Funny you say that because Chem had the worst entrance in the game.
'Let me agree and disagree with these posts while giving 0 context on why I do' HURT: Chem
Funny you say that because Chem had the worst entrance in the game.
'Let me agree and disagree with these posts while giving 0 context on why I do' HURT: Chem
Coming back over to this
Why did you not just ask
A) I shouldn't need to
B) I don't think I'd care about your answer.
Thanks for clearing up the mechs peeps
"Nice world. It would be a shame if something bad happened to it."
Funny you say that because Chem had the worst entrance in the game.
'Let me agree and disagree with these posts while giving 0 context on why I do' HURT: Chem
Coming back over to this
Why did you not just ask
A) I shouldn't need to
B) I don't think I'd care about your answer.
Thanks for clearing up the mechs peeps
So if I had explained you wouldn't have cared anyway
In post 181, Ginngie wrote:i'll try to make sense of it in the morning lmfao
rakan who you staring at rn
To kill? Oversoul.
Though I do still have an attachment to going spare-kill-spare-spare
I'm thinking this game plan up as I go along, I'm thinking it is best to put people we trust in the 3 spares after all, since both sides are essentially revealed (if you know 1 scum is in 3 people, you know 1 is in the other 2)
Funny you say that because Chem had the worst entrance in the game.
'Let me agree and disagree with these posts while giving 0 context on why I do' HURT: Chem
Coming back over to this
Why did you not just ask
A) I shouldn't need to
B) I don't think I'd care about your answer.
Thanks for clearing up the mechs peeps
So if I had explained you wouldn't have cared anyway
And yet it's scummy for me not to explain
Alright then
No, if you explained I wouldn't be scumreading you about your actions even if I didn't care about the explanation itself.
"Nice world. It would be a shame if something bad happened to it."
In post 181, Ginngie wrote:i'll try to make sense of it in the morning lmfao
rakan who you staring at rn
To kill? Oversoul.
Though I do still have an attachment to going spare-kill-spare-spare
I'm thinking this game plan up as I go along, I'm thinking it is best to put people we trust in the 3 spares after all, since both sides are essentially revealed (if you know 1 scum is in 3 people, you know 1 is in the other 2)
How about no, lover boy. We are not killing me. If anything we are sparing me.
In post 181, Ginngie wrote:i'll try to make sense of it in the morning lmfao
rakan who you staring at rn
To kill? Oversoul.
Though I do still have an attachment to going spare-kill-spare-spare
I'm thinking this game plan up as I go along, I'm thinking it is best to put people we trust in the 3 spares after all, since both sides are essentially revealed (if you know 1 scum is in 3 people, you know 1 is in the other 2)
How about no, lover boy. We are not killing me. If anything we are sparing me.
In post 187, Xayah wrote:No, if you explained I wouldn't be scumreading you about your actions even if I didn't care about the explanation itself.
It's about the effort and transparency of thought heehee
Someone gets it!
yo you wanna join me on a Soul wagon
I'd like to see more scrutiny in the slot
A majority of posts are mechanically related which are NAI
The rest is stating they're obvtown and a weak start in the beginning.
Another key note is that scum like to gravitate towards the easiest scummy things town members can do.
So seeing a rolefish, which is generally viewed as scummy, is a perfect thing to latch onto early game. I note this also because it's the only real read Soul has currently.
Shoutout to PJ and Nahdia for making my amazing new avi :)
Following the previous dozen pages that cropped up in the last 10 hours I would like to congratulate Ginngie for being drunk with distinction. - Vi
Funny you say that because Chem had the worst entrance in the game.
'Let me agree and disagree with these posts while giving 0 context on why I do' HURT: Chem
Coming back over to this
Why did you not just ask
A) I shouldn't need to
B) I don't think I'd care about your answer.
Thanks for clearing up the mechs peeps
So if I had explained you wouldn't have cared anyway
And yet it's scummy for me not to explain
Alright then
No, if you explained I wouldn't be scumreading you about your actions even if I didn't care about the explanation itself.
So my motivation for explaining would solely be to not be scumread
Sure, I have no real reason to object to a soul vote right now. I'd love to see why they think there obv town.
What do you think of chem right now? HURT: Soul
pedit: Are you being purposely obtuse?
"Nice world. It would be a shame if something bad happened to it."
Overblown read on elements, acting like they're super towny (they're not), they don't really care for what's going on in the middle (the mechanics talk) but they're contrarian to the neutral route because "statistics" (fyi I haven't looked at the first game so I don't know if the neutral route is even the same here, I know stuff was changed), then weak accusations like rolefishing, and then scummy role soft when a little bit of pressure is applied to him (and you're not clever with that)
In post 195, Chemist1422 wrote:So my motivation for explaining would solely be to not be scumread
To be fair thats literally the point of the game
No, the point of the game is to catch scum
Xayah wrote:Sure, I have no real reason to object to a soul vote right now. I'd love to see why they think there obv town.
What do you think of chem right now? HURT: Soul
pedit: Are you being purposely obtuse?
I get asked this more than I would like and the answer is usually no, as it is in this instance