Open 768: C9++ [GAME OVER]

[nomnomnom]

VC 1.18

Wooper (3):

northsidegal, Wickedestjr, teacher

teacher (2):

DrDolittle, Wooper

Bingle (2):

skitter30, Egix96

skitter30 (2):

Bingle, pisskop

Almost50 (1):

Menalque

Not voting :

NorwegianboyEE, Almost50, Volpe14

With 13 alive it takes 7 to lynch.

Deadline:

(expired on 2019-10-18 19:33:45)

[Bingle]

It isn't. You know it isn't. It DOES buy him a day in this setup. Stop pretending to be dumb.

[Wooper]

kinda thinkin full claiming may be smart

[DrDolittle]

:raised-hand:

[northsidegal]

eh

guess i'm probably just gonna vote bingle after seeing what this vc looks like

[Volpe14]

Part of the reason I didn't want to go for duck was softing, but the other one is that I can't see a logical scum motivation for some of his posts/actions.

I'm not sure which of Bingle or TW I would choose though.

Bingle recently 1v1 with skitt looked a tad bit townie?

[pisskop]

Most of the team reading me for content is bad?

read me based on my proven track record of awesomeness.

like, the issue with self meta is thus:

- anything I know about I can change
- anything I don't know about I can't tell you
- It's in my best interest as scum to mislead you
- If I opt out of playing the game of mafia you cannot necessarily make the best judgement on my play
- Looking for blatant tells is so 2015

[Wooper]

it didn't
@nibs

[Bingle]

kinda thinkin full claiming may be smart

No, shutup you do that tomorrow.

On the off chance you are town, apparently I'm the only one who's seen anything so scum is guessing how useful you are.

[DrDolittle]

if egix is vt id much prefer egix. cause even with a nsg blessed town-read that doesnt assure me i want him anywhere near lylo.

[skitter30]

It isn't. You know it isn't. It DOES buy him a day in this setup. Stop pretending to be dumb.

Hhhvvdse6gcs

[northsidegal]

it disappoints me to see that the doctor scumreads me

not that i think i'm necessarily always the night one kill

[skitter30]

We're not lynching egix

[DrDolittle]

i dont scumread you nsg?

[DrDolittle]

why not?

[Wooper]

lmfao

[Bingle]

nsg said so, apparently.

[DrDolittle]

you are that confident in your scum-read that you think EV potential-PR > EV egix-vt-town?

[pisskop]

If you honestly want to read me or the more unreadable players you need to stop using strict content as your big stick

what about logical progression based on "normal" play from that person
or attempts to manipulate the gamestate
or aggression versus levelheaded posting
or the desire to focus versus paint broadly

I think bingle has scum equity, dubs

[northsidegal]

Part of the reason I didn't want to go for duck was softing, but the other one is that I can't see a logical scum motivation for some of his posts/actions.

I'm not sure which of Bingle or TW I would choose though.

Bingle recently 1v1 with skitt looked a tad bit townie?

when you say your first line, when in time are you referring to? like, when did you pick up on the softing and when did you have the thought of not seeing any scum motivation?

i'm not asking you to point me to softing, i'm asking for about how long you've thought to yourself to not lynch him regarding that stuff, i guess.

i dont scumread you nsg?

not sure if this was a joke or not, but i laughed anyways.

(i meant teacher)

you are that confident in your scum-read that you think EV potential-PR > EV egix-vt-town?

egix isn't a potential PR?

also, if you're talking to me, i'm already planning to vote bingle.

[Volpe14]

I want to lynch Egix to be honest?

It's not a bad take to analyze that wagon if it flips either way

I think it's more likely scum than not if I policy town read teacher.

VOTE: Egix

p-edit:

you are that confident in your scum-read that you think EV potential-PR > EV egix-vt-town?

this.

[Wooper]

i want the pagetop

[Wooper]

woop

[Wooper]

woop

[skitter30]

Sigh