if you can't find your drugs, you can sleep without them
and if you want to go home, you can call a taxi
and if you don't want to talk, you can sit in the
backseat
- Drunk Drivers / Killer Whales (Single Version),
Somebody hasn't played enough newbie games then. Accidental rvs quicklynches are always a risk if a lolwagon gets to L-1.In post 40, Spangled wrote:Yes, and with the fact that a majority requires 5, at this point, you are most certainly being paranoid.In post 39, Airan303 wrote:Ok thanks for all the replies. This is my first game here, so it’s natural I might find scum where there isn’t any. I just find bandwagons a bit suspicious, because scum might jump upon them quickly to get an innocent lynched. But because the bandwagon was at the start of the game, I am probably being a bit too paranoid.
Don’t think anyone tends to get lolhammered in RVS, especially not in the newbie queue.
tone is all wrong. regardless of whether I like what you're saaying, you're saying it in a way that sounds far more like newb!scum than newb!town.In post 53, Jamelia wrote:Why’s that?
Hmm. What have I said to make you think that?In post 54, NotMySpamAccount wrote:tone is all wrong. regardless of whether I like what you're saaying, you're saying it in a way that sounds far more like newb!scum than newb!town.In post 53, Jamelia wrote:Why’s that?
Gotcha. Is that like a meta thing? To use too many exclamation points or something?In post 56, NotMySpamAccount wrote:to put it simply (and not quite accurately), you're using too many exclamation points. More precisely, it sounds like pocketing/ingratiating yourself with people. In my experience, this comes more from newb!scum wanting to sound genuine than from newb!town who are extremely excited.
not specifically meta, but more my experience with the tendency of newb!scum to act extremely excited.In post 57, Jamelia wrote:Gotcha. Is that like a meta thing? To use too many exclamation points or something?In post 56, NotMySpamAccount wrote:to put it simply (and not quite accurately), you're using too many exclamation points. More precisely, it sounds like pocketing/ingratiating yourself with people. In my experience, this comes more from newb!scum wanting to sound genuine than from newb!town who are extremely excited.
Aye, but the wagon which we were talking about was at... L-3. A quicklynch there seems unlikely.In post 51, NotMySpamAccount wrote:Somebody hasn't played enough newbie games then. Accidental rvs quicklynches are always a risk if a lolwagon gets to L-1.In post 40, Spangled wrote:Yes, and with the fact that a majority requires 5, at this point, you are most certainly being paranoid.In post 39, Airan303 wrote:Ok thanks for all the replies. This is my first game here, so it’s natural I might find scum where there isn’t any. I just find bandwagons a bit suspicious, because scum might jump upon them quickly to get an innocent lynched. But because the bandwagon was at the start of the game, I am probably being a bit too paranoid.
Don’t think anyone tends to get lolhammered in RVS, especially not in the newbie queue.
In post 58, NotMySpamAccount wrote:not specifically meta, but more my experience with the tendency of newb!scum to act extremely excited.In post 57, Jamelia wrote:Gotcha. Is that like a meta thing? To use too many exclamation points or something?In post 56, NotMySpamAccount wrote:to put it simply (and not quite accurately), you're using too many exclamation points. More precisely, it sounds like pocketing/ingratiating yourself with people. In my experience, this comes more from newb!scum wanting to sound genuine than from newb!town who are extremely excited.
Jamelia’s tone and entrance is certainly different to their only previous newbie game, but I don’t think I can call them scum over it. I am not willing to put my vote there just yet, but I will consider it.In post 56, NotMySpamAccount wrote:to put it simply (and not quite accurately), you're using too many exclamation points. More precisely, it sounds like pocketing/ingratiating yourself with people. In my experience, this comes more from newb!scum wanting to sound genuine than from newb!town who are extremely excited.
In post 24, Airan303 wrote:I find it scummy because instead of voting for anyone else to check reactions, he voted for someone who had already been voted for.
I am not saying spam is a scum, or that you should vote for him. I am just saying that what he did was scummy
In post 29, Airan303 wrote:Okay sure. But voting for veggie and not for anyone else is still a bit suspicious. I mean why bandwagon?Egix96 wrote:I mean, from what I've seen, RVS bandwagoning is fairly common on this site.In post 24, Airan303 wrote:I find it scummy because instead of voting for anyone else to check reactions, he voted for someone who had already been voted for.
