In post 4684, Cliff Booth wrote:In post 4682, Hopkirk wrote:Woah, if only i could have seen hectic face at that reveal.
Hectic had spoken fondly irl about a certain 'eth0s' who'd been in most of his games to that point. He suggested we join a game since 'eth0s is in it, oh wait he subbed out nevermind'. We joined this one instead.
I'm aware of this wagon. I said several times d2/d3/d4 that I couldn't see any scum on the wagon.In post 4724, bob3141 wrote:hopk it was day one wagon
12thCliff (7) - t(1065), Hopkirk(1071), t (1075) , t (1090), t(1092), t (1097), Hectic (1142),
13th Cliff (7)- , Hopkirk(1071), t(1075) , t(1090), t(1092), t(1097), Hectic (1142), t(1210)
2 days of that wagon and teh only none flipped or confirmed players are you (hopk) and hectic
Whod you watch last night?In post 4728, Garmr wrote:I thought the doc would protect profii?
You basically demanded that we trust you on Hectic. How are you just now seeing this?In post 4730, Hopkirk wrote:@Hectic: I'm kind of concerned that you never say anything bad about Kop/Titus/Eevee while they write the word 'Hectic' a combined total of once over all of their posts. Should I be worried?
Talk out of both sides of your mouth muchIn post 4707, Hopkirk wrote:I haven't been on 'nearly every mislynch'.
d1 lynch- consensus, my vote wasn't on it.
d2 lynch- actively against it.
d3 lynch- obviously I was on it, we had an effective cop claim.
d4 lynch- was not on as waiting for Kop.
The 'POE pool' you mention was literally just you saying 'if 4 people vote someone then one of them is X% scum' where the X% you used was actually just the same % as a randomly selected player being scum iirc.
(Titus/Eevee/Kop) remain scum based on the d1 Cliff wagon I agree.
I've literally said the complete opposite of thisIn post 4729, bob3141 wrote:Hopkirk why would you think scum would consciously avoid this wagon. Scum often end up wagins even when they dont intent too.
In post 4718, Hopkirk wrote:I'm 99% sure I said that if Cliff flipped town then scum were mostly/all inactives. I never said it would make me/Hectic scum since I haven't said a negative thing about hectic at all.In post 4716, bob3141 wrote:i also believe aaronfrost is scum. But in your own words you said that cliff must be scum otherwise one of you and hectic would have to be scum. Only 2 not flipped players on cliff. And that was when proffi ahdnt fliped yet
Come to think of it, Hectic hasn't said a negative thing about my top 3 scumreads and he's followed most of my other reads.
In post 4714, Hopkirk wrote:You should probably factor in scum inactivity in any anlysis.
What did I post that made you attribute 'scum avoided the wagon' to me?In post 4707, Hopkirk wrote:I haven't been on 'nearly every mislynch'.
d1 lynch- consensus, my vote wasn't on it.
d2 lynch- actively against it.
d3 lynch- obviously I was on it, we had an effective cop claim.
d4 lynch- was not on as waiting for Kop.
The 'POE pool' you mention was literally just you saying 'if 4 people vote someone then one of them is X% scum' where the X% you used was actually just the same % as a randomly selected player being scum iirc.
How about you say what you disagree with instead of throwing random shade?In post 4733, Titus wrote:Talk out of both sides of your mouth muchIn post 4707, Hopkirk wrote:I haven't been on 'nearly every mislynch'.
d1 lynch- consensus, my vote wasn't on it.
d2 lynch- actively against it.
d3 lynch- obviously I was on it, we had an effective cop claim.
d4 lynch- was not on as waiting for Kop.
The 'POE pool' you mention was literally just you saying 'if 4 people vote someone then one of them is X% scum' where the X% you used was actually just the same % as a randomly selected player being scum iirc.
(Titus/Eevee/Kop) remain scum based on the d1 Cliff wagon I agree.
Yeah I have mentioned Evee. He even corrected me on his name abbreviation that I can't remember.In post 4735, Hopkirk wrote:How about you say what you disagree with instead of throwing random shade?In post 4733, Titus wrote:Talk out of both sides of your mouth muchIn post 4707, Hopkirk wrote:I haven't been on 'nearly every mislynch'.
d1 lynch- consensus, my vote wasn't on it.
d2 lynch- actively against it.
d3 lynch- obviously I was on it, we had an effective cop claim.
d4 lynch- was not on as waiting for Kop.
The 'POE pool' you mention was literally just you saying 'if 4 people vote someone then one of them is X% scum' where the X% you used was actually just the same % as a randomly selected player being scum iirc.
(Titus/Eevee/Kop) remain scum based on the d1 Cliff wagon I agree.
Also, what do you think about Eevee/Kop/Hectic who you haven't bothered to mention whatsoever this game?
Would like your role claim asap please and thank you.In post 4736, Titus wrote:The VCA is hard to check without colors. Second, names should NOT be removed. Third, a scum lynch is needed to make any sort of VCA the best tool.
I'd like you to vote scum but we aren't getting things we want.In post 4739, Billy Pilgrim wrote:Would like your role claim asap please and thank you.In post 4736, Titus wrote:The VCA is hard to check without colors. Second, names should NOT be removed. Third, a scum lynch is needed to make any sort of VCA the best tool.
Going through your iso you never write the word 'Eevee'. You might quote him, but you never bring up how you read him/mention anything about him.In post 4737, Titus wrote:Yeah I have mentioned Evee. He even corrected me on his name abbreviation that I can't remember.In post 4735, Hopkirk wrote:How about you say what you disagree with instead of throwing random shade?In post 4733, Titus wrote:Talk out of both sides of your mouth muchIn post 4707, Hopkirk wrote:I haven't been on 'nearly every mislynch'.
d1 lynch- consensus, my vote wasn't on it.
d2 lynch- actively against it.
d3 lynch- obviously I was on it, we had an effective cop claim.
d4 lynch- was not on as waiting for Kop.
The 'POE pool' you mention was literally just you saying 'if 4 people vote someone then one of them is X% scum' where the X% you used was actually just the same % as a randomly selected player being scum iirc.
(Titus/Eevee/Kop) remain scum based on the d1 Cliff wagon I agree.
Also, what do you think about Eevee/Kop/Hectic who you haven't bothered to mention whatsoever this game?
I haven't been in the thread as much so I have not reacted with as many slots as I'd like. My real life is taking up much more time than I expected.
In post 2871, Titus wrote:Wait this isn't replaced?In post 2867, gobbledygook wrote:VOTE: EeveeLution
If this is role madness, I think that makes it more likely Tchill is town.
In post 3020, Titus wrote:Hopkirk dances on vanity wagons a lot.
In post 3236, Titus wrote:Hopkirk doesn't look good with the what about others defense.
In post 3306, Titus wrote:Hopkirk, I'll admit I haven't been my best here. Real life got dramatic and it's just now stabilizing.
In post 4409, Titus wrote:I'll try to be more active or sub out soon. I've been very sick IRL.
In post 3242, Titus wrote:Right now, I think Alonzo has a high chance of being scum due to the last second counter on EEarmy
that's fulfilling the technical wording of the problem I have but not the actual reason it's a problem.Alonzo has a high chance of being scum due to the last second counter on EEarmy
This is a terrible response. Looking through your entire posting and you don't mention Eevee by any other names either, except for that one reference you made that you quoted above which wasn't about Eevee at all.In post 4745, Titus wrote:Sorry I don't use your method of referencing EE. Sorry real life has prevented me from posting but I am trying to catch up.