thank you : ]In post 651, Jamelia wrote:bless you
you're welcome : ]
asleep
which part of me writes the dream
and which part falls
asleep
- Maud Gone,
thank you : ]In post 651, Jamelia wrote:bless you
you're welcome : ]
In post 566, Egix96 wrote:Right now I'm thinking something likeIn post 557, Jamelia wrote:I think you've been asked for this before Egix, and you still haven't done so yet. Where do you think people lean at this point?
Town:
Spangled
Geyde
?? (Need to look at when I get the chance)
Jam
Draynth
eth0s
Scum:
faust
In post 556, Egix96 wrote:Not only for your previous post, but also:In post 550, faüstiv wrote:So you think I am scum. Why?
- Scumreading Spangled for being passive when you yourself were being passive
- You jumping from Geyde to Airan which felt opportunistic (to me it reads as you moving to an easier target)
- WK-ing NMSA seemingly out of nowhere when your only mentions of him prior were a) stating that you had him as "Null leaning scum" in your readslist, and b) mentioning that his interactions with Jamelia seemed to be coming from an uninformed viewpoint.
- vvvOkay, so I get that from your perspective there's a scum between me and eth0s. But you're going after me now, not because of eth0s dying and flipping town, but because you've seemingly suddenly decided that he's town based on little more than a self-meta trust tell. Just... what.In post 422, faüstiv wrote:Not sure. All you and Egix are at least scumleans at the moment. I’d also add Egix to that, but his alignment would be more clear based on what eth0s flips.In post 400, Draynth wrote:Faustiv, you mentioned that you don't like those on NMSA's wagon
who other than eth0s do you think is scum out of {Draynth, Geyde, Veggie}
In post 286, Egix96 wrote:When I first ISOed Airan, it was obvious to me from reading their posts that they were very likely a first-time player. Because the general air (pun not intended) of their posting reminded me of 1890 Egix, it did make me think 'first-time scum?' but I couldn't feel too strongly about it because a) self-projection, and b) their posting could quite easily have come from first-time town as well.In post 285, UrVeggieM8 wrote:@EgixJust wanted to draw attention to 75 where you say your initial read on Airan is pretty similar to Spangled's current one except that you didn't feel as strongly about it. You then said in 217 that you're really starting to feel swayed now. What was it about Airan's posts that didn't sway you before?
Spangled's case on Airan was a vital second opinion -this isn't just a first-time player, this IS first-game scum.And of course I found it compelling.DADV = Dead Air, Dead Villager, i.e. if no one is actively trying to change the direction of the game, it could be a sign that the person currently on the chopping block is town.In post 281, UrVeggieM8 wrote:What does DADV and CFDs stand for?In post 275, Geyde wrote:I want to say DADV given that thread has been both completely warped and died since the push on Airan started. If Airan were to be scum, then why isn't there any pressure being put on CFDs?
NMSA had a particularly shitty progression in 221 completely shifting his mind despite not showing any drop in confidence in scum!Jam, but that hasn't been expanded upon beyond a token comment by Draynth. Even then, there hasn't been any movement in thread toward pushing that further.
This might be clouded by Airan's activity completely dropping off the map, but I think the wagon on Airan is entirely impure
CFD = Chinese (Crazy) Fire Drill/Call for Decision, basically it's when someone who wasn't previously being voted suddenly gets voted and it snowballs from there (something which may occur if someone senses DADV, but usually close to Day deadline).
In post 217, Egix96 wrote:Spoiler:
This is really starting to sway me now.
Airan, do you have anything to say in response to all of this?
In post 143, Egix96 wrote:- Really I'm not sure. It's hard to say what makes one particular question better than another. I wasn't really meaning to imply that I thought there was something better than 66, just that I felt it was overrated.In post 92, Spangled wrote:@Egix
If 66 is not the best question asked so far, what is, in your opinion?
I also don’t really see how it is self-contradictory to say that I don’t think this person should be called scum for doing so-and-so, but that I’ll think a bit about it. You will notice that I did exactly that — I looked over their entrance in their previous game.
- It's just that the two parts of your post that I bolded seemed to send separate messages - "I don't think I can scumread Jamelia for that" versus "I will consider voting them".