I am not saying spam is a scum, or that you should vote for him. I am just saying that what he did was scummy
So I personally wouldn't consider it scummy, it's just a site meta thing.
In post 25, Egix96 wrote:I mean, from what I've seen, RVS bandwagoning is fairly common on this site.In post 24, Airan303 wrote:I find it scummy because instead of voting for anyone else to check reactions, he voted for someone who had already been voted for.
I am not saying spam is a scum, or that you should vote for him. I am just saying that what he did was scummy
So I personally wouldn't consider it scummy, it's just a site meta thing.
In post 32, NotMySpamAccount wrote:for the lulz. It's RVS. I was able to think of a snarky reason to vote you more easily than I could think of one for anyone else. Also, wrt the bolded, look what reaction I got by voting someone who had already been voted.In post 29, Airan303 wrote:Okay sure. But voting for veggie and not for anyone else is still a bit suspicious. I mean why bandwagon?Egix96 wrote:I mean, from what I've seen, RVS bandwagoning is fairly common on this site.In post 24, Airan303 wrote:I find it scummy because instead of voting for anyone elseto check reactions, he voted for someone who had already been voted for.
I am not saying spam is a scum, or that you should vote for him. I am just saying that what he did was scummy
So I personally wouldn't consider it scummy, it's just a site meta thing.
In post 34, UrVeggieM8 wrote:Thanks for your insight Airan!
As the person receiving Spam's vote, when I first read their post my gut reaction was "that seems a bit lhf-ish. Maybe they're doing that to try and get information out of everyone"... which is not necessarily a scum move. To me personally, Spam doesn't quite read as scummy... just suspicious.
Interested in hearing what everyone else thinks!
In post 35, Draynth wrote:Why not bandwagon? You often get some good information from it and it progesses the gameIn post 29, Airan303 wrote:Okay sure. But voting for veggie and not for anyone else is still a bit suspicious. I mean why bandwagon?Egix96 wrote:I mean, from what I've seen, RVS bandwagoning is fairly common on this site.In post 24, Airan303 wrote:I find it scummy because instead of voting for anyone else to check reactions, he voted for someone who had already been voted for.
I am not saying spam is a scum, or that you should vote for him. I am just saying that what he did was scummy
So I personally wouldn't consider it scummy, it's just a site meta thing.
Why do you find it inherently suspicious?
In post 38, UrVeggieM8 wrote:Not speaking for Airan here, but just wanted to put my .02 in. Bandwagoning isn't bad and it kick-started the game in this case! But I think that it can be inherently suspicious depending on the order that people decide to jump on the bandwagon. Spam put the second vote in, which (to me) makes them more suspicious than Draynth putting the first vote in. Ofc it's still not a strong indication of Spam being scum though. Just wanted to say that order matters.In post 35, Draynth wrote:Why not bandwagon? You often get some good information from it and it progesses the gameIn post 29, Airan303 wrote:Okay sure. But voting for veggie and not for anyone else is still a bit suspicious. I mean why bandwagon?Egix96 wrote:I mean, from what I've seen, RVS bandwagoning is fairly common on this site.In post 24, Airan303 wrote:I find it scummy because instead of voting for anyone else to check reactions, he voted for someone who had already been voted for.
I am not saying spam is a scum, or that you should vote for him. I am just saying that what he did was scummy
So I personally wouldn't consider it scummy, it's just a site meta thing.
Why do you find it inherently suspicious?
In post 39, Airan303 wrote:Ok thanks for all the replies. This is my first game here, so it’s natural I might find scum where there isn’t any. I just find bandwagons a bit suspicious, because scum might jump upon them quickly to get an innocent lynched. But because the bandwagon was at the start of the game, I am probably being a bit too paranoid.
