Your read on me, as best as I can tell, is the following:In post 2267, skitter30 wrote:Jingle tyty for the compliment
I'm very deliberately not articulating a major part of my read on you rn, and i'm p sure you know that, and are baiting me anyways; if i'm reading how this is playing out correctly, we're absolutely on the same wavelength here and the way you're handling this is scummy af, and i have an incredibly difficult time believing that this comes from town!you
I'm bouncing for vla nowish, but we can pick this up when i get back <3
I acted obtuse to build reads and admitted to it.
I detracted from the worst wagon when you wanted it, which makes me s/s with the worst. Also, me/tw doesn't make sense as s/s so we're probably s/sk. (These are both arguments from you.)
I know what you're thinking.
I've been tunneling Egix without expressing why.
That's it. There isn't another reason I can find in your ISO.
The fun thing? You're now being obtuse with your reads. Your treatment of the Egix wagon was leagues worse than mine of Egix. You've been tunneling me without expressing why.
Your own case better describes what you've been doing in the thread than what I've been doing. And where I was obtuse to draw out meat and potatoes stances? Well, you've pretty much ignored every major wagon today. The closest you got to commenting on one was that you didn't like the Egix wagon because I was voting Egix.
