In post 1041, january wrote:@tictac im still not sure enough to vote, hence the unvote - still waiting for something to convince me i guess
do u think I'm wrong in ruling out skitt+zen?
if not, do u actually object to me voting doc here if ya assume I'm town? cuz I think I'm nearly good to go.
not everything
In post 1047, DrDolittle wrote:"Ruling" out scum-pairs is oft a scum used technique to almost force lynches without seeming so. I.e. vork flipped town (tictac scum would know this), therefore, here is the potential lynch options for today. It looks natural, and is a way to push votes without thinking.
now u making stuff up.
Plus I don't think it's a very good POE in the first place.
ok. what part of it is flawed?
jan-town or ruling out zen+skitt?
cuz if I'm right about both of those things then ya have to be scum from my pow.
in fact I'd expect the logic to work in reverse if ya town, and make me look scummy to ya, yet ya pushing skitt more than ya push me.
calling me scum is super unconvincing for me cuz I know it's not true, but if there's flaws in my logic feel free to point them out.
pedit: ok. here's the logic for ruling out skitt+zen:
In post 1027, tictac wrote:
CJ could have easily unvoted buddy.zen in
164.
-> I still think skitt+zen is ruled out.
CJ pushing zen while zen on L-1, before the mason reveals, leaving him in L-1 for 24h despite esily could have unvoted 'to prevent quickhammers'.
zen putting skitt on L-1 day 2.
i think this play is sufficiently crazy that scumz would not in fact do that.
