In post 169, Zenith wrote:As I've said before, should make it clear when you are voting someone to L-1. Strong scrum lean on suspicious at this point.
Well, that would be a courtesy that I seemingly didn't deserve early game. #44 you state that an L-1 is never a bad idea here, and then you backtrack upon questioning in #126 that L-1 wasn't intentional, and it was supposed to be L-2 instead. Because other unvotes occurred, you believed that clarification was unnecessary; this is despite being put under suspicion and getting questioned for this action. If the L-1 was a mistake, why didn't you say so immediately to clear yourself?
You double down in #161 that the L-2 was what you were aiming for, but an L-1 is fine and you have no problem with it; you admit that, however, it should have been given a warning. Which once again begs the question, why did you not offer a warning in the first place? What was left was a naked vote that, if you're town here, caused unneeded confusion.
In post 170, Zenith wrote:@Suspicious I'd like to hear your case against me. Do you actually think I'm scum? Or is it mere OMGUS reaction?
If you would like to know my case, you'll have to do what you have demonstrated you haven't done and read my ISO. It shouldn't be my job to reiterate my posts/questions for you, especially if you continue to dodge them as you have been doing up to this point. If you are town here, the ball's in your court.