In post 75, Egix96 wrote:In my opinion, the game hasn't really yet progressed far enough for me to form any solid reads yet, but based on some ISO-reading:In post 63, Geyde wrote:@Egix96 where's your head at in regards to the thread?
I don't see real solving from your posts
Airan - They remind me a bit of how I was in my first-ever game (Newbie 1890), in that they seem... well, actually I'm not sure how to put it in words. Maybe it's because, like me, they started their first game with a scum rand, but I don't really feel strongly about that. I'm aware that Jamelia "love[d] that [they were] being 'paranoid'" but to me, 39 is a good example of what I'm talking about here.
Draynth - Not really seeing much in the way of alignment-indicative stuff from him yet. Most of his play so far has simply involved asking questions (also his 'quick tip' in 17) so I would consider him the de facto IC of this game (the Newbie game kind, when those were still a thing).
faustiv - I would like to see more from them first.
Geyde - I think that 62 is a +town observation, though it remains to be seen whether I will end up agreeing with it or not.
Jamelia - Probably not scum with Airan based on first sentence of 47. I can imagine the rest of that post being said from one scum to another, but not the first bit, I think that would just be way too corny
Individually though, not yet sure what to make of him.
NMSA - 56 feels a little bit reachy imo, but I guess that that can be at least partially justified by it being that early in the game. Nothing else from him pings me though.
Spangled - 61 - "...butI don’t think I can call [Jamelia] scum over it.I am not willing to put my vote there just yet, butI will consider it." Seems non-committal and maybe self-contradictory?
Veggie - I notice that, like Jamelia, they also end a lot of their sentences with exclamation marks - how has Spam not picked up on that? But I digress.
66 I will admit is not a bad post, but I wouldn't say that it's "the best question asked so far" as Spangled put it... and Airan agreeing with that is... eh? But again I digress.
So with all that said,
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Spangled
Some questions here: one, why do you assume — not so much in the above post, but certainly in others — that I have faded into the background intentionally? That has not been, and never will be, my intention in a game. I’d love to be more active than I have been, and you’ll have to believe me when I say that other stuff’s been going on, including, but not limited to,In post 664, Jamelia wrote:I just don't see anything added to the conversation here. This analysis was added once people (including myself) started to question why Spangled wasn't particularly active. This read specifically just screams "yes I agree but I have nothing to add so don't come to me for my opinion!".In post 654, Spangled wrote:I think my townread on Geyde is more solid now, even if I disagree with some of his analysis. In some ways I don’t like his tone, but I think the way in which I don’t like his tone makes him more town, if that makes sense?
I’m quite liking Jam’s tone so far, just scrolling through his ISO and stopping at points — it’s actually all quite good.
I’m starting to paranoia about eth0s, but the last time I did that about a universal town read, theyweretown and it gave scum material to build off of to get them lynched in LyLo. I don’t think this is scum, but eth0s: can I see your most recent scumgame?
So that kinda narrows it down to faüstiv, egix and draynth, doesn’t it?
I’m going to do some ISOing here.
As someone who was working so hard D1 but pretty much disappeared D2, I question why that is...
I’m worried that you didn’t read my post very thoroughly. See the bolded above.In post 658, Egix96 wrote:I still think Geyde is town. Could you quote any specific posts where you didn't like his tone?In post 654, Spangled wrote:I think my townread on Geyde is more solid now, even if I disagree with some of his analysis.In some ways I don’t like his tone, but I think the way in which I don’t like his tone makes him more town, if that makes sense?
I’m quite liking Jam’s tone so far, just scrolling through his ISO and stopping at points — it’s actually all quite good.
I’m starting to paranoia about eth0s, but the last time I did that about a universal town read, theyweretown and it gave scum material to build off of to get them lynched in LyLo. I don’t think this is scum, but eth0s: can I see your most recent scumgame?
So that kinda narrows it down to faüstiv, egix and draynth, doesn’t it?
I’m going to do some ISOing here.
As for Jam, there are actually a few posts of theirs where I remember not liking their tone. I'll see if I can find them. But apart from that, I agree that they are likely town, all things considered.
