if i’m not getting fucked over, i’m not getting fucked at all
- The Gun Song,
bless you
The information that will direct my vote isn’t strong enough to make anyone as a definitive scum read for me. There are a few questions left unanswered that im waiting to see responses forIn post 653, eth0s wrote:Like we are halfway into the phase and 4/7 players haven't voted yet. That's weird, right?
I agree with this and think the discussion has gotten quite stale.In post 652, eth0s wrote:With this day having gone on for 4.5 days now I think the fact that there's 4 people not voting is very odd. And I am somewhat inclined to believe the scumteam may both be apart of those 4...
In post 652, eth0s wrote:With this day having gone on for 4.5 days now I think the fact that there's 4 people not voting is very odd. And I am somewhat inclined to believe the scumteam may both be apart of those 4...
Might just be from people holding their votes to see how their scumreads act or something, idk.In post 653, eth0s wrote:Like we are halfway into the phase and 4/7 players haven't voted yet. That's weird, right?
I still think Geyde is town. Could you quote any specific posts where you didn't like his tone?In post 654, Spangled wrote:I think my townread on Geyde is more solid now, even if I disagree with some of his analysis. In some ways I don’t like his tone, but I think the way in which I don’t like his tone makes him more town, if that makes sense?
I’m quite liking Jam’s tone so far, just scrolling through his ISO and stopping at points — it’s actually all quite good.
I’m starting to paranoia about eth0s, but the last time I did that about a universal town read, theyweretown and it gave scum material to build off of to get them lynched in LyLo. I don’t think this is scum, but eth0s: can I see your most recent scumgame?
So that kinda narrows it down to faüstiv, egix and draynth, doesn’t it?
I’m going to do some ISOing here.
Last sentence feels a bit deflectional?In post 161, Jamelia wrote: As for Spam, although I do think that they have tunnel vision on me, I don’t believe their questioning and analysis is necessarily scummy. I’d like to give them the benefit of the doubt that they’re at least analyzing a lot of the game and have set their sets on one specific thing. I think that Spam would help us more if he focused on others just as much as he focused on me, but I digress.
In post 223, Jamelia wrote:So we’re at a L-2 on Aidan with Faustiv/Spam jumping on this rather quickly. Just an FYI before people continue voting.
I’d like to hear what Aidan has to say before we get to a L-1. I agree with what you’re saying but I don’t feel as strong of a scum read on Aidan as I do Faustiv at the moment. Especially after Faustiv switching his vote onto Aidan and then automatically talking about “oh I could have jumped on the other bandwagons but I jumped on THIS one, which is not scummy.”
With that being said I’d be fine with an Aidan lynch if his response is inadequate.
Beginning of first quote has a running commentary sort of tone which feels out of place.In post 225, Jamelia wrote:I am ok with it if I believe that the response Airan gives is inadequate and scummy. I already said I don’t agree with the idea of Aidan being scum, but people expose themselves when the pressure is on, especially new players (from what I saw in my last game).In post 224, faüstiv wrote:Jamellia why are you ok with an Airan lynch if I’m on the bandwagon? I’m one of your scumreads and I am advocating this lynch. Do you think me and Airan are a team?
If that’s the case, then I may be wrong about you. For now, you’re still my main scumread which is why my
vote hasn’t changed off of you.
Part after comma feels strange, but the emote implies it's not entirely serious so... idrk.In post 318, Jamelia wrote:Hi eth0s! Great analysis so far, except of course when you say you would have voted for me!
Tone here feels unnecessarily aggressive.In post 401, Jamelia wrote:If you put in this same effort as you’re doing right now, maybe you wouldn’t be in a L-1 situation? Can you please explain to me why you haven’t put in effort until now?In post 388, NotMySpamAccount wrote:UNVOTE: oh thank goodness someone is actually playing in the slot now and that's a good catchup. Airan scummed it up enough that I'm def still suspicious, but we're not lynching there today. Also, huh I'm not usually at L-1 d1, I might actually have to put in some effort.
Not a tone thing per se, but I feel that the "no maj = no lynch" rule is something you likely would have remembered from your first Newbie game (iirc it's quite hard to miss in the rules) so this doesn't really feel like a genuine derp.In post 453, Jamelia wrote:When is the deadline? If we don’t have a lynch by then, does it just go to the person with the most votes?
I'll address all of this more indepth if you need me to, but most of those have already been explained already.In post 659, Egix96 wrote:Last sentence feels a bit deflectional?In post 161, Jamelia wrote: As for Spam, although I do think that they have tunnel vision on me, I don’t believe their questioning and analysis is necessarily scummy. I’d like to give them the benefit of the doubt that they’re at least analyzing a lot of the game and have set their sets on one specific thing. I think that Spam would help us more if he focused on others just as much as he focused on me, but I digress.
