Open 768: C9++ [GAME OVER]

skitter30 · Post Post #850 (ISO) » Mon Oct 07, 2019 4:09 am

UNVOTE:

I feel like l-1's are dangerous atm but i'm voting in spirit

skitter30 · Post Post #851 (ISO) » Mon Oct 07, 2019 4:10 am

VOTE: jingle
Actually

Nibbui · Post Post #852 (ISO) » Mon Oct 07, 2019 4:10 am

In post 848, the worst wrote:
In post 846, Nibbui wrote:
In post 843, the worst wrote:there's enough content itt for you to get my alignment right,
there isn't and you should know better
just flicked back to my early iso and I think there is. why should I know better?
I haven't been obfuscating my motives all that much

"my early iso"

are u like

even trying to argument here tbh?

should i read that silly vote on me as town or???

Nibbui · Post Post #853 (ISO) » Mon Oct 07, 2019 4:11 am

In post 850, skitter30 wrote:UNVOTE:

I feel like l-1's are dangerous atm but i'm voting in spirit

i feel like keeping him on l-1 rn is the unique way to correctly read him today if he is town so not sure why you want to unvote

if we let to pressure him later it's just gonna end up in a lynch with no time to change our minds

skitter30 · Post Post #854 (ISO) » Mon Oct 07, 2019 4:11 am

I can see lolhammers happening in this pl tho

skitter30 · Post Post #855 (ISO) » Mon Oct 07, 2019 4:12 am

And i can always vote him again

Nibbui · Post Post #856 (ISO) » Mon Oct 07, 2019 4:12 am

In post 854, skitter30 wrote:I can see lolhammers happening in this pl tho

i don't think anyone here is that bad but i'll just nod my head

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #857 (ISO) » Mon Oct 07, 2019 4:13 am

I solemnly swear that i am up to no lolhammering.

ISO · Post Post #858 (ISO) » Mon Oct 07, 2019 4:13 am

VOTE: bünglé

ISO · Post Post #859 (ISO) » Mon Oct 07, 2019 4:13 am

I am pro lolhammer but can't see myself doing it intentionally for a while yet

Nibbui · Post Post #860 (ISO) » Mon Oct 07, 2019 4:24 am

i think the fact that you didn't reply to me saying i will put you out of misery it's also a silent nod that i should go ahead and do you a favor :'/

Bingle · Post Post #861 (ISO) » Mon Oct 07, 2019 4:50 am

In post 830, skitter30 wrote:Jingle did you try to slip an unawareness of the potential that this game has to be multiball?

I just realized that you/tw dont need to be aligned but can still both be anti-town

And would explain the current dynamic better than svs

I'm completely aware of the ~50% chance that there's an SK. I think I referenced it.

This is literally the first setup I ever modded, you can assume I'm aware of the nuance.

More to the point, how does the situation you propose where I'm sticking my neck out for tw scum by drawing his wagon to me make any more sense if we're unaligned scum? There's maybe a world where I'm terrible at mafia fypov and was trying to save a PR if we're on a scumteam. If I'm an SK, this is literally suicide from the single role in the setup that wants to fly under the radar the hardest. If I'm group scum, why not just lynch someone who isn't on my team? It's the same question as why would groupscum me stick their neck out for town, but assuming that tw is, fmpov, a vig. And yes, scum sees the sk as a vig, because the SK needs to kill scum to win.

Town skitter isn't this surface level, don't let her see D3.

ISO · Post Post #862 (ISO) » Mon Oct 07, 2019 4:52 am

I didn't see that - I'm not miserable, I don't mind if you need to vote me. I'll be finding scums.

pedit: skitter is best take for SK atm

Bingle · Post Post #863 (ISO) » Mon Oct 07, 2019 4:54 am

SK hunting is terrible.

First of all, the SK tells are literally the same pool of tells as power roles. Second of all, that statement is actually wrong. Third of all, at this point it is >>>EV for SK to be shooting to drop the scum team to 1 player, so their shots should be roughly net positive for town.

Bingle · Post Post #864 (ISO) » Mon Oct 07, 2019 4:55 am

In post 835, skitter30 wrote:which is why my push is ridiculous and
i should get off your back
comes from scum

ISO · Post Post #865 (ISO) » Mon Oct 07, 2019 4:55 am

yea
I actually think skitter believes some of her pushes but there's also this cut of stubbornness/opportunism

it's hard to label 100%

skitter30 · Post Post #866 (ISO) » Mon Oct 07, 2019 4:57 am

I'm very good at being stubborn
Incidentally i'm awful at faking it

ISO · Post Post #867 (ISO) » Mon Oct 07, 2019 4:58 am

yes that's why I've been trying to push your buttons

Bingle · Post Post #868 (ISO) » Mon Oct 07, 2019 4:58 am

In post 764, skitter30 wrote:I'm p sure jingle thinks/thought he'd look townier than me in his current push, and it's not turning out quite how he anticipated

Nope. I also don't think you think this.

I'm not an idiot, and you know I'm not an idiot. (Or at least suspect.) I haven't set myself up to look towny at all.

skitter30 · Post Post #869 (ISO) » Mon Oct 07, 2019 5:00 am

In post 867, the worst wrote:yes that's why I've been trying to push your buttons

I know, that's presumably why you're going for sk!me take as opposed to scum!me take

ISO · Post Post #870 (ISO) » Mon Oct 07, 2019 5:04 am

I have you as town or sk yeah probably not groupscum

Jingle · Post Post #871 (ISO) » Mon Oct 07, 2019 5:32 am

In post 870, the worst wrote:probably not groupscum

Why?

Bingle · Post Post #872 (ISO) » Mon Oct 07, 2019 5:32 am

In post 871, Jingle wrote:
In post 870, the worst wrote:probably not groupscum
Why?

Fuck, I'd been doing so good too.

Menalque · Post Post #873 (ISO) » Mon Oct 07, 2019 5:36 am

In post 862, the worst wrote:I didn't see that - I'm not miserable, I don't mind if you need to vote me. I'll be finding scums.

pedit: skitter is best take for SK atm

If we were gonna sk hunt, which we’re not, then you’re the best take for it

Menalque · Post Post #874 (ISO) » Mon Oct 07, 2019 5:40 am

Skitt are you still around