwagoning is fairly common on this site.In post 24, Airan303 wrote:I find it scummy because instead of voting for anyone else to check reactions, he voted for someone who had already been voted for.
I am not saying spam is a scum, or that you should vote for him. I am just saying that what he did was scummy
So I personally wouldn't consider it scummy, it's just a site meta thing.
I thought about this in my first game on here too. I thought it was scummy (it ended up being so for different reasons), but not for meta reasons. Bandwagon RVS on d1 increases pressure and encourages discussion! So for now, let’s not punish someone for bandwagoning this early when there’s nothing to go off of.In post 29, Airan303 wrote:Okay sure. But voting for veggie and not for anyone else is still a bit suspicious. I mean why bandwagon?Egix96 wrote:I mean, from what I've seen, RVS bandwagoning is fairly common on this site.In post 24, Airan303 wrote:I find it scummy because instead of voting for anyone else to check reactions, he voted for someone who had already been voted for.
I am not saying spam is a scum, or that you should vote for him. I am just saying that what he did was scummy
So I personally wouldn't consider it scummy, it's just a site meta thing.
Not speaking for Airan here, but just wanted to put my .02 in. Bandwagoning isn't bad and it kick-started the game in this case! But I think that it can be inherently suspicious depending on the order that people decide to jump on the bandwagon. Spam put the second vote in, which (to me) makes them more suspicious than Draynth putting the first vote in. Ofc it's still not a strong indication of Spam being scum though. Just wanted to say that order matters.In post 35, Draynth wrote:Why not bandwagon? You often get some good information from it and it progesses the gameIn post 29, Airan303 wrote:Okay sure. But voting for veggie and not for anyone else is still a bit suspicious. I mean why bandwagon?Egix96 wrote:I mean, from what I've seen, RVS bandwagoning is fairly common on this site.In post 24, Airan303 wrote:I find it scummy because instead of voting for anyone else to check reactions, he voted for someone who had already been voted for.
I am not saying spam is a scum, or that you should vote for him. I am just saying that what he did was scummy
So I personally wouldn't consider it scummy, it's just a site meta thing.
Why do you find it inherently suspicious?
Yes, and with the fact that a majority requires 5, at this point, you are most certainly being paranoid.In post 39, Airan303 wrote:Ok thanks for all the replies. This is my first game here, so it’s natural I might find scum where there isn’t any. I just find bandwagons a bit suspicious, because scum might jump upon them quickly to get an innocent lynched. But because the bandwagon was at the start of the game, I am probably being a bit too paranoid.
What does lolhammered mean?Spangled wrote:Yes, and with the fact that a majority requires 5, at this point, you are most certainly being paranoid.In post 39, Airan303 wrote:Ok thanks for all the replies. This is my first game here, so it’s natural I might find scum where there isn’t any. I just find bandwagons a bit suspicious, because scum might jump upon them quickly to get an innocent lynched. But because the bandwagon was at the start of the game, I am probably being a bit too paranoid.
Don’t think anyone tends to get lolhammered in RVS, especially not in the newbie queue.
Oh, sorry. Generally, if a player is at L-1 (one vote away from being lynched, which happens when a majority in votes is reached), people wait for a more-or-less consensus from the general thread, and a roleclaim, and give warning in advance so that the person about to be lynched can share last thoughts if they’re town. Lolhammering means you probably don’t wait for most of that; you go ahead and cast the last vote, known as a hammer.In post 41, Airan303 wrote:What does lolhammered mean?Spangled wrote:Yes, and with the fact that a majority requires 5, at this point, you are most certainly being paranoid.In post 39, Airan303 wrote:Ok thanks for all the replies. This is my first game here, so it’s natural I might find scum where there isn’t any. I just find bandwagons a bit suspicious, because scum might jump upon them quickly to get an innocent lynched. But because the bandwagon was at the start of the game, I am probably being a bit too paranoid.
Don’t think anyone tends to get lolhammered in RVS, especially not in the newbie queue.
@bolded: Hm, in what way?In post 34, UrVeggieM8 wrote:Thanks for your insight Airan!
As the person receiving Spam's vote, when I first read their post my gut reaction was "that seems a bit lhf-ish.Maybe they're doing that to try and get information out of everyone"... which is not necessarily a scum move. To me personally, Spam doesn't quite read as scummy... just suspicious.