Also I'll admit I'm slightly paranoid about eth0s as well, but that's mainly because of Airan and how scummy he seemed to be. I'm just kinda hoping that we don't have another alien->Auro (from Newb1893) on our hands.
So yeah if I had to guess the exact scumteam right now it would be faust/draynth.
Scum can, and do, bus, especially if they’re sure their partner’s going down. Draynth’s vote does not immediately rule out those two being scumbuddies.In post 674, Geyde wrote:Draynth's vote makes absolutely no sense if he's scum with Egix because of points I've already brought up regarding endgaming
The only other person who could realistically be on the same team as Egix would be Spangled because all of his other interactions have been poor
I still think Egix is probably scum, but I really want to look at interactions before making judgements
Doesn’t that make lynching anyone really hard?In post 659, Egix96 wrote:"no maj = no lynch"
In post 680, Spangled wrote:Doesn’t that make lynching anyone really hard?In post 659, Egix96 wrote:"no maj = no lynch"
I would think that to string up a wizard would take a considerable amount of effort.
how? my wagon went up even fasterIn post 668, Draynth wrote:I disagree with the boldedIn post 667, faüstiv wrote:The point I want to make is this. Both Airan and NMSA's BW's formulated pretty quickly to a point where they were in L! situations. For this reason I am going to mark eth0s as townsince the BW speed on his predecessor was the same as NMSA's. Egix is a player who, at best, is a nullread and at worst a scumread. I don't think Egix has ever been townread this entire game, yet there seems to be a resistance on this lynch and a resistance to put him at L1.
That's what I meanIn post 682, eth0s wrote:how? my wagon went up even fasterIn post 668, Draynth wrote:I disagree with the boldedIn post 667, faüstiv wrote:The point I want to make is this. Both Airan and NMSA's BW's formulated pretty quickly to a point where they were in L! situations. For this reason I am going to mark eth0s as townsince the BW speed on his predecessor was the same as NMSA's. Egix is a player who, at best, is a nullread and at worst a scumread. I don't think Egix has ever been townread this entire game, yet there seems to be a resistance on this lynch and a resistance to put him at L1.
In post 677, Spangled wrote:Some questions here: one, why do you assume — not so much in the above post, but certainly in others — that I have faded into the background intentionally? That has not been, and never will be, my intention in a game. I’d love to be more active than I have been, and you’ll have to believe me when I say that other stuff’s been going on, including, but not limited to,In post 664, Jamelia wrote:I just don't see anything added to the conversation here. This analysis was added once people (including myself) started to question why Spangled wasn't particularly active. This read specifically just screams "yes I agree but I have nothing to add so don't come to me for my opinion!".In post 654, Spangled wrote:I think my townread on Geyde is more solid now, even if I disagree with some of his analysis. In some ways I don’t like his tone, but I think the way in which I don’t like his tone makes him more town, if that makes sense?
I’m quite liking Jam’s tone so far, just scrolling through his ISO and stopping at points — it’s actually all quite good.
I’m starting to paranoia about eth0s, but the last time I did that about a universal town read, theyweretown and it gave scum material to build off of to get them lynched in LyLo. I don’t think this is scum, but eth0s: can I see your most recent scumgame?
So that kinda narrows it down to faüstiv, egix and draynth, doesn’t it?
I’m going to do some ISOing here.
As someone who was working so hard D1 but pretty much disappeared D2, I question why that is...another game going into LyLo. Have you been in LyLo before, having lynched two mislynchbait already and having only scum active besides yourself? I can tell you, it takes a lot out of you.
Second, why do you assume that I have nothing to add? I said right after the bolded that I would build off of what I had said in that post. And I will. Right now, I do not have time. But I will, and we do; there are 3 and a half days to go. It’ll be right. My V/LA, stupidly undeclared, ends tomorrow anyway.
This post makes a lot of sense actually (sorry, just reading all of these now). I bolded a few things I agree with.In post 667, faüstiv wrote:There were three key BW's day one.
Spangled: Egix96, Geyde
NMSA: Geyde, Dryanth, eth0s, UrVeggieM8, Egix96, eth0s
Airan: Spangled, faustiv, NMSA, Egix96
All three BW's were opportunistic in hindsight and Egix was on all three BW's. If you read his ISO, Egix seems very keen to jump on each lynch, in particular the latter two ones. The Spangled vote could have been opportunistic in itself as I stated my FOS on him in post 71 (his vote came in post 75) but I think that's a bit of a reach.
