I'm not expecting them to know, I'm expecting them to help me figure it out.In post 1492, Gentleman 4 wrote:If things usually work out in time, how are you expecting the player base to know how later days will turn out or whether or not you will make it to end game?
...Because they don't always, and because I just said it's possible my partner leaves on me before I can convince her I'm town?If things usually work out in time, why are you so scared of who you choose?
Gentleman 4 is anti-town. Ignore him. Play your own game.In post 1498, Gentleman 3 wrote:Yes.In post 1492, Gentleman 4 wrote:Do you really think that it doesn't matter who you pair with if you will not make it to end game?
I'm glad we're on the same page here in several places, at least in overall read, if not in the specifics. (Not to say we disagree on the specifics, but I digress.)In post 1496, Lady 4 wrote:I'm thinking she is likely town. Also, I think shes only made one rude post in this game and I dont understand why she keeps apologizing for playing mafia.In post 1478, Gentleman 4 wrote:And because my curiosity gets the better of me, I must ask, Lady 4, how do you feel about Lady 7 right now?
I have read the last few pages but I didn't have much to say about them except that I share the concerns about Lady 8 but not so much the specific criticisms. I'm also thinking Lady 3 might be town for the bizarre series of posts that seem to me like they were clearly doomed not to accomplish anything.
It's wearing off, if that helps.In post 1494, Gentleman 7 wrote:Also, L4's kind of suspicious of me
That's actually a really good way to describe me, lmao.In post 1505, Lady 4 wrote:At least G3 is sticking to his guns, even though they are weird and bad guns.
I dont like thisIn post 1495, Gentleman 8 wrote:Hello again, good citizens!
The volume of communication here is simply staggering, and I struggle to keep up, particularly while wearing this excellent and most efficacious mask, which, while handsome, leaves much to be desired for eye-holes.
I am entirely flexible with regard to a partner. I find most of the judgments discussed here premature. Either I am paired with a good and talented dancer, in which case I shall be delighted to waltz the night away, or I shall be paired with one who steps on toes and uses the wrong fork at dinner. In the latter case, I will be delighted to do the company a service and leave the dance with her. To wit, based on Gentleman 4's list,
Lady Lucky #7, will you dance with me?
That's why I feel G3 and I are kindred spirits. We are both open, honest and stubborn.In post 1506, Gentleman 3 wrote:That's actually a really good way to describe me, lmao.In post 1505, Lady 4 wrote:At least G3 is sticking to his guns, even though they are weird and bad guns.
I reread her recently and I mostly just do not see why she has gotten so many townreads. Most of her posts are whatever.In post 1503, Gentleman 4 wrote:Talk more about the specifics on Lady 8? I might have missed the points you discuss here, and I'm a bit out of the loop on this read.
Perhaps I phrased incorrectly; If you knew you would die before you made it to the end of the game, you would not try to find and match with scum?In post 1498, Gentleman 3 wrote:Yes.In post 1492, Gentleman 4 wrote:Do you really think that it doesn't matter who you pair with if you will not make it to end game?
I somewhat understand, but you understand yourself better than anyone else here.In post 1500, Gentleman 3 wrote:I'm not expecting them to know, I'm expecting them to help me figure it out.In post 1492, Gentleman 4 wrote:If things usually work out in time, how are you expecting the player base to know how later days will turn out or whether or not you will make it to end game?
Right, so does it not follow to pick the partner who you've stated before you have little doubt would stick with you until the end?...Because they don't always, and because I just said it's possible my partner leaves on me before I can convince her I'm town?If things usually work out in time, why are you so scared of who you choose?
I meant the replacement. Because how well you interact with your partner isn't as guaranteed if they're possible to slip up and post from their main, while their alignment will be the same.In post 1203, Lady 9 wrote:What do you mean "after what happened with G2"?In post 860, Gentleman 7 wrote:I'd argue that this is even more important than partnering with someone you think would mesh well, after what happened to G2.
I imagine it's because he immediately proposes in his first post in the thread in a while?In post 1507, Gentleman 5 wrote:I dont like thisIn post 1495, Gentleman 8 wrote:Hello again, good citizens!
The volume of communication here is simply staggering, and I struggle to keep up, particularly while wearing this excellent and most efficacious mask, which, while handsome, leaves much to be desired for eye-holes.
I am entirely flexible with regard to a partner. I find most of the judgments discussed here premature. Either I am paired with a good and talented dancer, in which case I shall be delighted to waltz the night away, or I shall be paired with one who steps on toes and uses the wrong fork at dinner. In the latter case, I will be delighted to do the company a service and leave the dance with her. To wit, based on Gentleman 4's list,
Lady Lucky #7, will you dance with me?