In post 223, Jamelia wrote:So we’re at a L-2 on Aidan with Faustiv/Spam jumping on this rather quickly. Just an FYI before people continue voting.
I’d like to hear what Aidan has to say before we get to a L-1. I agree with what you’re saying but I don’t feel as strong of a scum read on Aidan as I do Faustiv at the moment. Especially after Faustiv switching his vote onto Aidan and then automatically talking about “oh I could have jumped on the other bandwagons but I jumped on THIS one, which is not scummy.”
With that being said I’d be fine with an Aidan lynch if his response is inadequate.Beginning of first quote has a running commentary sort of tone which feels out of place.In post 225, Jamelia wrote:I am ok with it if I believe that the response Airan gives is inadequate and scummy. I already said I don’t agree with the idea of Aidan being scum, but people expose themselves when the pressure is on, especially new players (from what I saw in my last game).In post 224, faüstiv wrote:Jamellia why are you ok with an Airan lynch if I’m on the bandwagon? I’m one of your scumreads and I am advocating this lynch. Do you think me and Airan are a team?
If that’s the case, then I may be wrong about you. For now, you’re still my main scumread which is why my
vote hasn’t changed off of you.
Second quote feels like trying to walk back from an awkward position (first sentence in last paragraph especially).
Part after comma feels strange, but the emote implies it's not entirely serious so... idrk.In post 318, Jamelia wrote:Hi eth0s! Great analysis so far, except of course when you say you would have voted for me!
Tone here feels unnecessarily aggressive.In post 401, Jamelia wrote:If you put in this same effort as you’re doing right now, maybe you wouldn’t be in a L-1 situation? Can you please explain to me why you haven’t put in effort until now?In post 388, NotMySpamAccount wrote:UNVOTE: oh thank goodness someone is actually playing in the slot now and that's a good catchup. Airan scummed it up enough that I'm def still suspicious, but we're not lynching there today. Also, huh I'm not usually at L-1 d1, I might actually have to put in some effort.
Not a tone thing per se, but I feel that the "no maj = no lynch" rule is something you likely would have remembered from your first Newbie game (iirc it's quite hard to miss in the rules) so this doesn't really feel like a genuine derp.In post 453, Jamelia wrote:When is the deadline? If we don’t have a lynch by then, does it just go to the person with the most votes?
Whew that took a while. That only goes as far as EoD1 (it's a pretty big iso). Now I gotta eat and stuff. Bye for now.
Comment on 318 takes a stance then backtrack on it in the same sentence.In post 659, Egix96 wrote:Last sentence feels a bit deflectional?In post 161, Jamelia wrote: As for Spam, although I do think that they have tunnel vision on me, I don’t believe their questioning and analysis is necessarily scummy. I’d like to give them the benefit of the doubt that they’re at least analyzing a lot of the game and have set their sets on one specific thing. I think that Spam would help us more if he focused on others just as much as he focused on me, but I digress.
In post 223, Jamelia wrote:So we’re at a L-2 on Aidan with Faustiv/Spam jumping on this rather quickly. Just an FYI before people continue voting.
I’d like to hear what Aidan has to say before we get to a L-1. I agree with what you’re saying but I don’t feel as strong of a scum read on Aidan as I do Faustiv at the moment. Especially after Faustiv switching his vote onto Aidan and then automatically talking about “oh I could have jumped on the other bandwagons but I jumped on THIS one, which is not scummy.”
With that being said I’d be fine with an Aidan lynch if his response is inadequate.Beginning of first quote has a running commentary sort of tone which feels out of place.In post 225, Jamelia wrote:I am ok with it if I believe that the response Airan gives is inadequate and scummy. I already said I don’t agree with the idea of Aidan being scum, but people expose themselves when the pressure is on, especially new players (from what I saw in my last game).In post 224, faüstiv wrote:Jamellia why are you ok with an Airan lynch if I’m on the bandwagon? I’m one of your scumreads and I am advocating this lynch. Do you think me and Airan are a team?
If that’s the case, then I may be wrong about you. For now, you’re still my main scumread which is why my
vote hasn’t changed off of you.
Second quote feels like trying to walk back from an awkward position (first sentence in last paragraph especially).
Part after comma feels strange, but the emote implies it's not entirely serious so... idrk.In post 318, Jamelia wrote:Hi eth0s! Great analysis so far, except of course when you say you would have voted for me!