Post 217 is him agreeing with Spangled on Airan. In between voting for Spangled and this post, Egix never announced a townread on him, in fact in post 143 it looks like he's throwing shade on the slot. There was only one other post between 143 and 217 from Egix. This post (178) doesn't look great either but I will cover that later. 286 is him using Spangled's analysis to justify his vote on Airan.Again he has never signalled a townread on this slot. Why is Egix sheeping a player who he voted for in post 75? This is strange to me.
Post 375 then sees him townreading Airan's replacement eth0s because 'he put effort in', then he signalled intent to hammer on NMSA. Granted he did throw shade on NMSA previously but I found the reasoning behind his scumreads pretty flimsy and lacking in detail. This vote was confirmed in 451. This townread is weak and I didn't like it. It seems like Egix realised that a lynch on the slot was unrealistic so jumped onto a player that had a significant BW forming on them and on a player that, admittedly, didn't give up much of a fight on his lynch.
The point I want to make is this. Both Airan and NMSA's BW's formulated pretty quickly to a point where they were in L! situations.For this reason I am going to mark eth0s as town since the BW speed on his predecessor was the same as NMSA's.Egix is a player who, at best, is a nullread and at worst a scumread. I don't think Egix has ever been townread this entire game, yet there seems to be a resistance on this lynch and a resistance to put him at L1.
The other point I want to make are his analysis posts. They read as really flimsy and 'half assed'. This is Post 178:
- makes a point then mitigates it, noting it as a digression. This is scummy as scum don't like to ruffle feathers and commit to reads so early on the game (this can also be seen in Post 75 where he townshades players but also provides reasons why they might not be town).My prior thoughts on him still apply, but with two additions:
a) I find it selective that he applies the 'too many exclamation marks' tell to Jam, but not to Veggie (ofc this is a small digression that I made in my thoughts on Veg, but I was going through the ISO of each player in alphabetical order so it was initially missed)
b) I find it disappointing that he has made only two posts since I made my wall, both of which are simply him giving advice to other players.They remain passive until reads formulate from other town members so they can sheep them accordingly.
445 eth0s asks Egix if he wants to join him on my wagon. Egix says he will catch up and think about it. Post 451 he votes NMSA. Note that this vote put NMSA on L1. Where was the catching up and thinking? What happened to that? Admittedly yes, he did throw shade on NMSA but I think the reasoning provided was weak, and definitely appear to be substantive enough to warrant putting that slot into L1 based on the posts Egix has made.
637 he is questioning Geyde for locktowning two players. Attacking townreads is a scumtell.
Analysis in 659 is flimsy, contradictoryand makes very little sense. Honestly it's reachy.Part after comma feels strange, but the emote implies it's not entirely serious so... idrk.He does say that he TR's Jamelia so I don't get why he made that post.
So yes, to sum it up, Egix has:
- Jumped on two bandwagons and started a BW on a player that was previously FOSsed
- Agreed with the player he voted that someone else was scum without stating that he tr that player
- TR the player's replacement because he was 'trying' then votes for another player that had a BW forming on him
- Says he will consider sheeping eth0s' BW on me then 8 posts later votes for a different player, putting them into L1
- Offers weak and reachy analysis that is contradictory in parts
- Has a BW on him that has resistance, despite being townread by nobody in the entire game
Surely this is scum?
I found this post to be interesting looking back. Egix, if you find that faustiv is being scummy due to the targets they have, how do you feel about me? I am scumreading Spangled for the same reasons as faustiv, atm. Does that make me scum?In post 556, Egix96 wrote:Not only for your previous post, but also:In post 550, faüstiv wrote:So you think I am scum. Why?
- Scumreading Spangled for being passive when you yourself were being passive
- You jumping from Geyde to Airan which felt opportunistic (to me it reads as you moving to an easier target)
Dyranth, can I get an answer to this question? You may have missed it but I'd like to hear how you feel about Spangled still.In post 647, Jamelia wrote:What did you notice about Spangled before that made you concerned?In post 632, Draynth wrote:Thank you.In post 629, eth0s wrote:I hope everything is okay with the hurricane draynth.
