Like half our playerbase is bitching about "spamming" and when we curtail it back, we're stuck in lurker hell.In post 872, RCEnigma wrote:They're...all lazy.
D1 lurker/slight scummy lynch isn't that bad of an idea right now. We have 3 days.
Like half our playerbase is bitching about "spamming" and when we curtail it back, we're stuck in lurker hell.In post 872, RCEnigma wrote:They're...all lazy.
How does that have anything to do with panth. I'm just saying people are focusing way too much on the "laziness" of a wagon or "no original reads" it's like no one here has ever played a large game before.In post 868, RCEnigma wrote:Super gross misreppy post if Panth flips town.In post 858, hebichan wrote:Because people are bad and thing wagon analysis before flips is how you win mafia as town.In post 854, Karnage wrote:So why exactly do people think panthaleon is town?
What if I am 3P?In post 876, bitbringer wrote:Blatant Scum probably has slightly higher chance to be town because post count and we can sort him later by association tells and ISO him later.
I have got an idea.
1) pretending to actually have thoughts on the gameIn post 860, Blatant Scum wrote:1) What exactly means faking nuance?In post 836, Painting Trap wrote:Yeah this kind of describes how I feel on the slot in general.
He feels like he's trying to fake nuance and is hiding behind the awkwardness with the gimmick.
2) Wanna 1v1 me?
That's not how this worksIn post 876, bitbringer wrote:Blatant Scum probably has slightly higher chance to be town because post count and we can sort him later by association tells and ISO him later.
I believe you
I think ppl's reaction to this was a) fake and b) badIn post 674, 0verki11 wrote:no its me misreading a vc.In post 666, RCEnigma wrote:Seems like an in-joke in a pt somewhereIn post 664, 0verki11 wrote:why doesnt the vault dealer wagon feel valid/real?In post 662, panthaleon wrote:I only asked about Zito because it seemed the realest out of those three ._ .
VOTE: Overkill
Not sure why Overkill would post this as scum when it's much easier to hide.In post 677, 0verki11 wrote:not 1v1ing you as im more convinced on Panthleon particulary with his AtE.
Ill happily 1v1 you after his scum flip though
I feel like scum would've kept silent instead of responding to a confusing post soIn post 683, 0verki11 wrote:epic shade right thereIn post 679, Blatant Scum wrote:In post 465, Blatant Scum wrote:Actually, 0verki11 buddied me with Panthaleon, but that is similar.
I wouldnt call it buddying, it was more the lack of assocation created assocation.
And this really doesnt help push an agenda as scum (altho this does read as a little convenient)In post 686, 0verki11 wrote:buddying is direct this is more indirect.In post 684, Blatant Scum wrote:It didn't. It's you who claims it did.
I dont think ive ever refered to you and Panth as buddying, if I have its the wrong word for this.
More of an assocation read than anything else.
Oh, I, in this case, am not trying to fake nuance. I am faking it.In post 890, Painting Trap wrote:1) pretending to actually have thoughts on the gameIn post 860, Blatant Scum wrote:1) What exactly means faking nuance?In post 836, Painting Trap wrote:Yeah this kind of describes how I feel on the slot in general.
He feels like he's trying to fake nuance and is hiding behind the awkwardness with the gimmick.
2) Wanna 1v1 me?
Nah, I am just trying to flake you.In post 890, Painting Trap wrote:2) are you trying to get lynched?
Since no one noticed me when I was trying to build a wagon, I will just sheep bitbringer: VOTE: Josh wilkinson.In post 775, bitbringer wrote:VOTE: Josh wilkinson
Let’s consolidate wagons to get something more substantial to go off