I think it largely comes from her push for a pro-town game state and the fact that in contrast to several other players she looks less scummy to many people. Is there anything specific about her you want to discuss?In post 1509, Lady 4 wrote:I reread her recently and I mostly just do not see why she has gotten so many townreads. Most of her posts are whatever.In post 1503, Gentleman 4 wrote:Talk more about the specifics on Lady 8? I might have missed the points you discuss here, and I'm a bit out of the loop on this read.
I like this pair. G5 felt pretty townie (also, did he change his image partway though, or was he replaced)?In post 1248, Lady 4 wrote:Screw it, I don't want L5 to have the opportunity to snipe me.
Dance with Gentleman 5
Okay, I see where you're going now. I was operating under the assumption that nobody's going to let any of the AFK gentlemen near endgame, which would mean that yes, I would have no incentive to match with scum because everyone not yet matched would die regardless.In post 1510, Gentleman 4 wrote:Perhaps I phrased incorrectly; If you knew you would die before you made it to the end of the game, you would not try to find and match with scum?
Yeah, you're right. Though I can't say I'm an expert on how people read me. If I were, my scumgame would be a hell of a lot better than it is.I somewhat understand, but you understand yourself better than anyone else here.
Not directly, because getting walked out on isn't the only way to die-- if people don't townread L5 and they want her dead, it doesn't matter that she townreads me.Right, so does it not follow to pick the partner who you've stated before you have little doubt would stick with you until the end?
I was kind of back and forth on G3 in my head, up until this point. This feels like the same kind of thing I was thinking.In post 1304, Gentleman 3 wrote:I mean the point of this game is to pair confident townreads with each other, so like, I only want to pair with someone I confidently townread if people also confidently townread me. It's common sense if you think ahead, but most people just aren't.In post 1298, Lady 7 wrote:G3 not asking anyone even though he's been around a lot feels weird. I don't like his I don't want to drag anyone down, can we make it to endgame really.
I worry that he's waiting to see if his partner is townread enough for a scum-scum pairing that will make them super strong scum pairing that they'll win in that end game stand off.
I think it was reckless given he hasnt caught up and is just going by your post.In post 1513, Gentleman 4 wrote:That is to say I would like to hear much more from Gentleman 8, and I, too, will be severely disappointed if this is all he has to offer today.
I got alot more active. Lets just keep it at thatIn post 1514, Gentleman 7 wrote:I like this pair. G5 felt pretty townie (also, did he change his image partway though, or was he replaced)?In post 1248, Lady 4 wrote:Screw it, I don't want L5 to have the opportunity to snipe me.
Dance with Gentleman 5
Still hoping for G6/L7.
Wow. I don't think I've ever had a single post clarify so much for me simultaneously. No joke the lyrics "And at last I see the light" appeared in my head after I had read the entirety of this post. Thank you, a lot of what you're doing makes significantly more sense now.In post 1515, Gentleman 3 wrote:Okay, I see where you're going now. I was operating under the assumption that nobody's going to let any of the AFK gentlemen near endgame, which would mean that yes, I would have no incentive to match with scum because everyone not yet matched would die regardless.In post 1510, Gentleman 4 wrote:Perhaps I phrased incorrectly; If you knew you would die before you made it to the end of the game, you would not try to find and match with scum?
If that isn't true, it I guess is somewhat important for me to match with scum, but it's far more important to just identify which other unpaired gentleman is the towniest and match HIM with town. Technically pairing with scum increases the chances of this, but it's equally effective to pair whichever lady I think is scum with a gentleman who also isn't going to make it to endgame.
Certainly, the possibility of a currently unpaired scum lady living to endgame with a currently unpaired gentleman is not the biggest concern of mine right now.Yeah, you're right. Though I can't say I'm an expert on how people read me. If I were, my scumgame would be a hell of a lot better than it is.I somewhat understand, but you understand yourself better than anyone else here.Not directly, because getting walked out on isn't the only way to die-- if people don't townread L5 and they want her dead, it doesn't matter that she townreads me.Right, so does it not follow to pick the partner who you've stated before you have little doubt would stick with you until the end?
I must have skimmed the post too much, then, I thought he had at least skimmed several pages.In post 1518, Gentleman 5 wrote:I think it was reckless given he hasnt caught up and is just going by your post.In post 1513, Gentleman 4 wrote:That is to say I would like to hear much more from Gentleman 8, and I, too, will be severely disappointed if this is all he has to offer today.
In post 1513, Gentleman 4 wrote:That is to say I would like to hear much more from Gentleman 8, and I, too, will be severely disappointed if this is all he has to offer today.