We have 40 players, most of whom have power roles of some sort. I figure it's not the known 1-shot governor that's going to cause "drama," and frankly if the mod is spending up to 9 days of our time doing this, there's probably some town reason we'd want to figure out someone to pick. I'm not going to speculate on what that is, but avoiding the game mechanic is essentially trying to argue the game is poorly designed. Maybe it is, but I'm going to play the game in front of me.In post 465, InsideJob711 wrote:In post 333, zoraster wrote:hello there. i wish the game didn't start without a notification PM, but here we are.
Everyone who posted earlier than me is slightly suspect.the vote here feels like he's tryna pocket ut.In post 341, zoraster wrote:VOTE: Untrod Tripod for Governor.
Having a 1-shot governor be able to stop a lynch out of 40 people is fine, pro-information, and voting no governor gets nothing.
The gov is just going to cause a lot of drama down the line, so let's just not. You get more information off a lynch then a governor.
Like, not really sure why you want shit because "voting to not get shit gets nothing" when nothing is very clearly better then shit
honestly just feels super agenda driven tbh, along with what was said prior.
I don't really care if it's UT or someone else, but the process of selecting the person and the interaction of what happens after
--
well shiver me timbers. You've found me out. I was trying to play the game.