Aight, fast moving thread imo. I really like this.
Minimal experience, I have a lot of experience with ToS/ToL though. Completely different from this forum format. My first game was interesting, and it seems like every game plays out a new story. I love this lmao.
In post 34, Zenith wrote:
What's wrong with an early L-1?
If scum were on the wagon, would they be more likely to stay there? Or would they be more likely to unvote for potential town points?
FOS
@ Fancy and GeorgeBailey.
I feel like in a format like this, it would be super easy for someone to accidentally hammer. I believe keeping someone at L-2 would have been sufficient pressure, L-1 can cause people to
really
panic
In post 43, Suspicious wrote:
The reasoning behind not immediately unvoting was based on gauging the reactions of others I suppose? And then making the judgement call to back off when they did not. If I'm misinterpreting then let me know.
Er kinda. It was more to say "woah wtf,
who let this get to L-1
". I still think Zenith is a bit suspicious for letting it get to that. But reading his other posts, I think it was still more of a mistake.
UNVOTE: Zenith
In post 76, FancyPants wrote:
@Suspicious, reading between the lines Bailey seems like a suspect of yours, why don't you join me on the wagon?
Err.. what? I would love a more concrete answer on why voted me.
All in all, I do agree with
Jamelia
. Don't get me wrong, I love how active you are @
FancyPants
(I really gotta step it up) but you're being super aggressive. (
95) And I dont think a lot of good is coming from it. (Except the pressure on
January
. I liked that)
Vork
seems townlean, Suspicious is townlean from
78. Overall engagement is nice.
Jam
is neutral though. Not enough from
CJ
and
Zenith
to make a read tbh,
January
sounds townlean atm because of
101.
Tictac
is the only one who seems scumlean to me. Because of
45, which is a bit of a stretch. But your vote is still on
Zenith
, and I wanna know why.
Is it still because he didn't answer your question?