I have some objections to the logic in your spam posts I am going to get to later
It seemed to lose a lot of it's power (Is this how you describe a hurricane? I've no idea) overnight so it wasn't as bad as anticipated. Just going to be a lot of rain tonight.This is actually something that I had noticed but never really came to the front of my mind to shareIn post 630, Jamelia wrote: Which brings me to Spangled.
I know Spangled has been a main town read for quite a while now, but I simply don't understand how someone who gave such an elaborate analysis at the beginning, really tried helping us, and then was very confident about the eth0s/aidan scum vote not being an active part of today's voting sequence. Ever since we decided that eth0s wasn't the way to go, Spangled as stayed relatively silent.
So, Spangled - I'd love to know where you are in this game at the moment, especially since you have been characterized as the "main town sided" player since pretty much the beginning.
eth0s, I hope everything is alright. When you get back and see this, can you explain how you feel currently as well? You went from being in the main spotlight early D2 to virtually no one looking at you as an option besides Dyranth, and your vote is still on him.In post 683, eth0s wrote:Also I'm sorry for disappearing guys. Forgot to announce V/LA as I am out of town at funeral services. I will be back within the next 30 hours or so.
I disagree with this.In post 674, Geyde wrote:Draynth's vote makes absolutely no sense if he's scum with Egix because of points I've already brought up regarding endgaming
The only other person who could realistically be on the same team as Egix would be Spangled because all of his other interactions have been poor
I still think Egix is probably scum, but I really want to look at interactions before making judgements
Sorry. I saw it but forgot to reply to it.In post 688, Jamelia wrote:Dyranth, can I get an answer to this question? You may have missed it but I'd like to hear how you feel about Spangled still.In post 647, Jamelia wrote:What did you notice about Spangled before that made you concerned?In post 632, Draynth wrote:Thank you.In post 629, eth0s wrote:I hope everything is okay with the hurricane draynth.
I have some objections to the logic in your spam posts I am going to get to later
It seemed to lose a lot of it's power (Is this how you describe a hurricane? I've no idea) overnight so it wasn't as bad as anticipated. Just going to be a lot of rain tonight.This is actually something that I had noticed but never really came to the front of my mind to shareIn post 630, Jamelia wrote: Which brings me to Spangled.
I know Spangled has been a main town read for quite a while now, but I simply don't understand how someone who gave such an elaborate analysis at the beginning, really tried helping us, and then was very confident about the eth0s/aidan scum vote not being an active part of today's voting sequence. Ever since we decided that eth0s wasn't the way to go, Spangled as stayed relatively silent.
So, Spangled - I'd love to know where you are in this game at the moment, especially since you have been characterized as the "main town sided" player since pretty much the beginning.
- The difference is that you haven't been being passive like faustiv was in the early game - you've actually been really active this game, so coming from you it's not hypocritical.In post 687, Jamelia wrote:I found this post to be interesting looking back. Egix, if you find that faustiv is being scummy due to the targets they have, how do you feel about me? I am scumreading Spangled for the same reasons as faustiv, atm. Does that make me scum?In post 556, Egix96 wrote:Not only for your previous post, but also:In post 550, faüstiv wrote:So you think I am scum. Why?
- Scumreading Spangled for being passive when you yourself were being passive
- You jumping from Geyde to Airan which felt opportunistic (to me it reads as you moving to an easier target)
Also, you said that Faustiv jumped from Geyde to Airan. But you jumped to Airan, then to NMSA during D1. Do you think that jumping on bandwagons make people scummy? If so, how does faustiv's or anyone else's case of this different than yours?
Your jump from Spangled to Airan doesn't strike me as a 'clear sense of progression', especially since Spangled was your vote before switching to Airan and there were no indications from yourself about townreading Spangled. You also said in 217 that Spangled's post was 'starting to sway you', then in 218, criticise me for jumping on this vote for being opportunistic.In post 692, Egix96 wrote:- The difference is that you haven't been being passive like faustiv was in the early game - you've actually been really active this game, so coming from you it's not hypocritical.In post 687, Jamelia wrote:I found this post to be interesting looking back. Egix, if you find that faustiv is being scummy due to the targets they have, how do you feel about me? I am scumreading Spangled for the same reasons as faustiv, atm. Does that make me scum?In post 556, Egix96 wrote:Not only for your previous post, but also:In post 550, faüstiv wrote:So you think I am scum. Why?