Interested in hearing what everyone else thinks!
LHF because that the comment Spam made is one that vegos tend to hear a lot as a provocation. I'm not entirely sure if Spam would have commented the way they did if it wasn't following the previous comment from Draynth "I just ate a vegetarian meal". I feel that Spam may have used the previous comment as context for their reply. Hope I explained that in a way that makes sense?In post 43, Egix96 wrote:@bolded: Hm, in what way?In post 34, UrVeggieM8 wrote:Thanks for your insight Airan!
As the person receiving Spam's vote, when I first read their post my gut reaction was "that seems a bit lhf-ish.Maybe they're doing that to try and get information out of everyone"... which is not necessarily a scum move. To me personally, Spam doesn't quite read as scummy... just suspicious.
Interested in hearing what everyone else thinks!
How would you define the term LHF?
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}
I do understand that their comment was most likely made for the purpose of gathering information, irrespective of what their actual opinion on vegetables is! LOL Tbh I don't really get what that has to do with low hanging fruit in the mafia sense but... okay...In post 44, UrVeggieM8 wrote:LHF because that the comment Spam made is one that vegos tend to hear a lot as a provocation. I'm not entirely sure if Spam would have commented the way they did if it wasn't following the previous comment from Draynth "I just ate a vegetarian meal". I feel that Spam may have used the previous comment as context for their reply. Hope I explained that in a way that makes sense?In post 43, Egix96 wrote:@bolded: Hm, in what way?In post 34, UrVeggieM8 wrote:Thanks for your insight Airan!
As the person receiving Spam's vote, when I first read their post my gut reaction was "that seems a bit lhf-ish.Maybe they're doing that to try and get information out of everyone"... which is not necessarily a scum move. To me personally, Spam doesn't quite read as scummy... just suspicious.
Interested in hearing what everyone else thinks!
How would you define the term LHF?
Ofc though, whether someone is vego or not is completely irrelevant here so nothing was taken seriously and no feelings were trampled on
Did some hunting around the webz and sounds like I've misunderstood the meaning of LHF in the mafia sense.In post 45, Egix96 wrote:Tbh I don't really get what that has to do with low hanging fruit in the mafia sense but... okay...In post 44, UrVeggieM8 wrote:LHF because that the comment Spam made is one that vegos tend to hear a lot as a provocation. I'm not entirely sure if Spam would have commented the way they did if it wasn't following the previous comment from Draynth "I just ate a vegetarian meal". I feel that Spam may have used the previous comment as context for their reply. Hope I explained that in a way that makes sense?In post 43, Egix96 wrote:@bolded: Hm, in what way?In post 34, UrVeggieM8 wrote:Thanks for your insight Airan!
As the person receiving Spam's vote, when I first read their post my gut reaction was "that seems a bit lhf-ish.Maybe they're doing that to try and get information out of everyone"... which is not necessarily a scum move. To me personally, Spam doesn't quite read as scummy... just suspicious.
Interested in hearing what everyone else thinks!
How would you define the term LHF?
Ofc though, whether someone is vego or not is completely irrelevant here so nothing was taken seriously and no feelings were trampled on
Apologies for that! In this case I meant LHF in the sense that I felt Spam was using a common provocation to try and get information. Will be sure to use LHF in the mafia sense from now on! I love that you are being “paranoid”. We all need to dig deep and figure out who the scum is, regardless if sometimes we make a wrong read. If you voice your opinion and your scumread is flawed, people are gonna call you out for it because we all want to win (as long as your accusations aren’t scummy!)In post 39, Airan303 wrote:Ok thanks for all the replies. This is my first game here, so it’s natural I might find scum where there isn’t any. I just find bandwagons a bit suspicious, because scum might jump upon them quickly to get an innocent lynched. But because the bandwagon was at the start of the game, I am probably being a bit too paranoid.
Why are you voting me?In post 36, UrVeggieM8 wrote:VOTE: faustiv
Sorry, reposting because I voted the incorrect way before!
This might be because you seem (through no fault of your own) a bit of a lurker.faüstiv wrote:Why are you voting me?In post 36, UrVeggieM8 wrote:VOTE: faustiv
Sorry, reposting because I voted the incorrect way before!