In post 40, Spangled wrote:Yes, and with the fact that a majority requires 5, at this point, you are most certainly being paranoid.In post 39, Airan303 wrote:Ok thanks for all the replies. This is my first game here, so it’s natural I might find scum where there isn’t any. I just find bandwagons a bit suspicious, because scum might jump upon them quickly to get an innocent lynched. But because the bandwagon was at the start of the game, I am probably being a bit too paranoid.
Don’t think anyone tends to get lolhammered in RVS, especially not in the newbie queue.
Discussion of the bandwagon in RVS went on for way too long to not have scum prolonging itIn post 41, Airan303 wrote:What does lolhammered mean?Spangled wrote:Yes, and with the fact that a majority requires 5, at this point, you are most certainly being paranoid.In post 39, Airan303 wrote:Ok thanks for all the replies. This is my first game here, so it’s natural I might find scum where there isn’t any. I just find bandwagons a bit suspicious, because scum might jump upon them quickly to get an innocent lynched. But because the bandwagon was at the start of the game, I am probably being a bit too paranoid.
Don’t think anyone tends to get lolhammered in RVS, especially not in the newbie queue.
Could you explain the difference?In post 61, Spangled wrote:In post 58, NotMySpamAccount wrote:not specifically meta, but more my experience with the tendency of newb!scum to act extremely excited.In post 57, Jamelia wrote:Gotcha. Is that like a meta thing? To use too many exclamation points or something?In post 56, NotMySpamAccount wrote:to put it simply (and not quite accurately), you're using too many exclamation points. More precisely, it sounds like pocketing/ingratiating yourself with people. In my experience, this comes more from newb!scum wanting to sound genuine than from newb!town who are extremely excited.Jamelia’s tone and entrance is certainly different to their only previous newbie game, but I don’t think I can call them scum over it. I am not willing to put my vote there just yet, but I will consider it.In post 56, NotMySpamAccount wrote:to put it simply (and not quite accurately), you're using too many exclamation points. More precisely, it sounds like pocketing/ingratiating yourself with people. In my experience, this comes more from newb!scum wanting to sound genuine than from newb!town who are extremely excited.
@faüstiv This. Would like to see some more discussion from you if possible. Commentary on the overall game or reads on people... it all helps.In post 49, Airan303 wrote:This might be because you seem (through no fault of your own) a bit of a lurker.faüstiv wrote:Why are you voting me?In post 36, UrVeggieM8 wrote:VOTE: faustiv
Sorry, reposting because I voted the incorrect way before!
Disclaimer: I wasn’t in their other game, but I have their ISO for it pulled up.In post 64, Geyde wrote:Could you explain the difference?In post 61, Spangled wrote:In post 58, NotMySpamAccount wrote:not specifically meta, but more my experience with the tendency of newb!scum to act extremely excited.In post 57, Jamelia wrote:Gotcha. Is that like a meta thing? To use too many exclamation points or something?In post 56, NotMySpamAccount wrote:to put it simply (and not quite accurately), you're using too many exclamation points. More precisely, it sounds like pocketing/ingratiating yourself with people. In my experience, this comes more from newb!scum wanting to sound genuine than from newb!town who are extremely excited.Jamelia’s tone and entrance is certainly different to their only previous newbie game, but I don’t think I can call them scum over it. I am not willing to put my vote there just yet, but I will consider it.In post 56, NotMySpamAccount wrote:to put it simply (and not quite accurately), you're using too many exclamation points. More precisely, it sounds like pocketing/ingratiating yourself with people. In my experience, this comes more from newb!scum wanting to sound genuine than from newb!town who are extremely excited.
Giving an early townread to Veggie, I think; 66 is the best question asked so far.In post 66, UrVeggieM8 wrote:@Geyde Following that huge thread about hammering in RVS... out of interest, who read as the scummiest to you and why?
I agreeSpangled wrote:Giving an early townread to Veggie, I think; 66 is the best question asked so far.In post 66, UrVeggieM8 wrote:@Geyde Following that huge thread about hammering in RVS... out of interest, who read as the scummiest to you and why?
May I ask you why?In post 71, faüstiv wrote:Scumreading Spangled so far.
You're being too passive.In post 72, Spangled wrote:May I ask you why?In post 71, faüstiv wrote:Scumreading Spangled so far.