Large Normal 223 | New Beginnings | GAME OVER

EeveeLution Army · Post Post #3400 (ISO) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 4:52 am

In post 3398, profii wrote:Also - I think I reciprocated 2869 as i believed the claim

could you search if he mentioned titus in your chat, also if he thought i was doctor why was he pushing my lynch?

profii · Post Post #3401 (ISO) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 4:54 am

In post 3400, EeveeLution Army wrote:
In post 3398, profii wrote:Also - I think I reciprocated 2869 as i believed the claim

could you search if he mentioned titus in your chat, also if he thought i was doctor why was he pushing my lynch?

no mention of Titus

he only mentioned you twice - 1 thought you were legit the doc, 2 considered you for gunsmith action

EeveeLution Army · Post Post #3402 (ISO) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 5:01 am

well....im not a doctor, and hes a rolecop(note afaik rolecop cant get alignment)

Billy Pilgrim · Post Post #3403 (ISO) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 5:15 am

Just skimmed Gobble's iso. It makes me more confident that tchill is town and less confident that Garmr is.

Also that analysis about killing a non-PR claim to keep the pool the same size makes me even more skeptical of Garmr.

VOTE: Garmr

Garmr · Post Post #3404 (ISO) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 5:19 am

lynching me would probally give me peace

Garmr · Post Post #3405 (ISO) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 5:21 am

but I'm town and you'd be better off lynching scum.

does tchill have results.

Hectic · Post Post #3406 (ISO) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 5:36 am

What's the reason for claimed watcher/voyeurs to not reveal results?

bob3141 · Post Post #3407 (ISO) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 5:41 am

garmr what is your result

Hopkirk · Post Post #3408 (ISO) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 5:42 am

In post 3406, Hectic wrote:What's the reason for claimed watcher/voyeurs to not reveal results?

There's no claimed watchers for one thing.

-Kork

Hopkirk · Post Post #3409 (ISO) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 5:52 am

In post 3360, bob3141 wrote:
In post 3358, Kop wrote:
In post 3357, bob3141 wrote:the gobble kill makes me wonder why him

we have claimed tracker , voyer. a suriving mason. And a few other claims
There could be a chance that they are leaving them alive, to keep some doubts that they are telling the truth about there claim.

I understand that leaving those roles in the game, it gives them a chance of finding scum or hitting lucky and catching one of them out, but scum must have confidence in a game of this size they might not be anywhere near them and they won't get caught at this stage of the game.
but the shear amount of claims wouldnt scum of knocked one off. Unless one of teh pool is scum and they dont want to reduce its size

In post 3367, Kop wrote:
In post 3360, bob3141 wrote:
In post 3358, Kop wrote:
In post 3357, bob3141 wrote:the gobble kill makes me wonder why him

we have claimed tracker , voyer. a suriving mason. And a few other claims
There could be a chance that they are leaving them alive, to keep some doubts that they are telling the truth about there claim.

I understand that leaving those roles in the game, it gives them a chance of finding scum or hitting lucky and catching one of them out, but scum must have confidence in a game of this size they might not be anywhere near them and they won't get caught at this stage of the game.
but the shear amount of claims wouldnt scum of knocked one off. Unless one of teh pool is scum and they dont want to reduce its size
I agree with you. That could be another factor of why they haven't shot inside of that pool.

You know one of the claims is a mason right? I don't think shrinking the pool scum can be in is a concern there.

davesaz · Post Post #3410 (ISO) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 5:53 am

If there is a town voyeur, the result claim needs to go in stages -- first who was targeted, then if anyone claims to have made that target, then what the action was.
But to repeat my previous stance, I'm not going to discuss the full details of the best way to do it. The role catches people based on lies in the details, if it's successful at all.
There are some targets that should not be outed at all by a voyeur, like cops.
Voyeur may at times reveal the existence of an almost-always-scum role, which should be outed if it's important for town to know that role exists in the game.

davesaz · Post Post #3411 (ISO) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 5:57 am

Early in the game when it matters more to work on numbers than on specific targets, scum want to shoot people whose death means little.
In the absence of high priority targets like known cops/docs that is... Masons are conf but they are only priority if their reads are spot on.
One place to potentially look for scum is the people who survive from the pool of people who yield little or no information.

Hopkirk · Post Post #3412 (ISO) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 5:59 am

So we're going for Eevee, then JJD, then Titus then we decide whether we want to go Cliff/Bob/Kop next.

VOTE: Eevee

-Hop

Hopkirk · Post Post #3413 (ISO) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:02 am

Am I confirmed town yet Garmr?

EeveeLution Army · Post Post #3414 (ISO) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:02 am

i dont get how im exactly scum here smh

Hopkirk · Post Post #3415 (ISO) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:05 am

Well tell me why we should do one of those other 5 first.

Hey Hectic, you want to gamesolve a bit?

Garmr · Post Post #3416 (ISO) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:09 am

I will claim last after everyone else.

Garmr · Post Post #3417 (ISO) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:11 am

optimal claim order is
doc
tracker
me

Hopkirk · Post Post #3418 (ISO) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:11 am

Very disappointed Tchill didn't have me as locktown last time he posted.

How about you Garmr-the-town?

Hopkirk · Post Post #3419 (ISO) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:12 am

titus has best scum equity here

profii · Post Post #3420 (ISO) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:13 am

In post 3399, Hopkirk wrote:Proffi is as close to confirmed town as anyone outside Carca/hectic are going to get.

I'm happy to see my scumpool appears to be the only people we are considering voting for.

-hop

Why hectic I missed that
Why not query anything I said

Garmr · Post Post #3421 (ISO) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:19 am

In post 3418, Hopkirk wrote:Very disappointed Tchill didn't have me as locktown last time he posted.

How about you Garmr-the-town?

yah I'm not to sure at the moment I'm readjusting my reads

Hopkirk · Post Post #3422 (ISO) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:20 am

In post 3420, profii wrote:
In post 3399, Hopkirk wrote:Proffi is as close to confirmed town as anyone outside Carca/hectic are going to get.

I'm happy to see my scumpool appears to be the only people we are considering voting for.

-hop
Why hectic I missed that
Why not query anything I said

Because either
a.) another neighbor claims and we consider which is real.
b.) the setup contains a traitor and their scumpartner, there's nobody else in the hood, and the traitor knows who their scumpartner is. IN ADDITION the traitor crumbed traitor several times and the scum killed their traitor instead of a mason just to make you look more town.
c.) it's real and you're basically confirmed town

B requires 3 unlikely stretches and I'm not even close to buying the first stretch. That makes it C for now and C guaranteed if nobody else claims within the next day irl

Hectic is just town.
@Hectic: can you also confirm I'm just town?

Hopkirk · Post Post #3423 (ISO) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:30 am

@LUV

: can you go through the old vote counts and adjust the numbers voting, or confirm that they're accurate and there's double votes/similar in play?

2782- 5 on eevee 4 names on
2946- 2 on eevee 3 names on
3340 - I wasn't using the doublevote here and I'm on twice. Wrong numbers on Alonzo. Texcat on two people.

Probably more, this is just from a glance at 3 of the VCs

Garmr · Post Post #3424 (ISO) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:31 am

In post 3403, Billy Pilgrim wrote:
Just skimmed Gobble's iso. It makes me more confident that tchill is town and less confident that Garmr is.

Also that analysis about killing a non-PR claim to keep the pool the same size makes me even more skeptical of Garmr.

VOTE: Garmr

This seems like a blank statement meant to add substance where none was. Elaborate please.