you know i don't really care about pronounsIn post 7196, the worst wrote:pops is a lady
but apologies to anyone who takes offence to my abuse of them
you know i don't really care about pronounsIn post 7196, the worst wrote:pops is a lady
I know it isn'tIn post 7199, Dannflor wrote:popsofctown -Why are people scum reading this?There's no scum agenda in her posting her attempts to engage both Fire and Chennis are overtly townie imo. A lot of effort was put in there for strictly a pro-town outcome in both cases. This is a strong gut tone read I've had since the beginning of the game. I know drunk posting isn't town indicative but I'll read a post like #6974 and just be like... yup that's town. She has this casual flowy way of moving around the game that just seems very hard to replicate as scum over such a large volume of posts.I'd like to see some actual cases in regards to the scum reads on this slotbecause I'm not seeing the apparent weirdness others are seeing.
multiple people have been moving their vote around a lot todayIn post 7195, Iconeum wrote:Literally all over the place, hoping one of these wagons draws enough attention away from him is how I read all of this.
VOTE: pops
it's not a caseIn post 7203, Iconeum wrote:I know it isn'tIn post 7199, Dannflor wrote:popsofctown -Why are people scum reading this?There's no scum agenda in her posting her attempts to engage both Fire and Chennis are overtly townie imo. A lot of effort was put in there for strictly a pro-town outcome in both cases. This is a strong gut tone read I've had since the beginning of the game. I know drunk posting isn't town indicative but I'll read a post like #6974 and just be like... yup that's town. She has this casual flowy way of moving around the game that just seems very hard to replicate as scum over such a large volume of posts.I'd like to see some actual cases in regards to the scum reads on this slotbecause I'm not seeing the apparent weirdness others are seeing.thatmuch what I posted just a few minutes ago but it's still a case. Had you read that yet?
like this is clearly a line in to engaging with Fire on the governor and actually taking the time and effort to appeal to his logicIn post 7195, Iconeum wrote:This feels fake. Presenting yourself as a self-sacrifice without being at risk yet is easy.In post 7158, popsofctown wrote:Firebringer if I get lynched and I ask you to please not govern would you not govern because I'm town and I asked?
Disagree. This is pops working on emotions, trying to appearIn post 7207, Dannflor wrote:like this is clearly a line in to engaging with Fire on the governor and actually taking the time and effort to appeal to his logicIn post 7195, Iconeum wrote:This feels fake. Presenting yourself as a self-sacrifice without being at risk yet is easy.In post 7158, popsofctown wrote:Firebringer if I get lynched and I ask you to please not govern would you not govern because I'm town and I asked?
Ugh it's a case to me. FTR i am not *intentionally* snarky but if you think what I quoted is actually pro-town then we should definitely talk about itIn post 7206, Dannflor wrote:it's not a caseIn post 7203, Iconeum wrote:I know it isn'tIn post 7199, Dannflor wrote:popsofctown -Why are people scum reading this?There's no scum agenda in her posting her attempts to engage both Fire and Chennis are overtly townie imo. A lot of effort was put in there for strictly a pro-town outcome in both cases. This is a strong gut tone read I've had since the beginning of the game. I know drunk posting isn't town indicative but I'll read a post like #6974 and just be like... yup that's town. She has this casual flowy way of moving around the game that just seems very hard to replicate as scum over such a large volume of posts.I'd like to see some actual cases in regards to the scum reads on this slotbecause I'm not seeing the apparent weirdness others are seeing.thatmuch what I posted just a few minutes ago but it's still a case. Had you read that yet?
it's you quoting some actually pro-town things in her ISO and making snarky comments
So Chennis is basicly a vanity wagon then, right?In post 7205, popsofctown wrote:duck, you're a lost cause, but Iconeum, come the fuck on. chennisden is at L-infinity. The idea that I am hoping a chennisden lynch catches on in self defense is absurd; there's at least 3 more viable lynches available today. It's not going to catch on. I posted it because the worst said I had "posted a lot yet hadn't managed to be protown all game", and it struck home a bit, so I wanted to do something and put some kind of work in
like the vanity vote on chennis doesn't do much but that's ignoring the case work she did on him which does do a lot, even if not right nowIn post 7212, Iconeum wrote:Ugh it's a case to me. FTR i am not *intentionally* snarky but if you think what I quoted is actually pro-town then we should definitely talk about it
Actual question: were you reading LLD as frustrated town as well, or did you think that was scum faking it?In post 7211, Dannflor wrote:I know I'm weak to AtE
I've been end gamed by scum that just AtE'd really well
it's something I've accepted about myself
but I have a really hard time reading #7208 and #7209 as anything but frustrated town
the only thing i'm having second thoughts about is that her vote on Chennis doesn't really accomplish much for a scum agenda, unless setting up associations for what she might think is a probably lynch on herIn post 7215, Dannflor wrote:like the vanity vote on chennis doesn't do much but that's ignoring the case work she did on him which does do a lot, even if not right nowIn post 7212, Iconeum wrote:Ugh it's a case to me. FTR i am not *intentionally* snarky but if you think what I quoted is actually pro-town then we should definitely talk about it
I'm not taking one for the team, if I get to L-1 I will fight my lynch like a mutt.In post 7210, Iconeum wrote:Disagree. This is pops working on emotions, trying to appearIn post 7207, Dannflor wrote:like this is clearly a line in to engaging with Fire on the governor and actually taking the time and effort to appeal to his logicIn post 7195, Iconeum wrote:This feels fake. Presenting yourself as a self-sacrifice without being at risk yet is easy.In post 7158, popsofctown wrote:Firebringer if I get lynched and I ask you to please not govern would you not govern because I'm town and I asked?sheis willing to 'take one for the team' when the time comes. I don't see how you townread that.
WHAT TIPPED YOU OFF, WHEN I CALLED IT A VANITY WAGON IN THE POST YOU QUOTED, WHILE CALLING IT A LHF WAGON????In post 7213, Iconeum wrote:So Chennis is basicly a vanity wagon then, right?In post 7205, popsofctown wrote:duck, you're a lost cause, but Iconeum, come the fuck on. chennisden is at L-infinity. The idea that I am hoping a chennisden lynch catches on in self defense is absurd; there's at least 3 more viable lynches available today. It's not going to catch on. I posted it because the worst said I had "posted a lot yet hadn't managed to be protown all game", and it struck home a bit, so I wanted to do something and put some kind of work in
exactlyIn post 7217, Iconeum wrote:the only thing i'm having second thoughts about is that her vote on Chennis doesn't really accomplish much for a scum agenda, unless setting up associations for what she might think is a probably lynch on herIn post 7215, Dannflor wrote:like the vanity vote on chennis doesn't do much but that's ignoring the case work she did on him which does do a lot, even if not right nowIn post 7212, Iconeum wrote:Ugh it's a case to me. FTR i am not *intentionally* snarky but if you think what I quoted is actually pro-town then we should definitely talk about it
blahIn post 7216, Iconeum wrote:Actual question: were you reading LLD as frustrated town as well, or did you think that was scum faking it?In post 7211, Dannflor wrote:I know I'm weak to AtE
I've been end gamed by scum that just AtE'd really well
it's something I've accepted about myself
but I have a really hard time reading #7208 and #7209 as anything but frustrated town
I don't think I called the chennis vote opportunistic. But it's a vanity vote while in the same breath arguing we shouldn't be doing that so...In post 7221, Dannflor wrote:so how is it opportunistic