But I'm not. I'm calling Melanque scum.In post 647, Awoo wrote:What does titus have to do to say she's been set up? She needs to call me scum.
Assuming you're town i want to clarify this for you, it isIn post 666, Joey_ wrote:Also personnal take; when I make a shit hammer I own up to it and feels really bad for town.
Imagine being town and hammering 6-7 hours before the guy posted + A slot making a huge case minutes after your hammer.. and not showing even once in their post any sign that they are sorry/feel bad/culpability.
Thats her only post ever admitting she made an error; she admits on the timing of her hammer, not the read itself which is very odd because I would assure you that town would be much more mortified about hammering town (consequence of their actions) than hammering too fast (process of their actions). You need to understand that it's been pages and hours that mutant was pretty much confirmed town in twilight when she said that.In post 294, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Alright i will admit that i should have waited longer.In post 293, mutantdevle wrote:Also Norwegianboy you haven't explained why you decided to only wait 7 hours between stating intent and then hammering.
But i will mention that i saw you online 3-4 hours after i placed the vote, and you didn't comment anything.
Her reaction after seeing the flip, still not going back on her behavior, only implying that she was going to be scumread for it, mehIn post 324, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I sort of expected this...
Can nominated players vote for other nominated players?
________________________
That being said, on a reread she made a few good posts like 286 but eh
It doesn't, necessarily. That's irrellevant as my usage of "aligned" there means "we're in agreement on our thinking" which should be obvious from the context of the sentence.In post 669, Titus wrote:Why would someone agreeing with your reads mean you have the same alignment?In post 585, Sujimichi wrote:If you disagree with my reads, feel free to say so and where you disagree. If you don't, then I'm glad we're aligned.
Why is it a protown move to lynch an inactive slot that is almost certainly to get replaced? You already asserted that the Correspondence was being just active enough not to get replaced or to avoid attention (375, 417), but that wasn't true as Correspondence's last post was 7 days prior to your assertion. I think it's a proscum move to try and lynch a completely inactive slot in it's absence.In post 670, Titus wrote:Scum attack when we make the protown move to lynch Correspondence or get info (GuiltyLion sub).
Both town and scum manipulate. We just call the town version persuasion.In post 681, Awoo wrote:No matter I do I'm being manipulated and I'm just coming to terms with that fact
It wasn't and it's honestly pretty gross that you'd try to put me clarifying that as something that should have been "obvious".In post 685, Sujimichi wrote:It doesn't, necessarily. That's irrellevant as my usage of "aligned" there means "we're in agreement on our thinking" which should be obvious from the context of the sentence.In post 669, Titus wrote:Why would someone agreeing with your reads mean you have the same alignment?In post 585, Sujimichi wrote:If you disagree with my reads, feel free to say so and where you disagree. If you don't, then I'm glad we're aligned.
Make an actual case, be it a line or two but try to formulate something because appealing for votes for the sake of it is not productiveIn post 690, Menalque wrote:We need some more titus votes HERE
We need some more titus votes HERE
There’s not enough votes and too many many scum
There’s not enough votes and too many many scum
Too many scum (we need some more votes in here), Skepta (2019)
I am not convinced that Titus is scum. I'm more convinced in the idea that you are scum. I haven't seen your gameplay, but the fast finger pointing and the aggressive behavior isn't going to win any favor points. Also, this, no offense, was cringe-worthy.In post 690, Menalque wrote:We need some more titus votes HERE
We need some more titus votes HERE
There’s not enough votes and too many many scum
There’s not enough votes and too many many scum
Too many scum (we need some more votes in here), Skepta (2019)
Then this is a good point to start; incoherent is a s tell and you are implying most ppl are being incoherent with their outed read on Titus and their lack of vote on her, shrugsIn post 693, Awoo wrote:He has a point though. With the exception of literally the last two people who posted, everyone else has called titus scum. More people ought to put their money where their mouth is, or if they've changed their mind, make it obvious.
Town are actually usually more "incoherent" than scum. Also, people are scumreading multiple people in the pool.In post 694, Joey_ wrote:Then this is a good point to start; incoherent is a s tell and you are implying most ppl are being incoherent with their outed read on Titus and their lack of vote on her, shrugsIn post 693, Awoo wrote:He has a point though. With the exception of literally the last two people who posted, everyone else has called titus scum. More people ought to put their money where their mouth is, or if they've changed their mind, make it obvious.
I fail to see how it is gross to assume someone can put two and two together (a common definition of "align" in addition to a preceding sentence where the theme is discussing agreement), but I don't feel like getting chastised for discussing semantics again. I didn't try to assign anything toward you with my statement, as you seem to be thinking I did (hence "gross"). Actually, it feels as though you were using that as a lead in to project something you would do as scum to me.In post 689, Titus wrote:It wasn't and it's honestly pretty gross that you'd try to put me clarifying that as something that should have been "obvious".In post 685, Sujimichi wrote:It doesn't, necessarily. That's irrellevant as my usage of "aligned" there means "we're in agreement on our thinking" which should be obvious from the context of the sentence.In post 669, Titus wrote:Why would someone agreeing with your reads mean you have the same alignment?In post 585, Sujimichi wrote:If you disagree with my reads, feel free to say so and where you disagree. If you don't, then I'm glad we're aligned.
Given Awoo is likely town, this could be planting the seeds you two share an alignment when you could be scum.