Give her a water Pokemon!In post 523, Gentleman 4 wrote:My beloved misty still hasn’t accepted my invitation. I am feeling what can only be described as teen angst
She is usually accepting of people who do that.
Give her a water Pokemon!In post 523, Gentleman 4 wrote:My beloved misty still hasn’t accepted my invitation. I am feeling what can only be described as teen angst
Personally I don’t trust Gentleman 6.In post 503, Gentleman 3 wrote:I mean I think it's pretty clear-cut?
I ask for clarification in 350
G6 calls my questioning bad and heavily implies that it's scummy in 354 and 356
I defend my question by telling G6 that he shouldn't be ambiguous in 362
I later explain that I only wanted a clarification (372)
“69”In post 527, Gentleman 6 wrote:If you don't trust me, why do you want me paired with a universal townread?
Hi MichaelIn post 529, Gentleman 8 wrote:Fashionably late of course, friends. I do say, this shall be a splendid affair. Absolutely spiffing!
I shall give her my prized tododileIn post 525, Lady 5 wrote:Give her a water Pokemon!In post 523, Gentleman 4 wrote:My beloved misty still hasn’t accepted my invitation. I am feeling what can only be described as teen angst
She is usually accepting of people who do that.
In post 530, Gentleman 4 wrote:Hi MichaelIn post 529, Gentleman 8 wrote:Fashionably late of course, friends. I do say, this shall be a splendid affair. Absolutely spiffing!
Dose the Good Place accept people now?In post 532, Gentleman 8 wrote:In post 530, Gentleman 4 wrote:Hi MichaelIn post 529, Gentleman 8 wrote:Fashionably late of course, friends. I do say, this shall be a splendid affair. Absolutely spiffing!Good day, Deputy Grimes! I hadn't expected to see you here, but it is pleasant to see you again. My, my, you do clean up nicely. Tell me, is that a Python in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?
Very clever as well.In post 482, Lady 6 wrote:I'm afraid not. Older Harry is a Joule of my eye.
This joke is starting to get old. I noticed you barely posted anything of relevance and checked out rather quickly, cannot say I am a fan of that.In post 483, Lady 5 wrote:“69”In post 454, Gentleman 6 wrote:May I ask why you're asking this question?In post 452, Lady 3 wrote:Gent 6 are you thinking of pairing with Lady 8?
I had a small feeling some of what Celeste was expressing didn’t feel genuine, I believe.In post 494, Gentleman 3 wrote:Interesting. Want to talk about this?In post 480, Gentleman 1 wrote:Outside of some small concerns about Celeste I have practically no solid suspicions at this moment.
If you have any questions I said just ask.In post 536, Gentleman 1 wrote:Very clever as well.In post 482, Lady 6 wrote:I'm afraid not. Older Harry is a Joule of my eye.This joke is starting to get old. I noticed you barely posted anything of relevance and checked out rather quickly, cannot say I am a fan of that.In post 483, Lady 5 wrote:“69”In post 454, Gentleman 6 wrote:May I ask why you're asking this question?In post 452, Lady 3 wrote:Gent 6 are you thinking of pairing with Lady 8?
So which lady would you ask out?In post 537, Gentleman 1 wrote:I had a small feeling some of what Celeste was expressing didn’t feel genuine, I believe.In post 494, Gentleman 3 wrote:Interesting. Want to talk about this?In post 480, Gentleman 1 wrote:Outside of some small concerns about Celeste I have practically no solid suspicions at this moment.
In post 498, Gentleman 3 wrote:362 was me being annoyed about G6 getting on my case for asking for clarification. Had nothing to do with the actual thing I asked clarification on.
I’m inclined to agree with this perspective.In post 499, Gentleman 3 wrote:If any part of that exchange was an attack, it was 356. That's pretty pointedly implying that there's something bad about my question.
This is why I like Gentleman 3 the most! :3In post 541, Gentleman 1 wrote:In post 498, Gentleman 3 wrote:362 was me being annoyed about G6 getting on my case for asking for clarification. Had nothing to do with the actual thing I asked clarification on.I’m inclined to agree with this perspective.In post 499, Gentleman 3 wrote:If any part of that exchange was an attack, it was 356. That's pretty pointedly implying that there's something bad about my question.
Why are you so eager to see that pairing, is it only because of the dirty number? I do like that you are trying to provide some content here, though.In post 511, Lady 5 wrote:Also just saying.
If “69” doesn’t become a couple, I’ll be disappointed and I’ll question both of them with everything I got.
They better be ready to defend themselves.
You haven’t seen anything yet.
That and I don’t want to take a risk that the Host was biased. He could have decided to not RNG Gent 6 and Lady 9.In post 543, Gentleman 1 wrote:Why are you so eager to see that pairing, is it only because of the dirty number? I do like that you are trying to provide some content here, though.In post 511, Lady 5 wrote:Also just saying.
If “69” doesn’t become a couple, I’ll be disappointed and I’ll question both of them with everything I got.
They better be ready to defend themselves.
You haven’t seen anything yet.