- Scumreading Spangled for being passive when you yourself were being passive
- You jumping from Geyde to Airan which felt opportunistic (to me it reads as you moving to an easier target)
Also, you said that Faustiv jumped from Geyde to Airan. But you jumped to Airan, then to NMSA during D1. Do you think that jumping on bandwagons make people scummy? If so, how does faustiv's or anyone else's case of this different than yours?
- Jumping on a wagon is scummy if it's done without a clear sense of progression (e.g. voting someone you had previously been tr-ing all game). When faustiv voted Airan D1 (or at least attempted to) it just seemed to me to have come out of nowhere, like he just suddenly decided to push there. Now I will admit to my own hypocrisy on this matter, but in my defence, a) I had been leaning scum on NMSA prior to me declaring intent on him, and b) I could not in good faith continue to push on the Airan slot post-replacement, because my impression of eth0s's catchup/readslist posts was they were too well-made to have come from scum.
Fair enough, your progression on NMSA does seem a little more structured, but I still believe that it was, along with your other votes, opportunistic. I already did a dive on this in post 667.Spangled - 61 - "...but I don’t think I can call [Jamelia] scum over it. I am not willing to put my vote there just yet, but I will consider it." Seems non-committal and maybe self-contradictory?
Yes I am aware that what I did was hypocritical, I already admitted it and there's no need to keep hammering on about it.In post 693, faüstiv wrote:Your jump from Spangled to Airan doesn't strike me as a 'clear sense of progression', especially since Spangled was your vote before switching to Airan and there were no indications from yourself about townreading Spangled. You also said in 217 that Spangled's post was 'starting to sway you', then in 218, criticise me for jumping on this vote for being opportunistic.In post 692, Egix96 wrote:- The difference is that you haven't been being passive like faustiv was in the early game - you've actually been really active this game, so coming from you it's not hypocritical.In post 687, Jamelia wrote:I found this post to be interesting looking back. Egix, if you find that faustiv is being scummy due to the targets they have, how do you feel about me? I am scumreading Spangled for the same reasons as faustiv, atm. Does that make me scum?In post 556, Egix96 wrote:Not only for your previous post, but also:In post 550, faüstiv wrote:So you think I am scum. Why?
- Scumreading Spangled for being passive when you yourself were being passive
- You jumping from Geyde to Airan which felt opportunistic (to me it reads as you moving to an easier target)
Also, you said that Faustiv jumped from Geyde to Airan. But you jumped to Airan, then to NMSA during D1. Do you think that jumping on bandwagons make people scummy? If so, how does faustiv's or anyone else's case of this different than yours?
- Jumping on a wagon is scummy if it's done without a clear sense of progression (e.g. voting someone you had previously been tr-ing all game). When faustiv voted Airan D1 (or at least attempted to) it just seemed to me to have come out of nowhere, like he just suddenly decided to push there. Now I will admit to my own hypocrisy on this matter, but in my defence, a) I had been leaning scum on NMSA prior to me declaring intent on him, and b) I could not in good faith continue to push on the Airan slot post-replacement, because my impression of eth0s's catchup/readslist posts was they were too well-made to have come from scum.
For context, Spangled's case on Airan came in post 213. Your post about Spangled's case swaying you in voting in that direction came in 217. I'd like to know why you sheeped the player you voted for in 75 because to me, your vote reads as opportunistic. For clarification, your reasoning for voting Spangled in 75:
Fair enough, your progression on NMSA does seem a little more structured, but I still believe that it was, along with your other votes, opportunistic. I already did a dive on this in post 667.Spangled - 61 - "...but I don’t think I can call [Jamelia] scum over it. I am not willing to put my vote there just yet, but I will consider it." Seems non-committal and maybe self-contradictory?
VOTE: spangledIn post 694, Spangled wrote:If this flips town I might have to reconsider eth0s though. I also think that if this flips scum I can say that faüstiv’s probably town.