ah, what i mea-...In post 472, Bingle wrote:How do you engage about why you disagree then?In post 467, Nibbui wrote:i really don't like to be self-righteous and go around saying "hi your reads are bad". I don't think mine are that good anyway.
heh
why do i need to keep talking to you about theoretical level things and help you rise your postcount when you won't talk to me about what i want/find important, according to your logic?
at maximum i would be helping you read me but i think i already have enough content ty
fair play says i should just wagon you rn until you spill it