this made me snortIn post 645, nomnomnom wrote:daddy ducky is truly a sight to behold I'd be scared to disappoint youIn post 642, Wooper wrote:go to bed rub and think about what you said.
thanks nomz (i think)
this made me snortIn post 645, nomnomnom wrote:daddy ducky is truly a sight to behold I'd be scared to disappoint youIn post 642, Wooper wrote:go to bed rub and think about what you said.
Fwiw I understand rb's side of it now. It's mostly gut but he was trying to give an explanation people would understand, and not really succeeding.In post 651, Billy Pilgrim wrote:This Kerset/rb 1v1 doesn't seem right. S_S pointing this out makes me dislike S_S's slot less.
I don’t think I was ever close to being lynched in that game, inno or not.In post 607, skitter30 wrote:If anything i think he's being townier here than thereIn post 601, skitter30 wrote:Mini 2101 i think, it ended like two weeks ago, the one sky/tw moddedIn post 596, rb wrote:which town games did you see before?
Incidentally i was scum there, but i'm not sure that's particularly relevant to the subject at hand
He only wasnt mislynched there cuz i faked an inno on him
Didn't want to encourage the fight between Kerset and rb.In post 656, Billy Pilgrim wrote:@S_S - in 486, why me over either of the other leading wagons that that moment?
I don't know. But the only towngame I've played with him he was like "lol it's okay guys " and did not provide any concrete scumreads for a good while. I don't think I care about S_S right now.In post 656, Billy Pilgrim wrote:@nom - referring to 406. given that someone (it may have been you) said S_S plays pretty passively as scum wouldnt his lack of scumread also be part of his scum!game?
Not really a 180 on the read, but I don't think rb and Kerset are ever a team here and I find rb to be scummier at the moment.In post 487, nomnomnom wrote:Aaron feels SO odd in this discussion right now. It feels like you're arguing for the sake of arguing. There's something that's hard to pinpoint about you talking about rb and Kerset, but like... I'm getting suspicious of you about how you made a 180 on your Kerset read and I have the intuition that you're essentially locking yourself out of your Kerset read, because rb must be scum. That's how it feels like to me.
pedit: Also what the hell are those Billy votes? I am genuinely puzzled.
So now you're backtracking? How did you come to this conclusion?In post 510, rb wrote:hot take: luca is scum and kerset and I are both town
or more collaboratively: suppose i was wrong about kerset, and we were both town. how would the rest of you feel about Luca's angle on our slots?
So why aren't you have people vote for me right now?In post 513, rb wrote:why would others perceive you as scummy?In post 421, AaronFrost wrote:In post 335, rb wrote:id be willing to lynch SS just for that, but i think you're a better lynch (=Yeah actually looking back I don't see how this is town motivated. How do we get from "Aaron is a good lynch right now" to "Aaron come vote Kerset with me?" It just feels disingenuous and like it's manipulating me into doing something that others might perceive as scummy.In post 362, rb wrote:forgot to say: vote kerset with me then? =]
VOTE: rb
in fact, why so concerned about what others think of your alignment?
it's quite simple: i voted the wagon i believed most likely to flip scum, but then my kerset scumread outweighed this. as a result, i wanted to see if you'd vote my best scumread in the game
the real question is why you think it's weird that i would want more people to vote my strongest scumread
it's a thing i always am baffled by when people decide my play is 'scummy' because i like to have other people voting my best scumreads. your vote is the most important tool in the game, no?
I mean yeah of course I've considered the fact that my early D1 reads could be wrong, in fact it happens pretty much every game I play. Most of my D1 reads are based on gut/previous experience.In post 517, rb wrote:if you read my posts you'll see that i think luca is also a scumread of mineIn post 442, skitter30 wrote:okIn post 419, nomnomnom wrote:rb does feel verbose but I need to think about that.
I think Kerset's end of the interaction was very odd for sure. I'll even go ahead and VOTE: Kerset. That iso is textbook pessimistic scum having a very low vote/fos ratio. I think the key to decoding rb is actually residing in Kerset's wall.
i reread:
a) rb is verbose, sure, but that's not what i'm particularly taking issue with, it's that his posts are manipulative and seemed designed to 1. get aaron to doubt his townread of luca 2. buddy aaron
b) this is why i found rb to be scummy
c) i still don't particularly have thoguhts on kerset. i read their convo a few times and it just kinda ~is~
So i questioned why aaron townreads him, because aaron said he has prior experience. that means i have two thoughts: how much experience, how relevant it is, and whether or not aaron realises that scum!luca would be aware of this and is likely to play in a way that would get a townread from aaron
these are the things i would expect town!aaron to consider, so when i ask aaron to outline these things, what im searching for is not to make aaron doubt his read: but for information that shows me that aaron himself is going through these processes.
questioning aaron's read is about me finding out aaron's alignment, not about me 'throwing shade' at luca
i have only one vote however, and it makes no real sense for me to simultaneously split my pressure across two slots. i can't realistically push for a kerset wagon as well as a luca wagon - but that doesn't mean i won't try to find out other people's alignments in the process
I'd say this is NAI for skitter.In post 563, Something_Smart wrote:Noms you seem to have some experience with skitter. She's made some pretty weak points at this juncture. Is that normal; is it indicative of her alignment?
Because his pushes on other players who aren't rb/Kerset feel much more natural and town-motivated.In post 567, Kerset wrote:Why didn't you say this about Sirfetch?In post 477, AaronFrost wrote:Bad post. Trying to distract from the Kerset/rb discussions.In post 449, Xayah wrote:Don't know how I feel about the topic just being behind the Kerset and rb slot. Kerset has really bad arguments but the approach they bring to the game feels towny. I think we should still go for Aaron here. Rb is just gonna be...well rb
I feel like you've been shading me a bit but haven't actually pushed me or even voted for me.In post 618, skitter30 wrote:Probably aaron or bilkyIn post 612, rb wrote:who is the scummiest player in the game then?
I havent read any of kerset's previous games
The timing of 610 right after multiple people expressed suspicions of Kerset would be putting up a mostly ineffective argument that would look bad but probably not save them if both were scum; but it's a great way for scum to gain towncred if Kerset later flips town.In post 665, Billy Pilgrim wrote:@S_S I'm confused why Skitt looks worse after a town Kerset flip. Care to explain? I dont generally do pre-flip associatives but I'd like to know where you're coming from.
Pretty much wanted to move off of nom for the time being and onto someone else + the reasons I laid out in 295.In post 651, Billy Pilgrim wrote:@Aaron - 364 what convinced you to vote Kerset other than rb asking you to?
So you think town!Aaron would just allow himself to get wagoned while not voicing my opinions on players I find scummy?In post 656, Billy Pilgrim wrote:Aaron's 477 feels like a way to try and keep the discussion on Kerset and rb and off of him. I dont know that scum would be so transparent about this, but it pinged me. Liking S_S even more when hes talking about the player list rather than theory and mechanics though.
I bet that as soon as Rb wakes up he will repeatedly call each of my read OMG THATS SO SCUMMYYY but whateverIn post 657, Luca Blight wrote:@Kerset: what other reads do you have aside from rb?
...huh?In post 673, Kerset wrote:wooper - I don't take him serious. I just hope that vigilante won't missshot because of his recklessness.