In post 689, nomnomnom wrote:And again that's something guilty people do, there are studies about how people that know they are in the wrong or did something bad will feign ignorance or not directly challenge subtler accusations against them. The subtle accusation that I made against Kerset (the fact that they shade people which is inherently a scummy tactic) was never challenged not even once. I'm inclined to believe that this is because Kerset is scum.
If someone was town and innocent you'd be sure that Kerset would be confused as hell with my whacky theories and say something like "what the hell are you on about???" especially as a new player but that did not happen. This is textbook guilty behavior.
idk
but this isn't how i'm reading the situation
and maybe i'm doing a bad job putting it in words but like he isn't defensive like ~at all~. he doesn't really react to the wagon, or question the votes, or like start flailing
he just seems interested in getting his questions answered, and like that's the main thing he cares about
also i'm not sure how often i've seen scum behave in the model you've described.
like his current tactic/mode of playing is getting bad responses, he's getting wagoned. that isn't altering how he's playing or how he's interacting with the thread at all. he's still approaching it the exact same way ... just trying to get his questions answered and to understand the logic that's being thrown about. i feel like scum does ~something~ in response here, and he isn't
also i kinda have a theory but i'm not sure it's really like ~right~ to say it so i prob won't
ShowHiatus once more.
'skitter is fucking terrifying' ~ town-bork about scum-me
'Skitter [was] terrifying to play against ngl' ~ scum-bork about town-me
'Going into lylo against scum!skit unprepared is like having someone force feed you dull razor blades. It's painful, and once it starts, you're pretty much dead' ~ NMSA
'Skitter you're a spirit animal's spirit animal' ~ slaxx