Tone here feels unnecessarily aggressive.In post 401, Jamelia wrote:If you put in this same effort as you’re doing right now, maybe you wouldn’t be in a L-1 situation? Can you please explain to me why you haven’t put in effort until now?In post 388, NotMySpamAccount wrote:UNVOTE: oh thank goodness someone is actually playing in the slot now and that's a good catchup. Airan scummed it up enough that I'm def still suspicious, but we're not lynching there today. Also, huh I'm not usually at L-1 d1, I might actually have to put in some effort.
Not a tone thing per se, but I feel that the "no maj = no lynch" rule is something you likely would have remembered from your first Newbie game (iirc it's quite hard to miss in the rules) so this doesn't really feel like a genuine derp.In post 453, Jamelia wrote:When is the deadline? If we don’t have a lynch by then, does it just go to the person with the most votes?
Whew that took a while. That only goes as far as EoD1 (it's a pretty big iso). Now I gotta eat and stuff. Bye for now.
This assumes that one of them are scum to begin with.In post 662, Geyde wrote:I don't see any world in which Faustiv/Egix team is a thing since they've been shading each other for most of today
They could have deflected onto Draynth when that was a very viable push in order to avoid an unnecessary SvS.
I just don't see anything added to the conversation here. This analysis was added once people (including myself) started to question why Spangled wasn't particularly active. This read specifically just screams "yes I agree but I have nothing to add so don't come to me for my opinion!".In post 654, Spangled wrote:I think my townread on Geyde is more solid now, even if I disagree with some of his analysis. In some ways I don’t like his tone, but I think the way in which I don’t like his tone makes him more town, if that makes sense?
I’m quite liking Jam’s tone so far, just scrolling through his ISO and stopping at points — it’s actually all quite good.
I’m starting to paranoia about eth0s, but the last time I did that about a universal town read, theyweretown and it gave scum material to build off of to get them lynched in LyLo. I don’t think this is scum, but eth0s: can I see your most recent scumgame?
So that kinda narrows it down to faüstiv, egix and draynth, doesn’t it?
I’m going to do some ISOing here.
The reason why the beginning of #223 feels out of place is because it reads like something a commentator would say rather than someone actually playing the game, and that same sort of tone wasn't being used elsewhere.In post 661, Geyde wrote:Spoiler:
Comment on 318 takes a stance then backtrack on it in the same sentence.
He spends most of this ISO just shading Jam, and a majority of his comments rely on surmission (C161, C223/225, C401). He's not directly engaging with the logic of Jam's posts, rather dancing around actual analysis while throwing conjecture.
C453 and C223/225 show some semblance of a thought process, but for the latter there's no grounding to what he's saying. He doesn't say why it feels out of place, nor why the second quote walks back on the first.
Understandable if it didn't occur beforeIn post 660, Jamelia wrote:The last one was an actual question I had because that situation never came up in my first game and I couldn't find that information on my own.
- makes a point then mitigates it, noting it as a digression. This is scummy as scum don't like to ruffle feathers and commit to reads so early on the game (this can also be seen in Post 75 where he townshades players but also provides reasons why they might not be town). They remain passive until reads formulate from other town members so they can sheep them accordingly.My prior thoughts on him still apply, but with two additions:
a) I find it selective that he applies the 'too many exclamation marks' tell to Jam, but not to Veggie (ofc this is a small digression that I made in my thoughts on Veg, but I was going through the ISO of each player in alphabetical order so it was initially missed)
b) I find it disappointing that he has made only two posts since I made my wall, both of which are simply him giving advice to other players.
and makes very little sense. Honestly it's reachy. He does say that he TR's Jamelia so I don't get why he made that post.Part after comma feels strange, but the emote implies it's not entirely serious so... idrk.
I disagree with the bolded but I like the analysis comparison to the egix wagon, it's a good pointIn post 667, faüstiv wrote:The point I want to make is this. Both Airan and NMSA's BW's formulated pretty quickly to a point where they were in L! situations. For this reason I am going to mark eth0s as townsince the BW speed on his predecessor was the same as NMSA's. Egix is a player who, at best, is a nullread and at worst a scumread. I don't think Egix has ever been townread this entire game, yet there seems to be a resistance on this lynch and a resistance to put him at L1.
Why is faustiv the most likely scum here?In post 657, Egix96 wrote: VOTE: faustiv
I still think he's the most likely scum here. I could've just gone ahead and voted him much sooner but oh well.
My thoughts in 556 still applyIn post 669, Draynth wrote:Why is faustiv the most likely scum here?In post 657, Egix96 wrote: VOTE: faustiv
I still think he's the most likely scum here. I could've just gone ahead and voted him much sooner but oh well.
What exactly are you scumreading him for?